Now Reading
Interpretation of goal video high quality metrics Video Compression Guru

Interpretation of goal video high quality metrics Video Compression Guru

2023-04-23 23:48:34

 October 26, 2022


Ever-increasing competitors for every person challenges streaming platforms, broadcasters and operators to attempt for the very best achievable video high quality on all kinds of gadgets. To fulfill this aim a lot of them use varied high quality management techniques based mostly on goal metrics. PSNR, SSIM, and VMAF proved to be most generally used and in-demand metrics as proven by wealthy communication expertise with purchasers within the video high quality management filed.

Video streams bear many levels of transcoding on their means from the copyright holder to the top viewer (Determine 1). Every stage of compression leads to knowledge loss and decrease high quality, whereas the continued battle to attain low bitrates results in the looks of undesirable compression artifacts. Subsequently, video high quality management instruments are broadly used to attenuate these detrimental impacts.


Determine 1. Stream path from the supply to viewers

Usually, metrics are used to match encoders/transcoders, choose optimum transcoding settings or present monitoring of the broadcasted stream high quality. Any goal metric is predicated on calculation of the quantitative distinction between the encoded and reference video sequences. In different phrases, the ensuing worth displays solely a quantitative distinction from the supply video with out evaluating the subjective video high quality perceived by a viewer. It supplies objectivity, nonetheless, it makes the outcomes’ interpretation tougher and sophisticated. This text presents a qualitative interpretation of the quantitative values of the metrics.


Check Configurations

A subjective high quality check was carried out to outline the qualitative ranges of metric values. The check was based mostly on the twin stimulus impairment scale (DSIS) [1]. Respondents had been proven video pairs: a reference video picture and a check video picture. Every pair was demonstrated twice, and after that the respondents had been requested to judge the second video picture as in comparison with the primary one, with out realizing the metric values of the demonstrated movies. The period of a session didn’t exceed half-hour. The algorithm of the analysis check is proven in Determine 2.

Determine 2. Twin Stimulus with Impairment Scale (DSIS) Methodology

Subjective scores had been based mostly on a five-point impairment scale with respondents’ opinions mapped to the values 1 to five, the place 5 means impairments are imperceptible, 4 – impairments are noticeable, however not annoying, 3 – impairments are barely annoying, 2 – impairments are annoying, 1 – impairments are very annoying. Then subjective scores for every check video had been averaged into the imply opinion rating (MOS). The usual deviation and the arrogance interval had been additionally calculated.

Testing Supplies

Testing pattern included 19 YUV video sequences with 8-bit colour depth, 4:2:0 colour subsampling, 1920×1080 pixels decision. Supply video information had been downloaded from and [2, 3]. The pattern included video supplies ranging in dynamics stage (dynamic, medium-dynamic, static scenes) and complexity of movement (rotational movement, water movement, and so on.) (Determine 3).

Determine 3. Pattern of YUV video sequences

Every video was compressed utilizing 15 high quality settings. To hold out the check a complete of 285 AVC/H.264 video sequences had been ready. Video specs: 8-bit colour depth, 4:2:0 colour subsampling, 1920×1080 pixels decision, 25 frames per second body price, progressive scan, and 10 s period. The next metrics had been calculated for every video: PSNR, SSIM, VMAF, VQM, Delta, MSAD, MSE, NQI, and APSNR utilizing –Video High quality Estimator software – part of Elecard StreamEye Studio [4, 5]. 

Stimulus Show

A typical 40” Samsung UE40J6200AU TV with 1920x 1080 decision was used to show the video sequences. Normal brightness and distinction settings had been used. Picture enchancment capabilities had been deliberately disabled. The minimal distance between TV stand and respondents was 1.7 m.


30 Elecard workers participated within the high quality check because the respondents. Amongst these 60% are males, 40% are ladies. The ratio of untrained observers to consultants was 50% to 50%.

Research Outcomes

PSNR — Peak signal-to-noise ratio. PSNR determines the extent of compression distortion and features a imply sq. error (MSE) calculation. The vary of accepted values is 0 to 100. PSNR is expressed as a logarithmic amount utilizing the decibel scale. The upper the worth, the extra particulars stay in a video sequence after compression, and subsequently the upper is the standard. PSNR is a widely known easy metric that doesn’t require complicated calculations, nonetheless, varied research present a low correlation between metric values and physiological human notion [6]. 

PSNR signifies bodily objectively which of the check movies has extra particulars which remained unchanged and fewer noise. Subsequently, PSNR is often used to carry out duties associated to choice of finest working transcoding settings, or optimization and comparability of encoders/transcoders. It’s well-suited for fast willpower which of the encoders/transcoders supplies a better encoding high quality or which set of encoder/transcoder settings supplies extra particulars remaining in a video sequence.

Video high quality PSNR values
Glorious 38 or extra
Good 35-38
Truthful 33-35
Poor 30-33
Dangerous 30 or much less

SSIM is a metric for evaluating picture high quality based mostly on three standards: luminance, distinction and construction [7]. The potential values vary from 0 to 1, the place the upper the worth, the decrease is the picture distortion and the upper is the standard. In comparison with PSNR, SSIM requires extra computing assets.

SSIM is likely one of the first profitable metrics that almost all intently matches the human notion of a picture, which is confirmed by varied analysis checks. Subsequently, SSIM is used for analysis of perceived high quality, for instance, for verifying that streaming video high quality is passable, and so on. SSIM can be used along with PSNR.

