Now Reading
Resilience, innovation and collapse of settlement networks in later Bronze Age Europe: New survey information from the southern Carpathian Basin

Resilience, innovation and collapse of settlement networks in later Bronze Age Europe: New survey information from the southern Carpathian Basin

2023-11-22 18:00:26

Summary

Societies of the later Early to Center Bronze Age (ca. 2200–1600 BC) within the Carpathian Basin exhibited advanced, hierarchical and regionally influential socio-political organisation that got here to an abrupt finish within the 16th century BC. Thought of a collapse by some, this alteration was characterised by abandonment of nearly all central locations / nodes in settlement networks. Till lately, the complexity that characterised the interval was believed to have considerably diminished alongside depopulation. This mannequin was bolstered by a mixture of the lack of established exterior networks and low-resolution data of the place and the way individuals lived within the first levels of the Late Bronze Age (between 1600 and 1200 BC). We contest the concept of a diminished Late Bronze Age and argue {that a} absolutely reverse trajectory could be recognized–elevated scale, complexity and density in settlement programs and intensification of long-distance networks. We current outcomes of a settlement survey within the southern Pannonian Plain utilizing distant and pedestrian prospection, augmented by small-scale excavations. New absolute dates are used to outline the occupational historical past of websites courting primarily between 1500–1200 BC. We argue that local weather change performed a considerable function in within the transformation of settlement networks, creating a specific ecological area of interest enabling societies to thrive. New and particular types of panorama exploitation developed that have been characterised by proximity to wetlands and minor watercourses. On this context, the most important monuments of Bronze Age Europe have been created and inhabited. In contemplating the origins and demise of those megasites and associated settlements, we offer a brand new mannequin for Late Bronze Age societies within the Carpathian Basin and their regional relevance.

Introduction

The mid-second millennium BC was a time of main transformation in Europe, thought-about to be a key turning level for prehistoric societies [1]. Metallic, which had lengthy served as a status useful resource was more and more used for utilitarian objects, remodeling communities into really metal-using societies that have been depending on it in day by day life and, at a extra macro-scale, its consumption fuelled aggressive political economies [24]. Societies of the Carpathian Basin have lengthy been considered artistic driving forces behind the cultural, trade and political networks that outlined the globalised connections of this time [510]. A number of the most vital overland and river navigational corridors in Europe intersect within the south of that area, notably the Danube and Tisza rivers. Bronze Age analysis there has primarily focussed on societies centred round inform settlements of the later Early and Center Bronze Age (ca. 2100–1600 BC) [11]. At the moment, well-resourced communities created a wealth of fabric tradition indicative of advanced, hierarchical societies. With the abandonment of tells and surrounding websites within the 16th century BC, this social order got here to an abrupt finish. After this, when the kingdoms and empires of the Mediterranean reached their apogee between 1500–1200 BC and lots of European polities grew in complexity, we all know remarkably little about what was occurring within the once-central Carpathian Basin (Fig 1).

thumbnail

Fig 1. Location map of examine are and websites talked about within the textual content.

Black circles: TSG websites; Gray circles: possible TSG websites (not surveyed); white squares: TSG-like websites. 5 = Mokrin; 7 = Gradište-Iđoš; 11 = Novo Miloševo 4; 18 = Novo Miloševo; 25 = Bašaid; 27 = Torda 2; 29 = Kumane 3; 34 = Melenci 2; 39 = Turija-Gradište 41 = Banatski Dvor; 46 = Melenci; 50 = Žitište; 52 = Jankov Most; 65 = Dobrica; 73 = Idvor; 76 = Sakule; 84 = Crepaja; 92 = Glogonj; 93 = Kačarevo 2; 95 = Pančevo; 96 = Pančevo 2-Stari Tamiš; 97 = Dolovo; 102 = Mramorak; 103 = Mramorak 2; 104 = Bavanište; 107 = Újkígyós-Örök-dűlő; 108 = Orosháza Nagytatársánc; 109 = Sântana-Cetatea Veche; 110 = Csanádpalota-Foldvar; 111 = Klárafalva-Hajdova; 112 = Kiszombor-“Juhos Miklos tanya = Uj Elet Tsz”; 113 = Pecica in Vii; 114 = Pecica Şanţul Mare; 115 = Rabe-Anka Siget; 116 = Kanjiža-Ribarski Trg; 117 = Sagu Sit A1_1; 118 = Periam-Movila Santului; 119 = Corneşti-Iarcuri; 120 = Carani; 121 = Satchinez-Râtul Popii; 122 = Ostojićevo-Stari Vinogradi; 123 = Biled-Câmpia Arsă; 124 = Budžak-Livade; 125 = Foeni-Gomila Lupului II; 126 = Foeni-Gomila Lupului I; 127 = Foeni-Cimitirul Ortodox; 128 = Cruceni-Modusi Ut; 129 = Jaša Tomić; 130 = Butin; 131 = Mošorin-Feudvar; 132 = Mošorin-Stubarlija; 133 = Vatin-Bela Bara; 134 = Belegiš-Šančine; 135 = Belegiš-Stojića Gumno; 136 = Orešac-Židovar; 137 = Pančevo-Najeva Ciglana; 138 = Karaburma; 139 = Omoljica–Zlatica. See Table 2 for different TSG websites numbered on this determine (Map by Marta Estanqueiro; basemap hillshade derived from ALOS DSM AW3D30, reprinted from https://www.eorcJaxaJp/ALOS/en/dataset/aw3d30/aw3d30_e.htm underneath a CC BY license, with permission from JAXA -Japan Aerospace Exploration Company, unique copyright 2023).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288750.g001

It has been argued the realm was marginalised in political and financial networks of Europe and the Mediterranean throughout the Late Bronze Age (LBA) [1214]. Nevertheless, we argue on this paper {that a} new internally highly-connected and externally well-networked society emerged after 1600 BC, characterised by a dense and hierarchically organised advanced of enclosed websites. Situated within the south Pannonian Plain space of the Carpathian Basin, these websites have been generally monumental in scale, starting from small websites of 5–10 hectares, by way of bigger ones of many 10’s of hectares as much as the most important website which exceeded 1,750 hectares of area encircled by 33km of ditches and ramparts [1519]. We goal to elucidate how this dense and affluent community got here into existence within the 16th century and why it collapsed within the 13th century BC. We contend that, alongside the Aegean and Po Valley, this newly recognized decrease Pannonian community was one of many main cultural centres of southern Europe, exerting regional scale influences throughout the continent and into the Mediterranean.

We deal with the southeast Pannonian Plain as a result of high quality and amount of latest information from latest excavation programmes and our survey, but in addition as a result of this space was exceptionally (for the area) densely occupied and affluent within the LBA. We embody websites from the realm in and across the historic province of Banat (spanning elements of at present’s Hungary, Romania and Serbia), correlating with the hinterlands of the river Mureș within the north, the river Tisza within the west, the river Danube within the south and fringe of the Transylvanian uplands to the east (Fig 1). Characterised by widespread options in settlement design, mortuary apply, metalwork model and ceramic kinds (notably of the Belegiš custom), shared parts of social replica widespread throughout a large space point out the presence of a socio-political entity that we name the decrease Pannonian community. This was constituted by one to a number of multi-local polities. Every included a number of settlements and shared a core macroculture. Thus far analysis excavation initiatives have focussed on giant and complicated websites that served as central locations. Whereas this has begun to supply some insights into the social world by which these giant websites discovered that means, we contextualise these megasites alongside the heterogenous array of smaller websites that make up an interlinked social panorama [15]. Harding [15] launched the time period megafort to seek advice from the huge enclosed LBA websites of this space. On this paper, we outline megasite or megafort as a person, constructed enclosure (i.e. not a composite of multi-local associated constructions that aren’t bodily linked) that’s considerably bigger than typical throughout all intervals and locations in prehistoric Europe. We advise that an enclosed area of larger than 75 hectares and possessing monumentality vis-à-vis a considerable ditch and / or rampart is contextually significant for the LBA of this area, even when not all websites of this scale had equivalent capabilities.

