Now Reading
Biosphere 2 – Wikipedia

Biosphere 2 – Wikipedia

2023-05-26 13:47:34

Synthetic closed ecological system situated in Oracle, Arizona

Biosphere 2 is an American Earth system science analysis facility situated in Oracle, Arizona. Its mission is to function a middle for analysis, outreach, instructing, and lifelong learning about Earth, its dwelling programs, and its place within the universe.[1] It’s a 3.14-acre (1.27-hectare)[2] construction initially constructed to be a synthetic, materially closed ecological system, or vivarium. It stays the biggest closed ecological system ever created.[3]

Constructed between 1987 and 1991, Biosphere 2 was initially meant to show the viability of closed ecological programs to assist and preserve human life in outer space[4] as an alternative to Earth’s biosphere. It was designed to discover the net of interactions inside life programs in a construction with completely different areas primarily based on numerous organic biomes. Along with the a number of biomes and dwelling quarters for individuals, there was an agricultural space and work area to review the interactions between people, farming, expertise and the remainder of nature as a brand new form of laboratory for the examine of the worldwide ecology. Its mission was a two-year closure experiment with a crew of eight people (“biospherians”).[5] Lengthy-term it was seen as a precursor to gaining data about using closed biospheres in space colonization. As an experimental ecological facility it allowed the examine and manipulation of a mini biospheric system with out harming Earth’s biosphere.

Its seven biome areas have been a 1,900-square-meter (20,000 sq ft) rainforest, an 850-square-meter (9,100 sq ft) ocean with a coral reef, a 450-square-meter (4,800 sq ft) mangrove wetlands, a 1,300-square-metre (14,000 sq ft) savannah grassland, a 1,400-square-meter (15,000 sq ft) fog desert, and two anthropogenic biomes: a 2,500-square-meter (27,000 sq ft) agricultural system and a human habitat with dwelling areas, laboratories and workshops. Under floor was an intensive a part of the technical infrastructure. Heating and cooling water circulated by means of impartial piping programs and passive solar enter by means of the glass space frame panels protecting a lot of the facility, and electrical power was equipped into Biosphere 2 from an onsite pure gasoline power middle.[2]

Biosphere 2 was solely used twice for its authentic supposed functions as a closed-system experiment: as soon as from 1991 to 1993, and the second time from March to September 1994. Each makes an attempt bumped into issues together with low quantities of meals and oxygen, die-offs of many animals and crops included within the experiment (although this was anticipated for the reason that mission used a technique of intentionally “species-packing” anticipating losses because the biomes developed), group dynamic tensions among the many resident crew, exterior politics, and an influence battle over administration and course of the mission. However, the closure experiments set world information in closed ecological programs, agricultural manufacturing, well being enhancements with the excessive nutrient and low caloric weight loss program the crew adopted, and insights into the self-organization of complicated biomic programs and atmospheric dynamics.[6] The second closure experiment achieved complete meals sufficiency and didn’t require injection of oxygen.[7]

In June 1994, in the course of the center of the second experiment, the managing firm, House Biosphere Ventures, was dissolved, and the ability was left in limbo. Columbia University assumed administration of the ability in 1995 and used it to run experiments till 2003. It then seemed to be in peril of being demolished to make means for housing and retail shops, however was taken over for analysis by the College of Arizona in 2007. The University of Arizona took full possession of the construction in 2011.

Planning and development[edit]

Biosphere 2, with upgraded photo voltaic panels in foreground, sits on a sprawling 40-acre (16-hectare) science campus that’s open to the general public.

The Biosphere 2 mission was launched in 1984 by businessman and billionaire philanthropist Ed Bass and programs ecologist John P. Allen, with Bass offering US$150 million in funding till 1991.[8] Bass and Allen had met within the Nineteen Seventies on the Synergia Ranch, a counterculture neighborhood led by Allen, who advocated Buckminster Fuller‘s “Spaceship Earth” idea and explored the concept of biospheres as a refuge from disasters equivalent to nuclear conflict.[8] A number of different former members of Synergia Ranch additionally joined the Biosphere 2 mission.[8]

Development was carried out between 1987 and 1991 by House Biosphere Ventures, a joint venture whose principal officers have been John P. Allen, inventor and government chairman; Margaret Augustine, CEO; Marie Harding, vice-president of finance; Abigail Alling, vp of analysis; Mark Nelson, director of area and environmental purposes, William F. Dempster, director of system engineering, and Norberto Alvarez-Romo, vp of mission management.[citation needed]

It was named “Biosphere 2” as a result of it was meant to be the second absolutely self-sufficient biosphere, after the Earth itself (“Biosphere 1”).


The glass and spaceframe facility is situated in Oracle, Arizona on the base of the Santa Catalina Mountains, about 50 minutes north of Tucson. Its elevation is round 4,000 ft (1,200 m) above sea stage.[9]


Exterior exhibiting components of the rainforest biome and of the habitat, with the West lung within the background

The above-ground bodily construction of Biosphere 2 was manufactured from metal tubing and high-performance glass and metal frames. The body and glazing supplies have been designed and made to specification by a agency run by a one-time affiliate of Buckminster Fuller, Peter Jon Pearce (Pearce Constructions, Inc.).[10][11] The window seals and constructions needed to be designed to be nearly completely hermetic, such that the air trade can be extraordinarily low, allowing monitoring of refined modifications over time. The patented hermetic sealing strategies, developed by Pearce and William Dempster, achieved a leak charge of lower than 10% per yr. With out such tight closure, the sluggish decline of oxygen which occurred at a charge of lower than 14% per 30 days in the course of the first two-year closure experiment won’t have been detected.[12][13][14]

Throughout the day, the warmth from the solar induced the air inside to increase and in the course of the evening it cooled and contracted. To keep away from having to take care of the large forces that sustaining a relentless quantity would create, the construction had massive diaphragms saved in domes known as “lungs” or variable quantity constructions.[15]

Since opening a window was not an possibility, the construction additionally required a classy system to manage temperatures inside desired parameters, which assorted for the completely different biomic areas. Although cooling was the biggest power want, heating needed to be equipped within the winter and closed loop pipes and air handlers have been key components of the power system. An power middle on web site supplied electrical energy and heated and cooled water, using pure gasoline and backup mills, ammonia chillers and water cooling towers.[16]

First mission[edit]

First mission crew member Mark Nelson measuring soil moisture subsequent to CO2 efflux machine in 1993
Exterior video
video icon Odyssey in Two Biospheres – documentary movie with historic footage of the primary mission of Biosphere 2, reflections from three of the unique mission members, and their life after re-entry into Biosphere 1 (full episode).