Video high quality SSIM worth
Glorious 0,93 or extra
Good 0,88-0,93
Truthful 0,84-0,88
Poor 0,78-0,84
Dangerous 0,78 or much less

VMAF Video Multi-Methodology Evaluation Fusion [8] or Video Multi-Methodology Evaluation Fusion [8] is a metric for analysis of the perceived high quality of a picture. Printed in 2016, it combines a number of totally different metrics that estimate accuracy of visible info, additive distortions and movement. VMAF algorithm was developed utilizing machine studying mannequin. A number of fashions have been produced with a deal with totally different resolutions and the space to the thing (for instance, when analyzing photos encoded for cellphones) together with a separate “VMAF telephone” mannequin.

VMAF reveals research-proven excessive correlation between the metric and the human notion of the picture. Nevertheless, the metric calculation is sort of resource-consuming course of. The VMAF calculation time can exceed the PSNR calculation time by 6–12 instances.

Video high quality VMAF values
Glorious 90 or extra
Good 74-90
Truthful 58-74
Poor 38-58
Dangerous 38 or much less

VQM is a measure of video distortion results. The metric is sort of controversial relating to the correlation with the subjective scores given by viewers. The algorithm performs operations on the DCT cosine rework coefficients. The worth 0 corresponds to finish id of the video sequences and the very best video high quality. The upper the worth of the metric, the higher is the distinction and the more serious is the standard.

Video high quality VQM values
Glorious 0-1,23
Good 1,23-1,74
Truthful 1,74-2,3
Poor 2,33-3,03
Dangerous 3,03 or much less

DELTA – The metric worth displays the variations within the chroma elements. The metric is used to check codecs and filters. DELTA is much less consultant for high quality analysis, and it higher fits the aim of detecting distinction in brightness. For 8-bit video sequences, the values vary from -255 to 255, whereas the upper the metric worth, the higher the distinction. The worth 0 corresponds to finish id of the video sequences.

Video high quality DELTA values
Glorious 0 – 0,144
Good 0,144 – 0,236
Truthful 0,236 – 0,3
Poor 0,3 – 0,369
Dangerous 0,369 or much less

MSAD is calculated the identical means as DELTA, with one exception, particularly the distinction being an absolute worth (modulus). The worth 0 corresponds to finish id of the video sequences, whereas the utmost distinction corresponds to the worth 255 for 8-bit video sequences.

Video high quality MSAD values
Glorious 0 – 2,05
Good 2,05 – 2,67
Truthful 2,67 – 3,22
Poor 3,22 – 3,96
Dangerous 3,96 or extra

MSE is the only metric that measures the common distinction between the estimated values and precise worth (imply squared error). The worth 0 implies that video sequences are utterly equivalent, whereas the utmost distinction corresponds to the worth 65025 for 8-bit colour depth.

See Also

Video high quality MSE values
Glorious 0 – 15,5
Good 15,5 – 28,9
Truthful 28,9 – 47,7
Poor 47,7 – 83,2
Dangerous 83,2 or extra

NQI is a metric designed to judge video high quality by combining three elements: correlation loss, luminance and distinction distortion. The worth vary is 0 to 1. The decrease the worth, the more serious the standard.

Video high quality NQI values
Glorious 0,43 or extra
Good 0,33 – 0,43
Truthful 0,28 – 0,33
Poor 0,21 – 0,28
Dangerous 0 – 0,21


It must be famous that there isn’t any single universally relevant goal metric appropriate for fixing all potential video high quality estimation challenges. The effectiveness of any metric and its correlation with a person’s notion of high quality is dependent upon the dynamics of the video content material, the complexity of the scene compressed, and the standard of the reference video sequence. The research supplies had been chosen in such a fashion to make sure that the interpretation of the metric values matches the standard of various variations of video streams.

All these metrics may be calculated utilizing instruments included into Elecard StreamEye Studio.

Request StreamEye Studio Demo


  1. ITU-R BT.500-14 (10/2019) Suggestion. Methods for the subjective evaluation of TV picture high quality!!PDF-R.pdf 
  2. Video Check Media
  3. Extremely Video Group Dataset
  4. Elecard StreamEye Studio — A set of purposes for skilled video high quality evaluation and error detection in an encoded stream to additional optimize video compression and confirm compliance with requirements.
  5. Elecard Video Quality Estimator — Skilled utility for video high quality evaluation utilizing goal metrics
  6. Janusz Klink,  Tadeus Uhl “Video High quality Evaluation: Some Remarks on Chosen Goal Metrics”
  7. Zhou Wang, Alan Conrad Bovik, Hamid Rahim Sheikh, Eero P. Simoncelli “Picture High quality Evaluation: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity” IEEE transactions on picture processing, vol. 13, no. 4, april 2004
  8. Towards A Sensible Perceptual Video High quality Metric, Netflix Know-how Weblog




Alexander Kruglov

Alexander Kruglov is a number one engineer at Elecard. He has been working in video evaluation since 2018. Alexander is accountable for help of the Elecard’s largest purchasers, similar to Netflix, Cisco, Walt Disney Studios, and so on.






Source Link

What's Your Reaction?
In Love
Not Sure
View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

2022 Blinking Robots.
WordPress by Doejo

Scroll To Top