Our fieldwork has recognized over 100 new websites in part of this area. They’re positioned within the hinterlands of the Tisza river and so we time period them the Tisza Web site Group (TSG). The TSG is a community of extremely comparable websites set inside an space of ca. 8,000 km2, roughly 140km north-south and 80km east-west (S1 File). They’re aligned alongside a broadly north-south axis east of a river hall fashioned by the River Tisza and a north-south stretch of the River Danube. The outcomes of our survey present a fundamental mannequin for settlement frequency, density, organisation and dimension. The distribution and locational decisions make it clear that TSG websites occupied a strategic location alongside vital arterial river routes that related them to one another, continental Europe and onwards to the Adriatic, Black and east Mediterranean seas [20]. We current outcomes of distant prospection, pedestrian survey, focused excavations and new absolute chronological analysis on this TSG cluster and use this to characterise the decrease Pannonian community in its regional and European context.

The panorama, environmental and local weather context of the southern Pannonian Plain 2000–1000 BC

The Carpathian Basin is outlined as a bowl with a mountainous periphery and an exceptionally flat inside (the Pannonian Plain) punctuated by very uncommon and remoted hills or mountains (Fig 1). Options akin to marshes seem to have performed a task in shaping settlement areas in prehistory, however the huge rivers of the plain have been much more formative. They’re broad all yr spherical however when in flood they turn out to be huge watery zones creating seasonal no-man’s land areas. These rivers possess a ‘“yin/yang” character, in that they perform each to hinder and to facilitate motion’, enabling societies to form, work together and maintain giant multi-local social aggregates or maybe polities [20].

To raised perceive the altering environmental context of settlement between the MBA and LBA, and in addition the eventual abandonment of LBA settlements, information for paleoclimatic situations and panorama administration are revealing (Table 1). Research from areas adjoining to the TSG current a constant image. Demény et al.’s [21] examine of a wide range of local weather proxies present the very best decision data and are supported by different speleothem information from Ascunsă, Poleva and Urşilor caves, an ice core from Scărișoara cave, and sediment cores from Lake Brazi and Late Ighiel in western Romania [2226]. Most LBA 1 and a pair of datapoints indicating wetness ranges are beneath these indicating the wettest MBA situations, suggesting persistently greater rainfall. The warmest peaks of LBA 1 and a pair of are simply above the bottom factors for the MBA in Demény et al.’s mannequin, suggesting comparatively cooler LBA situations.

thumbnail

Desk 1. Common traits in local weather proxy information for the southern Pannonian Plain.

This desk is predicated on information from Demény et al. 2019 and supported by information from Drăguşin et al. 2014. Demeny et al. is predicated totally on information from Trio Cave and Dragusin et al. deal with Ascunsă, Poleva, and Ursilor caves. These are positioned ca. 200 km to the west-north-west and east-north-east of the centre of the TSG community respectively. All situations within the determine are relative to these of 2000–1900 BC when this timeline begins. Because the courting of modifications is broadly construed inside century blocks, when peaks happen inside a block, the next trajectory is reverse to the previous one, i.e. if preceded by cooling then following the height, prevailing situations shifted to warming.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288750.t001

When the quantity and complexity of Center Bronze Age (MBA) tells have been growing (broadly 1950–1750 BC), palaeoclimate information point out comparatively heat and dry–however fairly vacillating–situations. Knowledge counsel a gentle enhance in wetness and falling common temperatures from the 17th to mid-16th century BC [21]. The identical information point out the onset of much less steadily fluctuating situations within the 16th century BC. This 16th century BC change horizon was sufficiently pronounced for Kern et al. [27] to posit a 3.5ka local weather occasion occurred throughout east-central and south-eastern Europe. In the course of the LBA 1 and a pair of phases the local weather seems comparatively cooler and wetter than the expansion interval of MBA tells. In the course of the 14th to 13th centuries BC rainfall decreased alongside rising temperatures however with comparatively secure hydroclimatic situations general. This pattern accelerates ca. 1250 BC, with an more and more arid local weather and rising temperatures for ca. two centuries, bringing situations near these of the expansion interval of MBA tells [21, 23]. French’s [28] geoarchaeological examine of the close by Benta Valley suggests this 13th-12th century aridity performed a task within the slowing of rivers in elements of the plain.

Hydroclimate and temperature observations are primarily derived from speleothem analyses, with the Hungarian information probably biased in direction of reflecting wintertime situations. There’s much less readability on the seasonality of change (larger summer time or winter rainfall patterns) within the Romanian information. In lots of ecosystems, winter rainfall supplies a chance for soils to recharge and stay productive in annual cycles, notably when comparatively dry summers are skilled [21, 23]. This will likely have had advantages for agricultural productiveness.

Concerning vegetation historical past of the Pannonian Plain, there are few information related to the Bronze Age, largely a consequence of poor pollen preservation. Gumnior et al.’s [18] examine of the location and hinterlands of Corneşti Iarcuri, a LBA mega-fort of the decrease Pannonian community in Western Romania, reveals numerous species and comparatively excessive tree-coverage, with arboreal pollen accounting for 38–46% of pollen from the settlement and 60–65% of pollen from close by lake sediments. Notably, anthropogenic pollen markers are lowered after 1200 BC, suggesting a shift in panorama exploitation [18].

Working at a multi-decadal scale, we will establish a common correlation between the MBA / LBA transition and altering weather conditions. This supplies a context, relatively than a trigger, for social transformations on condition that societies existed on the interface between environmental situations and social expectations of panorama use [22, 2936]. The exceptionally flat panorama of the southern Pannonian Plain with its frequent and large waterways implies that ecosystems have been finely balanced relative to hydroclimatic situations. Because of this, socially particular modes of land use would have been weak to shifts within the predictability and ranges of rainfall and their impression on the water desk.

Materials tradition and the relative chronology

The next transient overview of ceramic relative chronologies introduces related terminology (Fig 2). The MBA within the south Pannonian Plain was a fancy patchwork of fabric tradition types. On the peak of inform habitation, websites positioned south of the river Timiş primarily consumed variants of Vatin model pottery, for instance on the tells of Židovar and Feudvar and the settlement at Vatin. Alongside the Mureş river, tells akin to Pecica, Periam and Kiszombor have been dominated by the Maros model of pottery alongside a minority of the Otomani-Füzesabonystyle that was dominant farther north [19, 37, 38]. Latest work favours the time period Cornești-Crvenka model for pottery of the most recent section of the MBA, although Vatin model may also be present in literature of latest a long time [3840]. On many tells a mixture of types could be present in numerous proportions, although minority types are typically labelled as imports. There stays debate about boundaries and relevance of those teams, however related literature makes use of these conventions.