The primary closed mission lasted from September 26, 1991, to September 26, 1993. The crew have been: medical physician and researcher Roy Walford, Jane Poynter, Taber MacCallum, Mark Nelson, Sally Silverstone, Abigail Alling, Mark Van Thillo, and Linda Leigh.[17]

The agricultural system produced 83% of the entire weight loss program, which included crops of bananas, papayas, candy potatoes, beets, peanuts, lablab and cowpea beans, rice, and wheat.[18][19] Particularly in the course of the first yr, the eight inhabitants reported continuous starvation. Calculations indicated that Biosphere 2’s farm was amongst the very best producing on this planet “exceeding by greater than 5 instances that of essentially the most environment friendly agrarian communities of Indonesia, southern China, and Bangladesh”.[20]

They consumed the identical low-calorie, nutrient-dense weight loss program that Roy Walford had studied in his analysis on extending lifespan through diet.[21] Medical markers indicated the well being of the crew in the course of the two years was wonderful. They confirmed the identical enchancment in well being indices equivalent to reducing of blood ldl cholesterol, blood stress, enhancement of immune system. They misplaced a mean of 16% of their pre-entry physique weight earlier than stabilizing and regaining some weight throughout their second yr.[22] Subsequent research confirmed that the biospherians’ metabolism turned extra environment friendly at extracting vitamins from their meals as an adaptation to the low-calorie, excessive nutrient weight loss program.[23] “The general well being of the biospherians crews inside Biosphere 2 verify that the unique design of the Biosphere 2 technosphere programs did keep away from a buildup of poisons, and the bioregenerative applied sciences and life programs inside Biosphere 2 maintained a wholesome setting.”[24]

A few of the home animals that have been included within the agricultural space in the course of the first mission included: 4 African pygmy goats and one billy goat; 35 hens and three roosters (a mixture of Indian jungle fowl (Gallus gallus), Japanese silky bantam, and a hybrid of those); two sows and one boar Ossabaw dwarf pigs; and tilapia fish grown in a rice and azolla pond system originating millennia in the past in China.[25]

Biosphere 2, seen from the thornscrub, a transition zone between Savannah and Desert (foreground) and Ocean (background) sections

A method of “species-packing” was practiced to make sure that meals webs and ecological operate may very well be maintained if some species didn’t survive. The fog desert space turned extra chaparral in character resulting from condensation from the area body. The savannah was seasonally energetic; its biomass was lower and saved by the crew as a part of their administration of carbon dioxide. Rainforest pioneer species grew quickly, however timber there and within the savannah suffered from etiolation and weak spot attributable to lack of stress wood, usually created in response to winds in pure situations. Corals reproduced within the ocean space, and crew helped preserve ocean system well being by hand-harvesting algae from the corals, manipulating calcium carbonate and pH ranges to stop the ocean changing into too acidic, and by putting in an improved protein skimmer to complement the algae turf scrubber system initially put in to take away extra vitamins.[26] The mangrove space developed quickly however with much less understory than a typical wetland presumably due to decreased mild ranges.[27] However, it was judged to be a profitable analogue to the Everglades space of Florida the place the mangroves and marsh crops have been collected.[28]

Biosphere 2, due to its small dimension and buffers, and focus of natural supplies and life, had better fluctuations and extra fast biogeochemical cycles than are present in Earth’s biosphere.[29] Many of the launched vertebrate species and nearly all the pollinating insects died, although there was replica of crops and animals.[30] Insect pests, like cockroaches, flourished. Many bugs had been included in authentic species mixes within the biomes however a globally invasive tramp ant species, Paratrechina longicornis, unintentionally sealed in, had come to dominate different ant species.[31] The deliberate ecological succession within the rainforest and methods to guard the realm from harsh incident daylight and salt aerosols from the ocean labored effectively, and a shocking quantity of the unique biodiversity persevered.[32] Biosphere 2 in its early ecological improvement was likened to an island ecology.[33]

Group dynamics: psychology, battle, and cooperation[edit]

View of a part of the crew eating room, serving counter from kitchen and stairway as much as an leisure space

The crew’s kitchen because it initially seemed in the course of the first mission

A lot of the proof for remoted human teams comes from psychological research of scientists overwintering in Antarctic analysis stations.[34] The examine of this phenomenon is “confined environment psychology” (cf. environmental psychology); in line with Jane Poynter,[35][36] it was recognized to be a problem and crews usually cut up into factions.[37]

Earlier than the primary closure mission was half over, the group had cut up into two factions and, in line with Poynter, individuals who had been intimate buddies had change into implacable enemies, barely on talking phrases.[38] Others level out that the crew continued to work collectively as a group to realize the experiment’s targets, conscious that any motion that harmed Biosphere 2 would possibly imperil their very own well being. That is in distinction to different expeditions the place inside frictions might have led to unconscious sabotage of one another and the general mission. The entire crew felt a really sturdy and visceral bond with their dwelling world.[39] They saved air and water high quality, atmospheric dynamics and well being of the life programs continuously of their consideration in a really visceral and profound means. This intimate “metabolic connection” enabled the crew to discern and reply to even refined modifications within the dwelling programs.[40] “Appreciation of the worth of biosphere interconnectedness and interdependency was appreciated as each an on a regular basis magnificence and a difficult actuality,”[39] Walford later acknowledged, “I do not like a few of them, however we have been a hell of a group. That was the character of the factionalism… however regardless of that, we ran the rattling factor and we cooperated completely.”[41]

The factions contained in the bubble fashioned from a rift and energy battle between the three way partnership companions on how the science ought to proceed, as biospherics or as specialist ecosystem research (perceived as reductionist). The faction that included Poynter felt strongly that rising analysis must be prioritized over diploma of closure. The opposite faction backed mission administration and the general mission aims. On February 14, a portion of the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) resigned.[42] Time magazine wrote: “Now, the veneer of credibility, already bruised by allegations of tamper-prone knowledge, secret meals caches and smuggled provides, has cracked … the two-year experiment in self-sufficiency is beginning to look much less like science and extra like a $150 million stunt.”[43] In truth, the SAC was dissolved as a result of it had deviated from its mandate to assessment and enhance scientific analysis and have become concerned in advocating administration modifications. A majority of the SAC members selected to stay as consultants to Biosphere 2. The SAC’s suggestions of their report have been applied together with a brand new Director of Analysis Jack Corliss, permitting import/export of scientific samples and tools by means of the ability airlocks to extend analysis and reduce crew labor, and to generate a proper analysis program. Some sixty-four initiatives have been included within the analysis program that Walford and Alling spearheaded growing.[44]

Residential space inside Biosphere 2

Undoubtedly the decreased oxygen and the calorie-restricted, nutrient-dense weight loss program[45] contributed to low morale.[46] The Alling faction feared that the Poynter group have been ready to go as far as to import meals, if it meant making them fitter to hold out analysis initiatives. They thought of that will be a mission failure by definition.

In November 1992, the hungry Biospherians started consuming seed shares that had not been grown contained in the Biosphere 2.[47] Poynter made Chris Helms, PR Director for the enterprise, conscious of this. She was promptly dismissed by Margret Augustine, CEO of House Biospheres Ventures, and informed to return out of the biosphere. This order was, nonetheless, by no means carried out. Poynter writes[48] that she merely determined to remain put, appropriately reasoning that the order couldn’t be enforced with out successfully terminating the closure.