The long-standing Tumulus Tradition invasion mannequin was launched to elucidate the adoption of latest materials tradition types from the 16th century BC, prompting arguments for a causal relationship between inward migration and the autumn of the tells, an concept now out of vogue [5, 4146]. This mannequin was based mostly partially on the event of distinctive metalwork of the so-called “Koszider horizon” (ca. 1600–1450 BC) together with the “Tumulus tradition” or HGK (Hügelgräber-Kultur) pottery model of the identical common date vary [44, 47]. Latest work demonstrates that the introduction of those was asynchronous, gradual and embedded inside native craft and societal dynamics [48]. The time period Koszider is widespread within the literature however problematic, even unhelpful at present, because it has been alternatively linked to hoarding practices, metalwork types or a time period, with its relevance for understanding previous phenomena shifting in response to how the time period itself is used [49]. We favor tumulus tradition (with a small c) as a typo-chronological time period when coping with the ceramic types. Kapuran argues that the impetus to make use of tumulus tradition ceramics was launched into the realm of the decrease Pannonian community by way of two streams from the north throughout the Mureș and from the south alongside the Danube [47]. That is based mostly on a bias in distribution of pottery of this model within the north and south, and less-so the center, of Banat. That is seen for instance within the printed assemblage from Gradište Iđoš and from its cemetery at Budžak Livade within the north and the cemetery of Karaburma within the south [5053].

Within the Hungarian Danube area, Transdanubian Encrusted Ware develops throughout the MBA and the speculation stays that migration introduced this model into the Serbian Danube space, having developed into the associated encrusted Szeremle model and influenced the Dubovac-Žuto Brdo model. The Szeremle model developed alongside the north-south stretch of the Danube hall and Dubovac-Žuto Brdo model alongside the identical river after its flip to an easterly stream. There are shut similarities to each types throughout the LBA with regard to motifs, ornamental schema and vessel shapes, however the earliest phases of every model are traced to the MBA once they initially draw on associated however distinct native traditions. Sidestepping dialogue of minor variations for our functions right here throughout the LBA section we think about them as a broad stylistic household underneath the acronym SDŽB. The consumption of SDŽB was focussed on the Danube however it was consumed generally within the southern reaches of the decrease Pannonian community [47, 54, 55].

Generally, the southward unfold of the consumption of tumulus tradition and encrusted ware types sign mobility. Whereas we could solely speculate on whether or not this was individuals, issues or concepts on the transfer, it correlates with a disruptive section on the finish of the MBA. Their introduction alongside different ceramic types is related for understanding the late 17th to 16th centuries BC as a pivotal time of reorganisation throughout the southern plain [54].

Within the LBA, Belegiš I ceramics emerge as a stylistic custom ca. 1600 BC and have been associated to the Vatin and Maros traditions [5557]. The second section, Belegiš II emerged within the late 15th century and is intently associated to pre-Gava types in Hungary [38, 56, 5861]. These ceramics have been consumed all through the decrease Pannonian community, but in addition as far east because the foothills of the Transylvanian plateau and previous the Sava-Drava confluence within the west. They’re discovered much less generally south of the Danube previous to 1200 BC [62]. Notably, the co-occurrence of Belegiš I and SDŽB at TSG settlements, and the widespread use of incised and / or encrusted ornament, suggests our division between the 2, based mostly totally on cemetery assemblages, is maybe sharper than would have been considered in prehistory. When the Belegiš II pottery model emerged, many options akin to hanging garland ornament, cylindrical necks with everted rims and 4 equispaced protomes derived from the Belegiš I model. These options have been shared additionally in a modified format on later SDŽB pottery, demonstrating entanglement of ideas even when broader ornamental methods have been adhered to.

Past serving as typo-chronological markers, these traits present that the TSG communities have been rising when distinctive pottery types of Belegiš, SDŽB and tumulus cultural traditions have been consumed collectively. This demonstrated incorporation of the previous Vatin and Maros traditions, of influences from the Danube and Mureș hinterlands, in addition to of types from non-adjacent areas from farther to the north. The picture gained from earlier LBA craftwork / home wares is that communities have been permeable sufficient to accommodate influences from various networks. By the onset of the LBA 2 interval ca. 1400 BC, there was more and more widespread use of Belegiš II model, suggesting that materials tradition had turn out to be a car for cultural integration, bucking a long-standing pattern for it for use to embody distinction. Analysis within the Carpathian Basin and Balkans has typically been dominated by tradition historical past / typo-chronological frameworks. It is very important keep away from slippage between talking of ceramic teams as materials tradition classes with spatial and temporal relevance and the individuals who made the pots [63, 64]. Ceramic teams can’t considered as direct proxies for ethnic or cultural id and political boundaries, however signify expressions of alternative and data [65]. Nonetheless, ceramic traditions are linked to geographic areas and between form, ornament and performance they structured the experiences / habitus of individuals utilizing them. They have been one amongst many options of day by day life that embodied distinction between teams. It’s important as a result of societies of the Carpathian Basin throughout the MBA and LBA produced a wealthy array of ceramic traditions. In aiming to elucidate, in addition to describe, why distribution patterns change in temporal and geographic area we should account for decisions and their implications for the materiality of communities. Pots could not equal individuals, however on this space they may and did specific distinction.

The center Bronze age social and settlement background

Many EBA-MBA inform websites within the Pannonian Plain have been identified for the reason that earliest days of archaeology within the 19th century, but few have been systematically excavated and printed, notably within the east and south Pannonian Plain [37, 48, 6670]. A adequate quantity has been investigated to disclose there was no single basis horizon. The origins of Bronze Age settlements are staggered at current (some had been intermittently occupied for the reason that Neolithic) or newly based tells [66, 71, 72]. This site-type grew to become more and more widespread from the later third millennium BC to peak in the midst of the primary half of the second millennium BC with respect to website numbers and density of occupation [73]. Within the Carpathian Basin 188 MBA “correct inform websites”–outlined by Gogâltan [66] as websites with over 1m of steady occupation stratigraphy–are identified. As definitions for what constitutes a inform could also be debated, this may be seen at the least quantity.

Tells have been a characteristic widespread to most, not all, MBA communities within the Pannonian Plain. There remained variety in materials tradition and related parts of death- and lifeways in numerous elements of the plain [12, 54, 57, 74]. Whereas tells constituted a typical settlement kind, there was regional variety in how they have been built-in into settlement networks and organised internally [66, 71, 75]. Kienlin emphasises that Bronze Age inform websites signify a conceptual continuity with the Neolithic with regard to make use of of area and managing this panorama [76]. In essence, the commonality of inform societies lies of their sustained bodily and ideological attachment to position. As we talk about beneath, this frames a pointy discontinuity in LBA ideologies of settlement and panorama.

It has been argued {that a} three-tier hierarchy existed between settlements within the Pecica polity, with Pecica-Şanţul Mare serving as a main centre, different tells as secondary centres and smaller, generally flat, settlements being third within the hierarchical order. On this mannequin, main centres have been locales of craft manufacturing, restricted centralisation of surplus produce and feasting within the east Pannonian Plain [37, 77]. It’s evident that this mannequin of hierarchical relations between inform and flat settlements shouldn’t be tenable in all areas of the plain [12, 57, 71, 72, 75, 76]. A dearth of systematic excavation at flat settlements, and even the flat parts of settlements surrounding tells, creates a bias within the information out there to mannequin hierarchies and networks [66, 75]. Present proof signifies that not all MBA websites have been equal in standing, longevity, dimension or density and so a hierarchy of locations was evidently recognised previously [37].

A terminal section between ca. 1600–1500 calBC is recognized at virtually all tells and lots of flat settlements with absolute dates all through the Pannonian Plain, after which a widespread abandonment horizon has been recognized [73]. This was for a very long time thought-about to have been a regional scale collapse, although latest analysis demonstrates that this transformation was advanced, staggered over a century, and {that a} transition relatively than schism could be noticed in some areas [19, 66, 71, 76, 78]. As we argue beneath, new proof from LBA settlements signifies a lot of this alteration was proactive adaptation and innovation within the context of fixing political situations that undermined the systemic logic and energy dynamics of southern MBA regimes.

Within the northern Pannonian Plain Fischl et al. [12] detect a shift from dense and complicated settlement patterns centred round MBA tells to much less advanced, open LBA settlements, whereas within the Benta Valley, regardless of a discount of website numbers and estimated inhabitants stage, hierarchical ordering of settlements survives into the LBA [69, 79]. Within the southeast Pannonian Plain, decline could be detected between 1700 and 1550 BC, with some settlements being deserted and the density of exercise at beforehand affluent websites diminishing [77, 80]. Modifications within the 16th century weren’t sudden, however have been socially far-reaching, irreversible, spatially intensive and included nearly all central websites / main centres / core community nodes and their cemeteries. This unfolded in lower than a century–a timeframe according to anthropological fashions of collapse [36, 81, 82]. In our view, what collapsed was the political / ideological regimes, and widespread participation in these. Regardless of these elementary shifts in how individuals organised themselves in settlements and communities, options of day by day life akin to craft, rituals and food regimen reveal resilience in macrocultural traits of the overall populace. As Johnson [81] places it “peculiar residents are inclined to muddle by way of transitions and adapt to a brand new regular,” whereas these exploiting or instantly benefiting from higher-order organisational infrastructures are typically destabilised or disenfranchised.

Across the northern frontier of the realm to be occupied by the decrease Pannonian community, abandonment of central websites and cemeteries of the Pecica polity occurred between 1600 and 1500 BC [19, 48]. The tells at Mošorin-Feudvar and Belegiš (on the western TSG restrict), Židovar (southern restrict) and Foeni together with the tell-like settlements of Vatin (east and south-east restrict) and Pančevo-Najeva Ciglana and Zlatica–Omoljica east and south-west restrict) will likely be mentioned (Fig 1). It’s instantly apparent from Fig 3 that 1) these vital MBA websites are positioned on the margin of the realm to turn out to be densely occupied within the LBA and a pair of) few MBA websites have been recognized inside that zone. On present proof, the dividing line between settlements clustering across the perimeter and clustering throughout the core of the TSG space is ready at ca. 1600–1500 BC. An outline of the abandonment of the above listed websites supplies a context to the emergence of LBA websites and helps establish the character of resilience, transformation and innovation as a part of this societal reorganisation.

The Pecica polity.

The inform of Pecica (Pecica-Șanțul Mare) lies on the northern financial institution of the Mureș river. It has been investigated for the reason that 19th century and the outcomes of successive excavations establish the location as a central place in its native settlement community [66, 68, 77, 83, 84]. O’Shea [37] considers Pecica to lie on the coronary heart of a ‘Pecica polity’ spreading over an space of 4,000sq KM encompassing the center and decrease stretches of the River Mureș and its confluence with the Tisza. That is instantly north of the TSG space however there isn’t a spatial overlap between these networks of websites. This polity is alleged to include secondary centres positioned 50 and 55km away at Klárafalva Hajdova and Rábé Anke-sziget respectively, in addition to many flat settlements [77], although this mannequin is debated [85]. An extra inform on the alternative (west) financial institution of the Tisza from Rábé –Anka-sziget at Kanjiža-Ribarski trg might also have served as a secondary centre, although solely small take a look at excavations have taken place [86]. Different inform settlements happen within the hinterlands of the Mureș to the east and north of Pecica however aren’t mentioned right here as we’re focussed on these bordering the TSG [80].

The event of centrality at Pecica has been considered as a course of embroiled in battle as hegemony and autonomy have been negotiated between websites on this community. The “Fluorescent interval” at Pecica, when substantial constructing works and dense exercise have been outlined on the inform, lasted from ca. 1850 to 1680 calBC [77]. After this, most flat settlements and cemeteries within the decrease Mureș zone of the Pecica polity have been deserted and exercise at Pecica itself grew to become significantly sparser till its closing abandonment earlier than 1545 calBC. Based mostly on relative courting of pottery, Klárafalva Hajdova, Kanjiža-Ribarski trg and Rábé Ankasziget have been deserted round this time, although absolute dates from coring on the latter aren’t any later than 1600 calBC [48]. The MBA cemetery of Ostojićevo declined in use within the 18th century BC however skilled a quick upswing in exercise from 1600–1500 BC earlier than being deserted for over a century [48]. In the end, the Maros group had skilled declining inhabitants ranges together with website abandonments for the reason that 17th century, a cycle that was full by the mid-16th century in response to absolute dates from excavations [73]. These abandonments and the “terminal section” at Pecica have been modern to the swing in direction of wetter and cooler climate in palaeoclimate data within the mid-17th to mid-16th centuries BC (Table 1).

There was clear continuity of occupation within the surrounding space with new and vital centres established within the mid-second millennium BC. The function of monumental central locations continued however modified in kind. Floor finds of LBA ceramics from the close by website of Pecica in Vii counsel continuity close to to the Pecica inform. Though the dimensions of this website stays undefined, it might prolong as much as 100 ha within the LBA [87]. Inside a ca. 30km radius of Pecica the megaforts of Csanádpalota (460ha) and Sântana Cetatea Veche (130ha) have been constructed quickly after the inform was deserted [8891]. Close by, the extensively excavated unenclosed flat settlement of Șagu was a brand new basis of the 16th century BC [19, 38, 92]. Its comparatively small dimension for an LBA website (22 ha) and lack of boundary ditch point out it was most likely not a excessive standing website. The intensive proof for metalworking there signifies a shift in ideology, management and standing of metalworking and metalworkers within the MBA-LBA transition [4].

Mošorin-Feudvar.

Trying past this website community within the north, fieldwork has additionally been carried out on the western restrict of the TSG on the west financial institution of the Tisza on the Titel Plateau. The positioning of Mošorin-Feudvar was excavated by Hänsel and Medović within the late 1980’s, although publication has been partial [70, 93]. Falkenstein has carried out intensive floor survey and coring on the encompassing plateau, with outcomes printed together with some particulars from the excavations at Mošorin-Feudvar [94, 95]. The inform was established throughout the EBA in some unspecified time in the future earlier than 2000 BC, based mostly on relative chronology of excavated strata. Within the 17th century and 16th centuries BC, a notable enhance in interplay with individuals making Maros pottery is attested. Consumption of late Maros and Otomani-Füzesabony ceramics (typically tough to tell apart) is initially in a minority, however within the early 16th century they briefly turn out to be dominant, whereas the beforehand dominant Vatin model ceramics proceed as a minority part. The timing of the introduction of influences from Maros group ceramics correlates with abandonment of websites within the Pecica polity, together with Pecica itself.

There are hints of battle within the modifications in settlement patterns noticed across the Titel Plateau. Nearly all satellite tv for pc settlements have been deserted ca. 1600 BC, across the time of a quick interval of development and fortification at Mošorin-Feudvar itself [70]. This inform was occupied into the 16th century, but exceptionally few sherds of Belegiš I or tumulus tradition kinds have been recovered there regardless of this pottery being widespread in websites within the surrounding space.

The inform was deserted earlier than the tip of the 16th century BC and intensive pedestrian survey reveals that settlement thereafter unfold throughout the 8,197ha Titel plateau. This reveals a shift from intensive to intensive patterns of settlement and land-use. The pottery used modifications solely then, when SDŽB and Belegiš households are adopted. A cemetery on the plateau at Stubarlija was established and remained in use till ca. 1200 BC. The inform at Mošorin-Feudvar was reoccupied within the 12th century BC, based mostly on absolute dates from the excavation and courting of pottery types by Tasić and Falkenstein that are alternatively termed Belegiš IIb, Belegiš II-Gava or Belegiš III [56, 94].