Remoted teams have a tendency to connect better significance to group dynamic and private emotional fluctuations frequent in all teams. Some experiences from polar station crews exaggerated psychological issues.[49] Though among the first closure group thought they have been depressed, psychological examination of the biospherians confirmed no melancholy and match the explorer/adventurer profile, with each men and women scoring very equally to astronauts.[50] One of many psychologists famous, “If I used to be misplaced within the Amazon and was searching for a information to get out, and to outlive with, then the biospherian crew can be prime selections.”[51]


Among the many issues and miscalculations encountered within the first mission have been unanticipated condensation making the “desert” too moist, inhabitants explosions of greenhouse ants and cockroaches, morning glories overgrowing the rainforest space blocking out different crops, and fewer daylight (40–50% of outdoor mild) coming into the ability than initially anticipated. Biospherians intervened to regulate invasive crops when wanted to protect biodiversity, functioning as “keystone predators“. As well as, development itself was a problem; for instance, it was troublesome to govern the our bodies of water to have waves and tidal modifications.[52][53] Engineers got here up with revolutionary options to complement pure capabilities the Earth’s biosphere usually performs, e.g. vacuum pumps to create light waves within the ocean with out endangering marine biota, refined heating and cooling programs. All of the expertise was chosen to attenuate outgassing and discharge of dangerous substances which could injury Biosphere 2’s life.[54][55]

There was controversy when the general public realized that the mission had allowed an injured member to go away and return, carrying new materials inside. The group claimed the one new provides introduced in have been plastic luggage, however others accused them of bringing meals and different gadgets. Extra criticism was raised when it was realized that, likewise, the mission injected oxygen in January 1993 to make up for a failure within the stability of the system that resulted within the quantity of oxygen steadily declining.[56] Some thought that these criticisms ignored that Biosphere 2 was an experiment the place the surprising would happen, including to data of how complicated ecologies develop and work together, not an indication the place every part was recognized prematurely.[57] H. T. Odum famous: “The administration course of throughout 1992–1993 utilizing knowledge to develop idea, take a look at it with simulation, and apply corrective actions was in the most effective scientific custom. But some journalists crucified the administration within the public press, treating the mission as if it was an Olympic contest to see how a lot may very well be accomplished with out opening the doorways”.[58]

The oxygen inside the ability, which started at 20.9%, fell at a gradual tempo and after 16 months was all the way down to 14.5%. That is equal to the oxygen availability at an elevation of 4,080 metres (13,390 ft).[59] Since some biospherians have been beginning to have symptoms like sleep apnea and fatigue, Walford and the medical group determined to spice up oxygen with injections in January and August 1993. The oxygen decline and minimal response of the crew indicated that modifications in air stress are what set off human adaptation responses. These research enhanced the biomedical analysis program.[60]

Tunnel entry to South Lung

Managing CO2 ranges was a specific problem, and a supply of controversy relating to the Biosphere 2 mission’s alleged misrepresentation to the general public. Every day fluctuation of carbon dioxide dynamics was usually 600 ppm due to the sturdy drawdown throughout daylight hours by plant photosynthesis, adopted by an identical rise in the course of the nighttime when system respiration dominated. As anticipated, there was additionally a powerful seasonal signature to CO2 ranges, with wintertime ranges as excessive as 4,000–4,500 ppm and summertime ranges close to 1,000 ppm. The crew labored to handle the CO2 by often turning on a CO2 scrubber, activating and de-activating the desert and savannah by means of management of irrigation water, reducing and storing biomass to sequester carbon, and using all potential planting areas with fast-growing species to extend system photosynthesis.[61] In November 1991, investigative reporting in The Village Voice alleged that the crew had secretly put in the CO2 scrubber machine, and claimed that this violated Biosphere 2’s marketed objective of recycling all supplies naturally.[62] Others pointed on the market was nothing secret concerning the carbon dioxide machine and it constituted one other technical system augmenting ecological processes. The carbon precipitator might reverse the chemical reactions and thus launch the saved carbon dioxide in later years when the ability would possibly want further carbon.[61]

The soils have been chosen to have sufficient carbon to offer for the crops of the ecosystems to develop from infancy to maturity, a plant mass improve of maybe 20 brief tons (18,000 kg).[63] The discharge charge of that soil carbon as carbon dioxide by respiration of soil microbes was an unknown that the Biosphere 2 experiment was designed to disclose. Subsequent analysis confirmed that Biosphere 2’s farm soils had reached a extra steady ratio of carbon and nitrogen, reducing the speed of CO2 launch, by 1998.[64]

The respiration charge was quicker than the photosynthesis (presumably partially resulting from comparatively low mild penetration by means of the glazed construction and the truth that Biosphere 2 began with a small however quickly rising plant biomass) leading to a sluggish lower of oxygen. A thriller accompanied the oxygen decline: the corresponding improve in carbon dioxide didn’t seem. This hid the underlying course of till an investigation by Jeff Severinghaus and Wallace Broecker of Columbia College’s Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory utilizing isotopic evaluation confirmed that carbon dioxide was reacting with uncovered concrete inside Biosphere 2 to type calcium carbonate in a course of known as carbonatation, thereby sequestering each carbon and oxygen.[65]

Second mission[edit]

Reverse osmosis tanks in Biosphere 2 basement, often known as the technosphere

After Biosphere 2’s first mission, intensive analysis and system enhancements have been undertaken, together with sealing concrete to stop the uptake of carbon dioxide. The second mission started on March 6, 1994, with an introduced run of ten months. The crew was Norberto Alvarez-Romo (Capt.), John Druitt, Matt Finn, Pascale Maslin, Charlotte Godfrey, Rodrigo Romo and Tilak Mahato. The second crew achieved full sufficiency in meals manufacturing.[7]

On April 1, 1994, a extreme dispute inside the administration group led to the ousting of the on-site administration by federal marshals serving a restraining order, and financier Ed Bass employed Steve Bannon, then-manager of the Bannon & Co. funding banking group from Beverly Hills, California, to run House Biospheres Ventures. The mission was put into receivership and an out of doors administration group was put in for the receiver to show across the floundering mission. The explanation for the dispute was threefold. Mismanagement of the mission had induced horrible publicity, monetary mismanagement and lack of analysis. Individuals[who?] alleged gross monetary mismanagement of the mission, resulting in a lack of $25 million in fiscal yr 1992.[66] Some crew members and workers have been involved about Bannon, who had beforehand investigated value overruns on the web site; two former Biosphere 2 crew members flew again to Arizona to protest the rent and broke into the compound to warn the crew members that Bannon and the brand new administration would jeopardize their security.[67]

At 3 a.m. on April 5, 1994, Abigail Alling and Mark Van Thillo, members of the primary crew, allegedly vandalized the mission from exterior,[68] opening one double-airlock door and three single door emergency exits, leaving them open for about quarter-hour. 5 panes of glass have been additionally damaged. Alling later informed the Chicago Tribune that she “thought of the Biosphere to be in an emergency state … By no means was it sabotage. It was my duty.”[69] About 10% of the Biosphere’s air was exchanged with the surface throughout this time, in line with programs analyst Donella Meadows, who acquired a communication from Alling saying that she and Van Thillo judged it their moral obligation to present these inside the selection of constant with the drastically modified human experiment or leaving, as they did not know what the crew had been informed of the brand new state of affairs. “On April 1, 1994, at roughly 10 AM … limousines arrived on the biosphere web site … with two funding bankers employed by Mr. Bass … They arrived with a brief restraining order to take over direct management of the mission … With them have been 6-8 cops employed by the Bass group … They instantly modified locks on the places of work … All communication programs have been modified (phone and entry codes), and [we] have been prevented from receiving any knowledge relating to security, operations, and analysis of Biosphere 2.” Alling emphasised a number of instances in her letter that the “bankers” who abruptly took over “knew nothing technically or scientifically, and little concerning the biospherian crew”.[70]