Defining conflicts by way of pottery is a precarious affair because it dangers equating pots with individuals, however the timing of modifications in consumption patterns at Mošorin-Feudvar is vital. Maros pottery was launched throughout a interval of decline within the core space of its manufacture and at a time when the newly rising Belegiš model was excluded from the inform settlement. Following the abandonment of the central website, the dominant ceramic sorts switched and new settlements and a brand new cemetery have been established. Falkenstein et al. [70] argue for an entire change of inhabitants throughout this upheaval. An argument for modifications in hegemonic practices and elite lineages may nicely be seen in these marked modifications in pottery the communities discovered it socially applicable to make use of, with new rulers being extra receptive to immigration and / or accommodating some social conventions of neighbouring teams. Different modifications included the marginalisation of the inform as a spotlight of exercise after it had long-served as a centre of native energy. As will likely be mentioned beneath, the extensification of land-use seen on the plateau is a trademark of LBA conventions within the TSG space, even when a big enclosure is lacking on this naturally outlined area.

There’s additionally a Bronze Age inform at Belegiš – Šančine ca. 30km south on the west financial institution of the Danube, however there aren’t any printed experiences of investigations there to substantiate its exact chronology. The LBA cemetery of Belegiš Stojića Gumno lies 800 metres from this inform, demonstrating continued exercise in its speedy environs after 1600 BC [60].

Pančevo-Najeva Ciglana and Zlatica–Omoljica.

Temporary feedback could be made concerning the excavated settlements at Pančevo-Najeva Ciglana and Zlatica–Omoljica. The previous lies on the outskirts of the city of Pančevo, in direction of the southwest margin of the TSG. Stratified deposits weren’t recovered and the location can typically be dated to the MBA on the premise of Vatin pottery recovered. The positioning seems to have been small, nevertheless, in response to Ljuština [96]. Zlatica–Omoljica additionally lies on the margin of the TSG system, near the Danube. This was a bigger website with a number of phases and after the MBA section with Vatin pottery, a section with SDŽB pottery was recognized. It’s unclear if there was a break in occupation between these two ceramic horizons, however whether or not steady or as a brand new institution, this early LBA occupation of a selected location that was occupied within the MBA could be very uncommon within the surrounding space. There’s nothing to point that this settlement was of notably excessive standing. No clear abandonment date throughout the MBA has been outlined for both website [96, 97].

Foeni and Butin.

Situated simply north of the east-west flowing Timiş river on the Romanian facet of at present’s Serbia-Romania border, the Foeni website advanced consists of a tell-like settlement, a inform, and a flat settlement [98]. These have been sequentially occupied and have been all positioned alongside the identical river terrace. The tell-like settlement (Foeni-Cimitrul Ortodox) was enclosed, had Neolithic origins, and although Bronze Age layers have been closely disturbed, it seems to have been restricted to late Early- to early Center Bronze Age habitation. Sporadic finds of Belegiš I ceramics point out low-level exercise there within the LBA [98]. Established similtaneously the tell-like settlement was deserted, a small inform (Foeni-Gomila Lapului I) to the north continued in use till the tip of the MBA with ceramics of the Vatin household documented as predominant relatively than the Maros or Otomani-Füzesabony group ceramics widespread within the Pecica polity. The ultimate section of occupation documented in Gogâltan’s take a look at trenches was dated by the presence of SDŽB pottery dated to LBA 1 [99].

Following the abandonment of the inform, a brand new flat settlement (Foeni-Gomila Lapului II) was established close by which had Belegiš I and II pottery [99]. This demonstrates vital continuity throughout the MBA to LBA horizon on the Foeni advanced, but a transparent rejection of the inform as a spotlight of exercise. It’s unclear from aerial imagery if the LBA settlement conforms to the TSG kind, however a website of that attribute kind could be discovered 6km to the south at Cruceni (Cruceni-Modusi Ut). Point out ought to be made from the partly-destroyed website of Butin to the south of Foeni and east of the TSG. This can be a MBA inform, however there are few information concerning its date aside from possible finds of Vatin pottery [100].

Židovar.

Equally little is printed but for the southernmost inform investigated within the Pannonian Plain at Orešac-Židovar (S2 File). It’s positioned, much like Mošorin-Feudvar, on an remoted a part of a excessive loess terrace above the valley of the river Karaš [101]. The positioning was occupied by 2000 BC, with density of exercise growing within the following centuries on the inform and in an outer decrease settlement that was constructed presently, in addition to the creation of surrounding terraces. There’s 3.5m (out of 5.6m general) of Bronze Age stratigraphy at Židovar, of which MBA ranges are dominated by Vatin pottery kinds and are 2m deep [57, 101, 102]. Using Vatin pottery suggests some similarities within the expression of id to the group at Foeni and earlier MBA phases at Mošorin-Feudvar, whereas additionally marking this as notably totally different to Pecica and the later phases of Mošorin-Feudvar. This pertains to each native pottery manufacturing and the usage of exogenous types in group dynamics at Židovar. Following the MBA section, the following stratigraphic horizon skips a number of centuries and is characterised by black-burnished pottery of the Belegiš II-Gava custom, dated after 1200 BC [57]. This is similar hole as recognised at Mošorin-Feudvar. The chronology of the decrease settlement is unclear past a common contemporaneity, partly due to disturbance by Early Iron Age pits. Some Belegiš II-Gava ceramics have been additionally recovered. As with Mošorin-Feudvar, the ultimate MBA phases have been disturbed by pure and later exercise, however there’s presently no printed proof to substantiate re-occupation of the inform after 1500 BC and previous to 1200 BC when Belegiš II-Gava pottery was launched.

Vatin and Bugarska Humka.

Vatin (Vatin Bela Bara) is an oddity correctly documented as a tell-like settlement as a result of it’s largely flat in at present’s panorama, however with over 2 metres of stratigraphy, it conforms to Gogâltan’s definition of a inform [66]. An unique settlement plan related to Vatin pottery was reconfigured at a time when later MBA Crvenka- Cornești (1850–1600 BC) pottery was adopted. This created advanced stratigraphic relations, compounded by a rough sandy geology which made phasing of occupation horizons tough. Occasional finds of Chalcolithic pottery are identified from the location, however the earliest architectural options recognized have been constructed ca. 1900 BC. The small excavation home windows at Vatin point out it was densely occupied and served as a central website for its speedy hinterland. The outcomes of latest excavations are being ready for publication by one of many current authors (DJ) and we will state right here that the location was deserted within the final a long time of the seventeenth century calBC. After that, a cemetery of LBA date was established instantly above elements of the MBA settlement, with burial pits generally dug into the ruins of homes. The earliest burial was an inhumation with metalwork together with a sword, a miniature battle axe and a needle datable to the 15th century BC [103105]. A second LBA cemetery (Vatin-Selo) was created on the appropriate financial institution of the river about 0.5 km to the northwest. Nonetheless, no LBA settlement has been positioned close by. Finds from the cemetery reveal continued occupation of the hinterland, with vessels of each SDŽB and Belegiš I-II types recovered.

Ca. 12km to the southwest of Vatin, a small inform or tell-like settlement at Bugarska Humka was recognized in our survey. Floor finds embody later MBA (Cornești-Crvenka) ceramics, which additionally happen within the surrounding fields. The scale and abandonment section of the location are unclear, however no LBA pottery was discovered within the neighborhood.