4 days later, the captain Norberto Alvarez-Romo (by then married to Biosphere 2 chief government Margaret Augustine) precipitously left the Biosphere for a “household emergency” after his spouse’s suspension.[69] He was changed by Bernd Zabel, who had been nominated as captain of the primary mission however who was changed on the final minute. Two months later, Matt Smith changed Matt Finn.[citation needed]

The possession and administration firm House Biospheres Ventures was dissolved on June 1, 1994. This left the scientific and enterprise administration of the mission to the interim turnaround group, who had been contracted by the monetary companion, Selections Funding Co.[59]

Mission 2 was ended prematurely on September 6, 1994. No additional complete system science has emerged from Biosphere 2 as the ability was modified by Columbia College from a closed ecological system to a “flow-through” system the place CO2 may very well be manipulated at desired ranges.[59]

See Also

Steve Bannon left Biosphere 2 after two years, however his departure was marked by an “abuse of course of” civil lawsuit filed in opposition to House Biosphere Ventures by the previous crew members who had damaged in.[71] Main managers of Biosphere 2 from the unique founding group said each abusive behaviour by Bannon and others, and that the bankers’ precise objective was to destroy the experiment.[72] Throughout a 1996 trial, Bannon testified that he had known as one of many plaintiffs, Abigail Alling, a “self-centered, deluded younger lady” and a “bimbo”.[73] He additionally testified that when the lady submitted a five-page criticism outlining security issues on the web site, he promised to shove the criticism “down her throat”. Bannon attributed this to “arduous emotions and damaged desires”.[74] On the finish of the trial, the court docket dominated in favor of the plaintiffs and ordered House Biosphere Ventures to pay them $600,000, but in addition ordered the plaintiffs to pay the corporate $40,089 for the injury they’d induced.[67]


Mangrove wetlands biome inside Biosphere 2

A particular subject of the Ecological Engineering journal edited by Marino and Howard T. Odum was printed in 1999 as “Biosphere 2: Analysis Previous and Current” represents essentially the most complete assemblage of collected papers and findings from Biosphere 2.[75] The papers vary from calibrated fashions that describe the system metabolism, hydrologic stability, and warmth and humidity, to papers that describe rainforest, mangrove, ocean, and agronomic system improvement on this carbon dioxide-rich setting.[76][77] Although a number of dissertations and lots of scientific papers used knowledge from the early closure experiments at Biosphere 2, a lot of the unique knowledge has by no means been analyzed and is unavailable or misplaced, maybe resulting from scientific politics and in-fighting.[24][44]

The historian of science Rebecca Redier has claimed that as a result of Biosphere 2’s creators have been perceived as outsiders to educational science, the mission was scrutinized however poorly understood within the media, and that this scrutiny ceased after Columbia College assumed administration, as a result of it was assumed they have been “correct” scientists.[41]

Reward and criticism[edit]

Contained in the rainforest biome in Biosphere 2 in 2009

One view of Biosphere 2 was that it was “essentially the most thrilling scientific mission to be undertaken in the USA since President John F. Kennedy launched us towards the moon”.[78] Others known as it “New Age drivel masquerading as science”.[79] John Allen and Roy Walford did have mainstream credentials. John Allen held a level in Metallurgical-Mining Engineering from the Colorado College of Mines, and an MBA from the Harvard Enterprise College.[25][80] Roy Walford acquired his doctorate of medication from the College of Chicago and taught at UCLA as a Professor of Pathology for 35 years. Mark Nelson obtained his Ph.D. in 1998 underneath Professor H.T. Odum in ecological engineering additional growing the constructed wetlands used to deal with and recycle sewage in Biosphere 2,[81] to coral reef safety alongside the Yucatán coast the place the corals have been collected.[82] Linda Leigh obtained her PhD with a dissertation on biodiversity and the Biosphere 2 rainforest working with Odum.[83] Abigail Alling, Mark van Thillo and Sally Silverstone helped begin the Biosphere Basis the place they labored on coral reef and marine conservation and sustainable agricultural programs.[84] Jane Poynter and Taber MacCallum co-founded Paragon Space Development Corporation which has studied the primary mini-closed system and the primary full animal life cycle in area and assisted in setting world information in excessive altitude descents.[85]

Questioning the credentials of the individuals (regardless of the contribution within the preparation section of Biosphere 2 of worldwide top-level scientists and amongst others the Russian Academy of Sciences), Marc Cooper wrote that “the group that constructed, conceived, and directs the Biosphere mission just isn’t a bunch of high-tech researchers on the reducing fringe of science however a clique of recycled theater performers that advanced out of an authoritarian—and decidedly non-scientific—persona cult”.[86] He was referring to the Synergia Ranch in New Mexico, the place certainly lots of the Biospherians did follow theater underneath John Allen’s management, and started to develop the concepts behind Biosphere 2.[87] Additionally they based the Institute of Ecotechnics[88] and started revolutionary area initiatives in difficult biomes to advance the wholesome integration of human applied sciences and the setting the place lots of the biospherian candidates gained expertise in working real-time complicated initiatives.[89][90]

One among their very own scientific consultants was earlier important. Dr. Ghillean Prance, director of the Royal Botanical Gardens in Kew, designed the rainforest biome contained in the Biosphere. Though he later modified his opinion, acknowledging the distinctive scope of this experiment and contributed to its success as a marketing consultant, in a 1983 interview (8 years earlier than the beginning of the experiment), Prance mentioned, “I used to be interested in the Institute of Ecotechnics as a result of funds for analysis have been being lower and the institute appeared to have some huge cash which it was keen to spend freely. Together with others, I used to be ill-used. Their curiosity in science just isn’t real. They appear to have some type of secret agenda, they appear to be guided by some type of spiritual or philosophical system.” Prance went on within the 1991 newspaper interview to say “they’re visionaries … And perhaps to meet their imaginative and prescient they’ve change into considerably cultlike. However they aren’t a cult, per se … I’m fascinated with ecological restoration programs. And I feel all kinds of scientific issues can come of this experiment, far past the area objective … Once they got here to me with this new mission, they appeared so effectively organized, so impressed, I merely determined to neglect the previous. You should not maintain their previous in opposition to them.”[91]

Poynter in her memoir rebuts the critique that as a result of among the inventive group of Biosphere 2 weren’t credentialed scientists, the outcomes of the endeavor are invalid. “Some reporters hurled accusations that we have been unscientific. Apparently as a result of lots of the SBV managers weren’t themselves degreed scientists, this known as into query the whole validity of the mission, despite the fact that among the world’s greatest scientists have been working vigorously on the mission’s design and operation. The critique was not truthful. Since leaving Biosphere 2, I’ve run a small enterprise for ten years that despatched experiments on the shuttle and to the area station, and is designing life assist programs for the substitute shuttle and future moon base. I do not need a level, not even an MBA from Harvard, as John [Allen] had. I rent scientists and prime engineers. Our firm’s credibility just isn’t known as into query due to my credentials: we’re judged on the standard of our work”.[92] H.T. Odum famous that mavericks and outsiders have usually contributed to the event of science: “The unique administration of Biosphere 2 was regarded by many scientists as untrained for lack of scientific levels, despite the fact that they’d engaged in a preparatory examine program for a decade, interacting with the worldwide neighborhood of scientists together with the Russians concerned with closed programs. The historical past of science has many examples the place individuals of atypical background open science in new instructions, on this case implementing mesocosm group and ecological engineering with contemporary hypotheses”.[93]

The Biosphere 2 Science Advisory Committee, chaired by Tom Lovejoy of the Smithsonian Establishment, in its report of August 1992 reported: “The committee is in settlement that the conception and development of Biosphere 2 have been acts of imaginative and prescient and braveness. The size of Biosphere 2 is exclusive and Biosphere 2 is already offering surprising scientific outcomes not potential by means of different means (notably the documented, surprising decline in atmospheric oxygen ranges.) Biosphere 2 will make necessary scientific contributions within the fields of biogeochemical biking, the ecology of closed ecological programs, and restoration ecology.” Columbia College assembled exterior scientists to guage the potential of the ability after they took over administration, and concluded the next: “A gaggle of world-class scientists bought collectively and determined the Biosphere 2 facility is an distinctive laboratory for addressing important questions relative to the way forward for Earth and its setting.”[94]

Ongoing analysis following the preliminary enclosure has produced optimistic outcomes for ecological understanding. Mark Nelson writes, “A number of years of analysis on Biosphere 2’s ocean demonstrated the devastating impacts from elevated atmospheric CO2 … coral reef was studied at 200 ppm, 350 ppm, 700 ppm, and 1200 ppm of CO2. Corals grew twice as quick on the decrease ranges … in comparison with the 350 ppm ranges within the 1990’s Earth ambiance. … At 1200 ppm, coral progress declined 90 p.c.” Frank Press, a former secretary for the Nationwide Academy of Sciences, described the interplay as, “the primary unequivocal experimental affirmation of the human influence on the planet”.[95]

Administration by Columbia College[edit]

In December 1995, the Biosphere 2 house owners transferred administration to Columbia University of New York Metropolis.[96] Columbia ran Biosphere 2 as a analysis web site and campus till 2003.[97] Subsequently, administration reverted to the house owners.

In 1996, Columbia College modified the nearly hermetic, materially closed construction designed for closed system analysis, to a “flow-through” system, and halted closed system analysis. They manipulated carbon dioxide ranges for global warming analysis, and injected desired quantities of carbon dioxide, venting as wanted.[98] Throughout Columbia’s tenure, college students from Columbia and different faculties and universities would usually spend one semester on the web site.[99]

Analysis throughout Columbia’s tenure demonstrated the devastating impacts on coral reefs from elevated atmospheric CO2 and acidification that may consequence from continued world local weather change.[100] Frank Press, former president of the Nationwide Academy of Sciences, described these interactions between ambiance and ocean, making the most of the extremely controllable ocean mesocosm of Biosphere 2, because the “first unequivocal experimental affirmation of the human influence on the planet”.[101]

Research in Biosphere 2’s terrestrial biomes confirmed {that a} saturation level was reached with elevated CO2 past which they’re unable to uptake extra. The research’ authors famous that the placing variations between the Biosphere 2 rainforest and desert biomes of their entire system responses “illustrates the significance of large-scale experimental analysis within the examine of complicated world change points”.[102]

Website offered[edit]

In January 2005, Selections Investments Company, proprietor of Biosphere 2, introduced that the mission’s 1,600-acre (650 ha) campus was on the market. They most well-liked a analysis use to be discovered for the complicated however weren’t excluding consumers with completely different intentions, equivalent to massive universities, church buildings, resorts, and spas.[103] In June 2007, the location was offered for $50 million to CDO Ranching & Improvement, L.P. 1,500 homes and a resort resort have been deliberate, however the primary construction was nonetheless to be out there for analysis and academic use.[104]

Acquisition by College of Arizona[edit]

On June 26, 2007, the University of Arizona introduced it could take over analysis on the Biosphere 2. The announcement ended fears that the construction can be demolished. College officers mentioned non-public items and grants enabled them to cowl analysis and working prices for 3 years with the potential of extending funding for ten years.[105] It was prolonged for ten years, and engaged in analysis initiatives together with analysis into the terrestrial water cycle and the way it pertains to ecology, atmospheric science, soil geochemistry, and local weather change. One among these items in 2009 included 470 photovoltaic photo voltaic panels added to the location.[106] In June 2011, the college introduced that it could assume full possession of Biosphere 2, efficient July 1.[107]

CDO Ranching & Improvement donated the land, Biosphere buildings and a number of other different assist and administrative buildings. In 2011, the Philecology Basis (a nonprofit analysis basis based by Ed Bass) pledged US$20 million for the continuing science and operations.[107] In 2017, Ed Bass donated one other $30 million to the College of Arizona in assist of Biosphere 2, endowing two educational positions and establishing the “Philecology Biospheric Analysis Endowment Fund”.[108]

Science camps are additionally held on the premises. These have included a week-long ‘area camp’ for college undergraduates, and in a single day camps for varsity college students.[109][110] In 2011 it was reported that there have been a mean of 100,000 guests per yr visiting the Biosphere 2 campus.[111]

Later analysis[edit]

Panorama Evolution Observatory (LEO) at Biosphere 2 which is a 30 meter by 11 meter mattress of crushed basalt rock extracted from a volcanic crater in northern Arizona targeted on learning the evolution of soil.

There are a lot of small-scale analysis initiatives at Biosphere 2, in addition to a number of large-scale analysis initiatives together with:

  • the Panorama Evolution Observatory (LEO), a mission which makes use of 1,800 sensors to watch hundreds of thousands of kilos of abiotic volcanic rock to trace how this nonliving soil slowly develops over a number of years right into a wealthy soil which is ready to assist microbial and vascular plant life. Structurally, this concerned constructing three massive steel-framed “hillsides” contained in the pre-existing domes because the world’s largest weighing lysimeter, with design and implementation development constrained by the restricted accessibility into the present construction.[112]
  • the Lunar Greenhouse, a second prototype of the Controlled Environment Agriculture Center which seeks to know find out how to develop greens on the Moon or Mars by growing a bioregenerative life support system which recycles and purifies water by means of plant transpiration.[113][114]
  • a vertical farming mission to be inbuilt Biosphere 2’s west lung, in collaboration with the non-public firm Civic Farms,[115] in an effort to develop an indoor plant progress cycle with LED lamps configured to particular wavelengths aimed on the objective of accelerating water effectivity, producing zero farm runoff, with no pests or pesticides, and 0 impact from exterior climate situations.[116]