Late Bronze age settlement–present data

The LBA settlement archaeology of the broader Carpathian Basin is much less well-researched than the MBA and so our data of LBA society is commensurately much less well-developed. A lot focus has been on typo-chronologies of ceramics and metalwork, generally derived from cemeteries and hoards, with little analysis or theorisation of the LBA social and political panorama. By way of contextualising our survey, subsequently, we rely totally on latest excavation initiatives which have focussed on higher-order, or just bigger, monumental settlements.

A key purpose that so little is understood about LBA settlements is their low visibility on the bottom–most are easy flat settlements. Certainly, these LBA settlements with seen ramparts have been the primary to draw consideration by way of excavation lately. This monumentality was a key design characteristic for a lot of LBA settlements, as testified by the intensive use of ditches for enclosures [106]. Nonetheless, when no / small ramparts accompanied them, the infilling of diches over time means they’ve very low floor visibility at present. Surviving upstanding ramparts are uncommon and are related to the bigger and most monumental websites, the acute case being Corneşti Iarcuri at ca. 1765 ha [107]. This was the most important development in-built any a part of Europe as much as that point, dwarfing the citadels of the Aegean world and their surrounding cities. Different spectacular websites, whereas smaller, have been nonetheless huge relative to earlier and modern websites in Europe, with websites akin to Sântana Cetatea Veche, Gradište-Iđoš, Sakule, Crepaja, Bašaid, Csanádpalota, Orosháza Nagytatársánc and Újkígyós all warranting the time period megasite or megafort, starting from 75 to 460 Ha of enclosed area (Fig 1) [50, 89, 108].

Latest excavations inside a few of these websites have supplied new data on LBA constructing episodes, design of area and home economies. At Cornești Iarcuri, proof for LBA home buildings and exercise extra typically could be very restricted regardless of its huge dimension. Meals was clearly produced and consumed on the website based mostly on finds of querns, archaeobotanical and zooarchaeological assemblages, however there aren’t any indications as as to if this was everlasting or occasional occupancy [109]. Equally at Csanádpalota, regardless of its huge dimension of 460 ha, the proof for everlasting occupation inside could be very restricted [108]. It ought to be careworn that their monumental dimension means a tiny fraction of those websites has been topic to excavation and that floor prospection is impacted by soil formation and cultivation exercise. At each websites, there stays a chance that the architectural traditions in a panorama devoid of stone could have resulted in poor archaeological visibility, notably in the event that they weren’t burned. The argument for poor architectural visibility is bolstered by the intensive development-led excavations at Șagu, the place lots of home and industrial refuse have been recovered in over 300 pits, however no buildings have been outlined within the open-area excavations.

On the 130ha website of Sântana, positioned north of the Mureș, exceptionally huge ramparts have been constructed which are distinctive within the space and the excavators level to similarities with Terramare ramparts in northern Italy [19]. Geophysics revealed three giant buildings of ca. 50m size on their lengthy axis and between 9 and 20 different buildings within the internal enclosure (I), demonstrating the doable presence of monumental buildings, but in addition a notably totally different use of area than at TSG websites. The outer enclosures (II and III), nevertheless, have very low density buildings (of unknown date) indicating an identical concern with sustaining enclosed open areas [89, 110]. In southern Hungary north of the Mureș river, the LBA websites of Orosháza Nagytatársánc (two enclosures ca. 105ha + 85ha, general 190ha) and Újkígyós (ca. 70ha) are very giant enclosed settlements which have many seen pale exercise areas and a number of enclosures. Though their spatial organisation is barely totally different, they incorporate a small enclosure discovered at many bigger TSG websites.

At Gradište Iđoš, excavation has focussed on the enclosure ditches, but the exercise areas mentioned beneath are indicative of home buildings clustered collectively, leaving giant elements of the enclosed area apparently unoccupied. Two habitation areas are outlined by ditches together with an embanked citadel space and these are completely enclosed by additional ditches, defining an area of as much as 200 ha. Gaydarska and Chapman argue that the absence of proof for buildings at Gradište Iđoš ought to be learn actually as proof of absence and so they correlate this with the dearth of seen buildings at Cornești Iarcuri and Csanádpalota to counsel these websites weren’t settlements [111]. They contend that the first perform of the most important enclosed websites was as a spot of meeting. Nevertheless, viewing Gradište Iđoš as considered one of 100+ settlements in Banat with comparable occupation traces outlined by pale ‘exercise areas’, and as regards to Orosháza Nagytatársánc and Újkígyós in Hungary, their idea can’t function a rule for all giant enclosed websites / megaforts of this space.

Turning to cemeteries, of these in use throughout the MBA within the broad environs of the TSG, most have been deserted by 1600 BC [41, 48]. Sadly together with the dearth of MBA settlements, there’s a dearth of identified cemeteries of MBA date within the speedy proximity of TSG websites. Nonetheless, the institution of latest cemeteries after 1600 BC is a sturdy assertion of latest demise and lifeways attribute of the LBA and we will establish many who have been established then and used till ca. 1200 BC (Fig 3). Solely a small few continued for use at a lowered stage after that point [38].

The connection of LBA settlements and cemeteries to the tumuli located inside and round them stays unclear as a result of no tumuli have been excavated and printed within the hinterlands of the TSG [112]. Regardless of the dearth of chronological dedication, if we settle for they might be prehistoric and pre-LBA, their spatial relationship with LBA settlements and cemeteries means that tumuli performed an vital ideological function in LBA social landscapes (e.g. Figs 3, 4 and S3 File). For instance, the flat cemetery of Budžak Livade beside Gradište Iđoš lies alongside the trail of a tumulus alignment, which in flip follows a paleochannel. Tumuli all through the realm generally align with water channels, with the best density related to the most important East-West flowing water programs, with vital alignments terminating close to to the megaforts of Gradište Iđoš and Sakule (Fig 3). Contemplating excavated tumuli from the broader area, it’s possible that giant diameter and tall examples date to the 4th to early 3rd millennium BC and a few of these with 10-20m diameter and low mounds (1–1.5m in top) could even be LBA in date. This chance is predicated on the identical metalwork types present in tumuli with these proportions dated to the 14th to 13th century calBC in areas south of the TSG alongside the Western Morava and tributaries of the Sava to the south and Susani-Grămurada on the fringe of the Pannonian Plain to the east of Cornești Iarcuri [58, 113116].

All dimension ranges of tumuli have been in-built shut proximity to one another, occurring each inside and instantly adjoining to many TSG websites. This defines a fancy palimpsest panorama of settlement and mortuary websites. Whether or not tumuli are all older or if some are near-contemporary to the settlements, we see co-location as stating a declare–latest, invented, partly-constructed or completely appropriated–to an ancestral panorama that had not been associated to inform communities. LBA communities might thus “borrow” legitimacy by utilizing locations of the useless. Establishing flat cemeteries equally created new ancestral relationships in time and area. These strikes allowed new narratives of panorama, continuity and legitimacy to emerge based mostly on strategic locational decisions. This was conceptually in opposition to the continual occupation of home areas that had been a defining attribute of MBA tells.

Supplies and strategies

With a purpose to higher perceive the settlement community in its entirety, we should contextualise the higher identified giant websites inside a continuum all the way down to the smallest ones [15]. With this in thoughts, we initiated the Survey Within the Decrease Tisza (SILT) undertaking in 2019 combining distant prospection and floor truthing of potential websites. This isn’t an exhaustive mapping of all LBA exercise on this panorama as our goal was to establish these settlements with particular options seen by way of distant prospection.