In in style tradition[edit]

See additionally[edit]


  1. ^ a b Zimmer, Carl (March 29, 2019). “The Lost History of One of the World’s Strangest Scientific Experiments – The hummingbirds were dying. Cockroaches were everywhere. And then Steve Bannon showed up”. The New York Times. Retrieved March 29, 2019.
  2. ^ a b “Fast Facts: Biosphere 2”.
  3. ^ Bahr, Jeff (2009). Superb and Uncommon USA. Publications Worldwide, Ltd. p. 238. ISBN 978-1-4127-1683-3.
  4. ^ “Biosphere II Project facts, information, pictures | articles about Biosphere II Project”. Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  5. ^ Nelson, Mark; Burgess, Tony L; Alling, Abigail; Alvarez-Romo, Norberto; Dempster, William F; Walford, Roy L; Allen, John P (1993). “Utilizing a Closed Ecological System to Research Earth’s Biosphere”. BioScience. 43 (4): 225–236. doi:10.2307/1312123. JSTOR 1312123.
  6. ^ Nelson, Mark (2018). Pushing the Limits: Insights from Biosphere 2. Tucson AZ: College of Arizona. ISBN 978-0-8165-3732-7.
  7. ^ a b Marino, Bruno D.V; Mahato, Tilak Ram; Druitt, John W; Leigh, Linda; Lin, Guanghui; Russell, Robert M; Tubiello, Francesco N (1999). “The agricultural biome of Biosphere 2”. Ecological Engineering. 13 (1–4): 199–234. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00100-1.
  8. ^ a b c Broad, William J. (1991-09-24). “As Biosphere Is Sealed, Its Patron Reflects on Life”. The New York Occasions. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-06-06.
  9. ^ Tulshyan, Ruchika (July 28, 2010). “Top 50 American Roadside Attractions: Biosphere 2, Oracle, Ariz.” Time.
  10. ^ John Allen, FLS. “Buckminster Fuller’s Synergetic Algorithm and Challenges of the Twenty-First Century”.
  11. ^ Paul Makovsky (July 1, 2008). “The Fuller Effect”. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  12. ^ Dempster, William (1994). “Strategies for measurement and management of leakage in CELSS and their software and efficiency within the Biosphere 2 facility”. Advances in House Analysis. 14 (11): 331–335. Bibcode:1994AdSpR..14k.331D. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(94)90318-2. PMID 11540202.
  13. ^ Dempster, William F (2008). “Tightly closed ecological programs reveal atmospheric subtleties – expertise from Biosphere 2”. Advances in House Analysis. 42 (12): 1951–1956. Bibcode:2008AdSpR..42.1951D. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.105.
  14. ^ Dempster, William F. “Patent for “Pressure balancing a closed ecological system”. U.S. Patent & Trademark Workplace. Retrieved 7 Might 2023.
  15. ^ Zabel, Bernd; Hawes, Phil; Stuart, Hewitt; Marino, Bruno D.V (1999). “Development and engineering of a created setting: Overview of the Biosphere 2 closed system”. Ecological Engineering. 13 (1–4): 43–63. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00091-3.
  16. ^ Dempster, William F (1999). “Biosphere 2 engineering design”. Ecological Engineering. 13 (1–4): 31–42. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00090-1.
  17. ^ “3. September 26, 1991, to April 1, 1994, Biosphere 2 Organization”. 2011-08-12.
  18. ^ Turner, Christopher (Spring 2011). “Ingestion / Planet in a Bottle”. Cabinet Magazine. Retrieved 2011-10-20.
  19. ^ Silverstone, S.E; Nelson, M (1996). “Meals manufacturing and diet in Biosphere 2: Outcomes from the primary mission September 1991 to September 1993”. Advances in House Analysis. 18 (4–5): 49–61. Bibcode:1996AdSpR..18d..49S. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(95)00861-8. PMID 11538814.
  20. ^ Harwood, Richard (1993). “There Is No Away”. Biosphere 2 Publication. 3 (3): 9.
  21. ^ Walford, R. L; Mock, D; Verdery, R; MacCallum, T (2002). “Calorie restriction in biosphere 2: Alterations in physiologic, hematologic, hormonal, and biochemical parameters in humans restricted for a 2-year period”. The Journals of Gerontology. Sequence A, Organic Sciences and Medical Sciences. 57 (6): B211–24. doi:10.1093/gerona/57.6.b211. PMID 12023257.
  22. ^ Walford, R. L; Harris, S. B; Gunion, M. W (1992). “The calorically restricted low-fat nutrient-dense diet in Biosphere 2 significantly lowers blood glucose, total leukocyte count, cholesterol, and blood pressure in humans”. Proceedings of the Nationwide Academy of Sciences of the USA of America. 89 (23): 11533–11537. Bibcode:1992PNAS…8911533W. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.23.11533. PMC 50586. PMID 1454844.
  23. ^ Weyer, Christian; Walford, Roy L; Harper, Inge T; Milner, Mike; MacCallum, Taber; Tataranni, P Antonio; Ravussin, Eric (2000). “Energy metabolism after 2 y of energy restriction: The Biosphere 2 experiment”. The American Journal of Medical Vitamin. 72 (4): 946–953. doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.4.946. PMID 11010936.
  24. ^ a b Allen, J.P; Nelson, M; Alling, A (2003). “The legacy of biosphere 2 for the examine of biospherics and closed ecological programs”. Advances in House Analysis. 31 (7): 1629–1639. Bibcode:2003AdSpR..31.1629A. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00103-0. PMID 14503500.
  25. ^ a b Allen, John (December 1991). Biosphere 2: The Human Experiment. ISBN 978-0140153927.
  26. ^ Nelson, M; Dempster, W. F (1995). “Residing in area: Outcomes from Biosphere 2’s preliminary closure, an early testbed for closed ecological programs on Mars”. Life Assist & Biosphere Science: Worldwide Journal of Earth House. 2 (2): 81–102. Bibcode:1996smgh.conf..363N. PMID 11538313.
  27. ^ Finn, M. (1996). Comparison of Mangrove Forest Structure and Function in a Mesocosm and Florida (Ph.D. dissertation). Washington D.C: Georgetown College. ProQuest 304233980.
  28. ^ Finn, Matt; Kangas, Patrick; Adey, Walter (1999). “Mangrove ecosystem improvement in Biosphere 2”. Ecological Engineering. 13 (1–4): 173–178. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00097-4.
  29. ^ Nelson, Mark; Dempster, W.F; Allen, J.P (2009). “The water cycle in closed ecological programs: Views from the Biosphere 2 and Laboratory Biosphere programs”. Advances in House Analysis. 44 (12): 1404–1412. Bibcode:2009AdSpR..44.1404N. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2009.06.008.
  30. ^ college-level textbook Biology by Neil Campbell and Jane Reece