Beneath, we comply with the overall LBA chronology established by Gogâltan [117] as follows: LBA 1 = 1600–1400 BC, LBA 2 = 1400–1200 BC and LBA 3 = 1200-1050/1000 BC. The 16th century is problematic as a result of in lots of schema that is counted as MBA and we acknowledge that the MBA-LBA boundary is nebulous. In relative chronological phrases, Belegiš I and tumulus tradition (HGK) correspond to LBA 1, Belegiš II to LBA 2, and SDŽB pottery spans each.

The identification of archaeological websites by way of aerial prospection, pioneered by D. Grosman, started within the early 2010s and additional LBA websites of TSG kind have beforehand been recognised by way of survey [118122]. For this examine, prospection started with Google Earth historic imagery. Whereas some websites have been seen year-round, photos from February to Could have been probably the most appropriate for figuring out attribute options. An in depth affiliation between website location and water programs was noticed, with most websites set again round 20km or extra from the present course of the River Tisza, to keep away from its flood plain. Recognized settlements have been sometimes set alongside paleo-water channels or near low-lying and marshy areas. The place greater floor / loess terraces have been current, websites tended to happen on the base of the terrace. These fundamental standards refined our prospecting, enabling us to find websites with decrease floor visibility.

Subsequently, one of many authors (M. Estanqueiro) used satellite tv for pc distant sensing (Sentinel-2 information) analyses for website detection to establish slightly over 100 candidate archaeological websites with pale soil marks on each side of the Tisza [122]. By analysing the spectral signatures of identified TSG websites pale soil marks and evaluating them with their speedy environment it was doable to detect variations in reflectance, translated in numerous soil proprieties, and establish the months the place the soil marks are extra seen. As a result of band combos don’t all the time permit the direct visualization of archaeological options, a number of vegetation indices have been additionally calculated, and principal part evaluation (PCA) carried out. Focussing on candidate websites recognized by way of numerous distant prospection on the east of the river, greater than 100 TSG websites have been documented (Table 2) alongside 10’s of comparable websites recognized to the east and west of our survey space. To substantiate their chronology, we visited or used literature and museum data to substantiate the chronology of 101 out of 106 TSG websites recognized by distant prospection (Fig 3).

Floor truthing was influenced by accessibility of websites and agricultural cycles as ploughed land was sometimes required to permit for visibility of sherds and even modest rainfall made many websites inaccessible safely. Fieldwork concerned non-systematic floor prospection by strolling throughout the total extent of candidate websites and accumulating diagnostic ceramics. Visibility of finds throughout website visits was depending on how lately and in what method the soil had been processed (e.g. ploughing) in addition to how moist the soil was. At some websites visited greater than as soon as, it was noticed that visibility of fabric might change considerably. Generally, a dense focus of pottery could be round 5 sherds per sq. meter, however extra generally even in exercise areas (see beneath) this was nearer to 2–3 sherds per sq. meter on websites with good visibility. Ceramics have been collected by website solely and no spatial information was documented.

The overwhelming majority of sherds have been undiagnostic physique sherds. At some websites a whole lot of sherds have been seen and a pattern based mostly on diagnostic options was taken. At different websites, fewer than 20 have been seen and picked up from the whole settlement and the vary of diagnostics was subsequently restricted. Low visibility of sherds could relate to floor situations (ploughed vs. unploughed) or depth of deposits and so amount of finds retrieved was not interpreted as indicative of depth of historical exercise. As a consequence of visibility and restoration biases, websites attributed solely to the LBA 1 or to the LBA 2 section in Table 2 exhibit the presence of fabric from a given section however don’t point out with confidence that exercise throughout the different section was absent. At some websites, there have been inadequate diagnostic sherds thus far the assemblage past a common LBA (that’s LBA 1–2) date (Table 2, Fig 5 and S4 File).

thumbnail

Fig 5. Number of pottery from floor truthing survey.

Gradište Iđoš = 1, 6, 16; Novi Bečej = 2; Jankov Most 2 = 3, 13; Žitište = 4; Crepaja = 5; Uzdin = 7; Sefkerin = 8; Dobrica = 9, 10; Bavanište 3 = 11, 12; Jankov Most 2 = 13; Bašaid 3 = 14; Melenci 7 = 15; Kumane 2 = 17, 18; Sakule = 19, 23; Jarkovac = 20; Čenta = 21; Kačarevo = 22; Mramorak = 24; Kumane 2 = 25; Novi Bečej 2 = 26; Melenci 4 = 27; Zrenjanin 4 = 28. (Drawn by Dragan Jovanović).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288750.g005

As a part of our prospection program, absolute dates have been required to substantiate a common chronology of websites. Samples have been obtained from 1×1 metre take a look at trenches at Sakule, Bavanište and Kačarevo 2, from ongoing analysis excavations at Gradište Iđoš, Sakule and Žitište, and from developer-led works at Stari Tamiš and Turija Gradište. The 1x1m trenches have been excavated into exercise areas to establish the depth of cultural deposits and to get better materials for 14C courting from contexts related to ceramics beneath the plough-zone (Fig 6). This supplied a management on the frequency of ceramics throughout the topsoil versus these seen on the floor of the topsoil. As a result of intensive ploughing at websites, our dates don’t signify the ultimate section of exercise areas however relatively the ultimate undisturbed section of every characteristic. These dates confirmed the relative courting based mostly on ceramic finds. Samples have been taken additionally from cremation and inhumation burials related to extremely consultant ceramics from the cemetery of Budžak Livade beside Gradište Iđoš and spanning the LBA 1 and a pair of phases.

Outcomes

Significantly beneficial soil situations in Banat enabled us to make use of distant prospection to establish websites with extremely constant and recognisable options. First, the most typical aspect is a patchwork of roughly equidistant however irregularly organized sub-circular patches of pale soil measuring ca. 20-30m in diameter. These happen in clusters of ca. 10–30 patches. Second, the pale patches are generally enclosed by one to a number of ditches, generally with traces of flattened ramparts, seen in distant imagery and / or pure watercourses or soil ridges (Fig 7 and S2 File). Ditches also can serve to internally sub-divide areas, as typically seen in aerial photos.

Floor materials (mostly pottery, bone and floor stone) was targeting these attribute pale patches and discover density sharply dropped off away from them. We subsequently termed these ‘exercise areas’. Our preliminary take a look at excavations on the settlement of Sakule point out they have been the placement of disturbed home buildings, with patches of ground stage and doable rammed-earth wall bases tentatively recognized. The pale color arises from a mixing of the underlying loess subsoil, topsoil and doubtless different natural parts used to construct buildings.

Our distant prospection strategy is affected by a visibility bias. Solely websites that current specific options could be recognised utilizing this type of prospection. Some websites with feint / tough to recognise exercise areas have turn out to be identified to us following developer-led excavations–notably Banatski Dvor–or by way of focused intensive (area-specific) systematic floor prospection [123127]. These surveys have additionally demonstrated that LBA home exercise was happening all through the broader panorama and was not focussed solely inside TSG settlements. Small, distant websites akin to particular person farmsteads little doubt existed additionally, as seen within the intensive survey of the Titel Plateau [95]. Nonetheless, we might argue that the comparatively giant footprint of TSG websites relative to different identified websites defines them as central locations inside their hinterlands and their dense distribution means that the whole panorama was very intently built-in and managed by their builders.

Characterizing the tisza website group

The 100+ TSG websites recognized so far in Serbia align broadly on a north-south axis on the east facet of the Tisza-Danube north-south hall. Websites with equivalent design happen instantly to the east between the Bega and Timiş rivers in Romania (Fig 3). They’re positioned in equally low-lying elements of the panorama, and whilee not visited on the bottom as a part of this undertaking, their chronology has been confirmed by Dorogostaisky and colleagues [119, 120]. A handful of websites of this manner have been recognized so far on the west facet of the Tisza in Serbia, in Bačka county, together with the settlement at Turija which had options dated to LBA 2 based mostly on ceramics and absolute dates (Fig 1).