  31. ^ Wetterer, J. Ok; Miller, S. E; Wheeler, D. E; Olson, C. A; Polhemus, D. A; Pitts, M; Ashton, I. W; Himler, A. G; Yospin, M. M; Helms, Ok. R; Harken, E. L; Gallaher, J; Dunning, C. E; Nelson, M; Litsinger, J; Southern, A; Burgess, T. L (1999). “Ecological Dominance by Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), an Invasive Tramp Ant, in Biosphere 2”. The Florida Entomologist. 82 (3): 381–388. doi:10.2307/3496865. JSTOR 3496865.
  32. ^ Leigh, Linda S; Burgess, Tony; Marino, Bruno D.V; Wei, Yong Dan (1999). “Tropical rainforest biome of Biosphere 2: Construction, composition and outcomes of the primary 2 years of operation”. Ecological Engineering. 13 (1–4): 65–93. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00092-5.
  33. ^ Cohen, J. E; Tilman, D (1996). “Biosphere 2 and Biodiversity–The Classes So Far”. Science. 274 (5290): 1150–1151. Bibcode:1996Sci…274.1150C. doi:10.1126/science.274.5290.1150. PMID 8966587. S2CID 38408928.
  34. ^ “Science Notes 2000 — Only the Lonely”.
  35. ^ Poynter, op. cit.
  36. ^ “Biosphere 2 crewmember & author Jane Poynter interview”. September 19, 2006. Archived from the original on 2007-05-21 – through YouTube.
  37. ^ Analog Studies for Long Duration Human Spaceflight. A Comprehensive Literature Review. Strasbourg, France.: (Worldwide House College. 2009. pp. 11–29.
  38. ^ Poynter, pp.267-8
  39. ^ a b Nelson, M; Grey, Ok; Allen, J. P (2015). “Group dynamics challenges: Insights from Biosphere 2 experiments”. Life Sciences in House Analysis. 6: 79–86. Bibcode:2015LSSR….6…79N. doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2015.07.003. PMID 26256631.
  40. ^ Alling, A; Nelson, M; Silverstone, S; Van Thillo, M (2002). “Human issue observations of the Biosphere 2, 1991-1993, closed life assist human experiment and its software to a long-term manned mission to Mars”. Life Assist & Biosphere Science: Worldwide Journal of Earth House. 8 (2): 71–82. PMID 11987306.
  41. ^ a b Reider, Rebecca (2009). Dreaming the Biosphere. College of New Mexico Press. ISBN 9780826346742.
  42. ^ Poynter, p. 270
  43. ^ Poynter, p. 270, quoting Time journal.
  44. ^ a b Nelson, Mark. Pushing Our Limits: Insights from Biosphere 2. op. cit.
  45. ^ Redman, L. M; Ravussin, E (2011). “Caloric Restriction in Humans: Impact on Physiological, Psychological, and Behavioral Outcomes”. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 14 (2): 275–287. doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3253. PMC 3014770. PMID 20518700. regardless of the selective restriction in energy and marked weight reduction, all crew members remained in wonderful well being and sustained a excessive stage of bodily and psychological exercise all through the whole 2 years.
  46. ^ Poynter, pp.167-173
  47. ^ Poynter, p. 247.
  48. ^ Poynter, p.249
  49. ^ Harrison, Albert A; Clearwater, Yvonne A; McKay, Christopher P (January 1991). From Antarctica to Outer House: Life in Isolation and Confinement. pp. 217–227. ISBN 9780387973104.
  50. ^ Demick, Jack; Takahashi, T; Wapner, Seymour; Takiji Yamamoto, C (1996-11-30). Handbook of Japan-United States Surroundings-Conduct Analysis: Towards a Transactional Strategy. pp. 235–244. ISBN 9780306453403.
  51. ^ Nelson, Mark. Pushing our Limits. op. cit. p. 204.
  52. ^ “Weird Arizona”.
  53. ^ Highfield, Roger (14 January 2004). “Big trouble in the bio bubble …” The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the unique on 6 January 2018. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
  54. ^ Alling, Abigail; Nelson, Mark; Silverstone, Sally (1993-09-23). Life Beneath Glass: The Inside Story of Biosphere 2. ISBN 978-1882428076.
  55. ^ Nelson, Mark (2018-02-27). Pushing Our Limits: Insights from Biosphere 2. ISBN 9780816537327.
  56. ^ “Pittsburgh Post-Gazette – Google News Archive Search”.
  57. ^ Dempster, William (June 24, 2017). “Biosphere 2 was science not a stunt”. Vice Motherboard. Retrieved January 5, 2018.[dead link]
  58. ^ Odum, H. T. (1996). “Scales of ecological engineering”. Ecological Engineering. 6 (1–3): 7–19. CiteSeerX doi:10.1016/0925-8574(95)00049-6.
  59. ^ a b c “BIOSPHERE 2: The Experiment”. Retrieved 2017-01-14.
  60. ^ Walford, R. L; Bechtel, R; McCallum, T; Paglia, D. E; Weber, L. J (1996). ““Biospheric medication” as seen from the two-year first closure of Biosphere 2″. Aviation, House, and Environmental Medication. 67 (7): 609–17. PMID 8830939.
  61. ^ a b Nelson, M; Dempster, W; Alvarez-Romo, N; MacCallum, T (1994). “Atmospheric dynamics and bioregenerative applied sciences in a soil-based ecological life assist system: Preliminary outcomes from biosphere 2”. Advances in House Analysis. 14 (11): 417–426. Bibcode:1994AdSpR..14k.417N. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(94)90331-X. PMID 11540215.
  62. ^ Broad, William J. (November 12, 1991). “Recycling Claim by Biosphere 2 Experiment Is Questioned”. New York Occasions.
  63. ^ Nelson and Dempster, 1996, op cit.
  64. ^ Torbert, H. A.; Johnson, H. B. (2001). “Soil of the intensive agriculture biome of Biosphere 2”. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 56 (1): 4–11.
  65. ^ Severing Haus, Jeffrey P; Broecker, Wallace S; Dempster, William F; McCallum, Taber; Wahlen, Martin (1994). “Oxygen loss in biosphere 2”. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 75 (3): 33. Bibcode:1994EOSTr..75…33S. doi:10.1029/94EO00285.
  66. ^ Poynter, pp. 325–26
  67. ^ a b Murphy, Tim (August 26, 2016). “Trump’s Campaign CEO Ran a Secretive Sci-Fi Project in the Arizona Desert”. Mom Jones.
  68. ^ “Two Former Biosphere Workers Are Accused of Sabotaging Dome”. The New York Occasions. April 5, 1994. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
  69. ^ a b de Lama, George (April 16, 1994). “Biosphere 2 Proves A Hothouse For Trouble: Project Yields A Crop Of Rivalry, Confusion”. Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on August 19, 2014.
  70. ^ “Biosphere 2 Teaches Us Another Lesson”.
  71. ^ Stern, Eric (Might 24, 1996). “Manager vowed revenge on Alling, her lawyer says”. Tucson Citizen. Archived from the original on 2016-11-15.
  72. ^ Mayer, Ralo. “How Steve Bannon Wrecked a World well before he went for this one”. Retrieved January 7, 2018.
  73. ^ “Abigail Kingsley Alling Resume”. Retrieved January 6, 2018.
  74. ^ Cole, Samantha (November 15, 2016). “The Strange History of Steve Bannon and the Biosphere 2 Experiment”. Vice: Motherboard.
  75. ^ Biosphere 2: Research Past and Present. Marino, B. D. V. (Bruno D. V.), Odum, Howard T. (Howard Thomas), 1924-2002. [Amsterdam?]: Elsevier Science. 1999. ISBN 0-08-043208-5. OCLC 42659686.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  76. ^ For an entire record of Biosphere 2 scientific papers and publications see “Biosphere 2 Publications”. Archived from the original on 2008-12-25. Retrieved 2009-02-19..
  77. ^ For analysis initiatives and consultants in the course of the first closure experiment: “International Conferences on Biospherics”. Archived from the original on 2010-01-10. Retrieved 2009-02-19.
  78. ^ Uncover, Might 1987.
  79. ^ Ecology, 73(2), 1992, p.713
  80. ^ Ibid.
  81. ^ Nelson, M. (1999). “Bioregenerative recycle of wastewater in Biosphere 2 utilizing a created wetland: two yr outcomes”. Ecological Engineering. 13: 189–197. CiteSeerX doi:10.1016/s0925-8574(98)00099-8.
  82. ^ Nelson, Mark. 1998. Limestone Wetland Mesocosm for Recycling Saline Wastewater in Coastal Yucatan, Mexico. PhD dissertation, College of Florida.
  83. ^ Leigh, Leigh (1999). Foundation for Rainforest Range and Biosphere 2. College of Florida Ph.D. Dissertation.
  84. ^ “The Biosphere Foundation”.
  85. ^ “Paragon Space Development Corporation”. Retrieved January 3, 2018.
  86. ^ Cooper, Marc. “Take This Terrarium and Shove It”, Village Voice, 1991.
  87. ^ Poynter, pp. 17–20
  88. ^ “The Institute of Ecotechnics”. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  89. ^ Allen, J; Parrish, T; Nelson, M (1984). “The Institute of Ecotechnics An institute dedicated to growing the self-discipline of relating technosphere to biosphere”. The Environmentalist. 4 (3): 205–218. doi:10.1016/S0251-1088(84)92033-3.
  90. ^ Nelson, Mark. Pushing our Limits: Insights from Biosphere 2. op. cit.
  91. ^ Phoenix New Times, June 19, 1991.
  92. ^ Poynter, Jane. The Human Experiment: Two Years and Twenty Minutes Inside Biosphere 2. op. cit.
  93. ^ Odum, H.T. “Scales of Ecological Engineering”. Op. Cit.
  94. ^ Dr. Michael Crow, Vice-Provost of Columbia College, Press Launch December 20, 1994.
  95. ^ Nelson, Mark (2018). Pushing Our Limits: Insights from Biosphere 2. Tucson: The College of Arizona Press. ISBN 978-0-8165-3822-5. OCLC 1020443020.
  96. ^ Broad, William J. (1996-11-19). “Paradise Lost: Biosphere Retooled as Atmospheric Nightmare”. The New York Occasions.
  97. ^ Arenson, Karen W. (2003-09-09). “Columbia University Ends Its Association With Biosphere 2”. The New York Occasions.
  98. ^ Marino, B. D. V.; Odum, H. T. (1999). “Biosphere 2, Introduction and analysis progress”. Ecological Engineering. 13: 3–14. CiteSeerX
  99. ^ Criminal, Kendra. “Columbia University Establishes 10 Earth Institute Scholarships”. Columbia Information. Columbia College. Retrieved 28 November 2016.
  100. ^ Langdon, Chris; Takahashi, Taro; Sweeney, Colm; Chipman, Dave; Goddard, John; Marubini, Francesca; Aceves, Heather; Barnett, Heidi; Atkinson, Marlin J (2000). “Impact of calcium carbonate saturation state on the calcification charge of an experimental coral reef”. International Biogeochemical Cycles. 14 (2): 639–654. Bibcode:2000GBioC..14..639L. doi:10.1029/1999GB001195. S2CID 128987509.
  101. ^ Harris, W.C; Graumlich, Lisa. “Biosphere 2: sustainable research for a sustainable planet”. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  102. ^ Lin, Guanghui; Adams, John; Farnsworth, Blake; Wei, Yongdan; Marino, Bruno D. V; Berry, Joseph A (1999). “Ecosystem carbon trade in two terrestrial ecosystem mesocosms underneath altering atmospheric CO 2 concentrations”. Oecologia. 119 (1): 97–108. Bibcode:1999Oecol.119…97L. doi:10.1007/s004420050765. PMID 28308165. S2CID 17789085.
  103. ^ Trembath-Reichert, Elizabeth (2005-02-04). “Biosphere 2 Now for Sale to Highest Bidder”. Columbia Daily Spectator. Retrieved 2016-03-13.
  104. ^ “Biosphere 2 bubble sold to developers”. NBC Information. 2007-06-05.
  105. ^ Ryman, Anne (2007-06-26). “UA to take over Biosphere 2 research”. The Arizona Republic.
  106. ^ Beal, Tom. “Biosphere 2 will be given 470 photovoltaic panels”. Arizona Every day Star. Retrieved 7 Might 2023.
  107. ^ a b “Biosphere 2 to Have a Permanent Home With the UA”. Workplace of College Communications, The College of Arizona. 2011-06-27. Archived from the unique on November 12, 2011. Retrieved 2011-06-27.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  108. ^ “$30M Gift Announced for UA’s Biosphere 2”. UANews. 2017-09-20. Retrieved 2019-04-10.
  109. ^ “Overnight Experiences At Biosphere 2: Residential K-12 Programming”. Biosphere 2. College of Arizona. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  110. ^ Demers, Jasmine (11 August 2019). “First Space Camp at Biosphere 2 helps prepare students for life on Mars”. Arizona Every day Star. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  111. ^ de Dios, John. “A West World of Outreach, Biosphere 2 is a Zion for Science”. Tucson Weekly. Retrieved 7 Might 2023.
  112. ^ Ortega-Gutiérrez, Allan (Nov 2014). “Under the Dome” (PDF). Fashionable Metal Development. American Institute of Metal Development. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  113. ^ “A Greenhouse for the Moon, or Mars”. 22 September 2015.
  114. ^ “8 men and women once sealed themselves inside this enormous fake Mars colony for 2 years — here’s what it’s like today”. 3 Might 2018.
  115. ^ McKay, Betsy (2017-05-14). “A Farm Grows in the City”. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2017-07-03.
  116. ^ Washington, John (March 2017). “Scaling Earth”. Edible Baja Arizona. p. 102. Archived from the original on 2017-07-05. Retrieved 2017-07-03.
  117. ^ “The Real-Life Story Behind ‘Bio-Dome’. 8 February 2020. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  118. ^ “Spaceship Earth”. Sundance Institute. Retrieved 2020-01-23.
  119. ^ Burrows, James (1992-11-12), The Girl in the Plastic Bubble, Cheers, retrieved 2022-11-04


Exterior hyperlinks[edit]

Source Link

What's Your Reaction?
In Love
Not Sure
View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

2022 Blinking Robots.
WordPress by Doejo

Scroll To Top