On the premise of aerial imagery, TSG websites vary in dimension from ca. 6 ha to as a lot as 200 ha. Based mostly on the interquartile vary from all identified TSG websites, the seen footprint of exercise derived from distant prospection at most websites is within the vary of 10–50 ha (Fig 8). Within the case of unenclosed websites on the decrease finish of this spectrum dimension is calculated in response to the minimal seen exercise zone (extent coated by exercise areas) and excludes the equal ‘empty’ area that lies between exercise areas and boundary ditches at enclosed websites. The smallest outlined website had solely 2 (probably 3) exercise areas at Kumane 3 and the most important is Gradište Iđoš at practically 200 ha which has a number of enclosures and two distinct modern enclosures surrounding exercise areas.

thumbnail

Fig 8. Measurement and visual options of TSG and TSG-like websites in Banat and east Backa.

All definitions seek advice from options seen in aerial imagery. Single-enclosure websites have one full or partially seen ditch outdoors of exercise areas. A number of-enclosure websites have two or extra full or partially seen ditches. Websites with no seen enclosures refers to detection utilizing distant prospection visibility solely and has not been floor truthed. (Map by Marta Estanqueiro and Caroline Bruyere; basemap hillshade derived from ALOS DSM AW3D30, reprinted from https://www.eorcJaxaJp/ALOS/en/dataset/aw3d30/aw3d30_e.htm underneath a CC BY license, with permission from JAXA -Japan Aerospace Exploration Company, unique copyright 2023).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288750.g008

Enclosed settlements are mostly sub-circular to sub-oval in plan (Fig 9), although they’re often sub-rectangular with a number of straight boundaries (e.g. Dobrica and Bavanište). Ditches are generally V-shaped in profile, in some instances shifting to U-shaped close to to entrances, and are often between 2 and three metres deep (from the trendy area floor) and three to six metres huge on the prime. Some enclosures could be irregular in form when utilising panorama options, together with watercourses and slopes (e.g. Melenci, Torda 2, Mramorak). Websites also can embody a mixture of those panorama options (e.g. Gradište Iđoš, Jankov Most, Novo Miloševo). Round 50% of websites, ordinary smaller ones, haven’t any enclosure seen in aerial photos, 30% of websites have one enclosure, whereas bigger and extra advanced websites can have as much as 4 concentric or sequentially accessed enclosures, as seen at Crepaja, Sakule, Bašaid, Mokrin and Gradište Iđoš for instance (Figs 3 and 10). An estimated 30–40% of the megafort at Crepaja has been eroded within the northeast by way of the migration of a now-extinct minor watercourse. XXXX MOVE FIGURE REF HERE XXXXXXXXXXXXXX? Fig 9: Define of a choice of TSG websites displaying vary of organisational options together with ditches and pure watercourses. (Drawn by Caroline Bruyere)

thumbnail

Fig 10.

1) 5km radius vary round TSG websites. 2) Distance-based cumulative distribution capabilities. For F, G and Okay capabilities—black traces: noticed values; crimson traces: theoretical values; grey values vary: Monte Carlo envelopes contemplating 99 simulations. For J perform—blue line: theoretical values; black line: Kaplan-Meyer estimate; crimson line: Hanisch estimate; inexperienced line: reduced-sample estimate. (Map and graphs by Marta Estanqueiro; basemap hillshade derived from ALOS DSM AW3D30, reprinted from https://www.eorcJaxaJp/ALOS/en/dataset/aw3d30/aw3d30_e.htm underneath a CC BY license, with permission from JAXA -Japan Aerospace Exploration Company, unique copyright 2023. Graphs plotted utilizing R 4.2.0).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288750.g010

A practical hierarchy could be recognised in website design, whereby the bigger websites are invariably extra advanced than smaller ones and so they invariably have spatially extra intensive and intensive floor traces of exercise (aside, maybe, from Bašaid). Inner divisions are outlined by enclosures seen both in aerial imagery or by way of geophysical survey [50]. The number of website areas, from light slopes to remoted islands on the sides of wetlands, might also counsel that aside from dimension and complexity, totally different websites had totally different roles or particular functions inside this community.

Exercise areas generally lie 20–40 metres aside and are hardly ever extra densely spaced or overlap. They happen from the geometric centre of a website in a cluster and their distribution stops a minimum of 40, and as much as 100, metres away from enclosing ditches (when current). This means {that a} particular zone with no exercise areas was often retained round habitation loci however throughout the boundaries of a settlement, creating deliberately “empty” areas. Fernández-Götz has lately mentioned the relevance of such divisions and empty areas for understanding complexity at non-urban settlements [128, 129]. The density of exercise areas is comparatively constant throughout websites and so the quantity often, however not as a rule, correlates with the dimensions of the enclosed space if current. This pattern could be damaged when websites are unfold alongside a watercourse relatively than clustering round a spot beside it, as seen on the Jankov Most, Novo Miloševo or the Melenci clusters of websites. Intensive systematic surveys of a pattern of settlements carried out by C. Bruyere and geophysical survey information by J. Pendić and G. Topić will shed additional mild on spatial format and density of exercise inside some enclosures in publications in preparation.

All websites are set inside lively agricultural lands at present which are topic to ploughing, thereby damaging them yearly and impacting on preservation and visibility of options. Regardless of this, at some websites exercise areas have been barely raised above the encompassing floor indicating that many, and maybe all, had as soon as been optimistic options standing pleased with the encompassing floor stage. Check excavations at Sakule verify that exercise areas have been a locus for sequential phases of exercise, comparable in idea however totally different in execution to intergenerational modes of inform occupation.

TSG websites are densely spaced within the panorama, and the overwhelming majority lie inside 5km of a minimum of one different identified website (Fig 10.1). Their shut proximity, and the truth that the catchment areas (5km radius) overlaps most often, means that the communities that lived there have been intently associated, likely by way of kinship however definitely politically. This clustering created a really dense societal community that managed not solely the encompassing territory on the native scale however this whole panorama on the bigger regional scale, together with sources and communication routes. This in flip demonstrates the presence of a fancy political system that built-in, managed and served the wants of multi-local communities dwelling inside and round hierarchically, and probably functionally, differentiated settlements.

At a visible stage, Fig 10.1 means that, much like the distribution of exercise areas inside a settlement, the distribution of settlements within the panorama was not random. With a purpose to consider if this was systematic clustering, a number of spatial capabilities have been estimated and plotted. From a statistical perspective, a totally random spatial sample could be described by a homogeneous Poisson course of with depth λ, so we computed a number of distance-based cumulative distribution capabilities to discover the spatial distribution of settlements and their departure from this speculation.

For this evaluation, G (nearest neighbour perform), F (empty area perform), J and Ripley’s Okay (detection of spatial patterns at a number of distances) capabilities have been chosen (Fig 10.2). The primary three are based mostly on nearest neighbour distances, whereas the Okay perform is predicated on distances between all pairs of factors (settlements). Level-wise Monte Carlo envelopes have been additionally computed. As we will observe in Fig 10.2, the empirical traces for settlement distribution signifies a pattern in direction of an aggregated/clustered sample. The F perform assumes that if the settlements are randomly spaced, so is the empty area between them. Subsequently, if a clustered sample is current, the empirical line could be beneath the theoretical one, as seen in Fig 10.2A. The other could be stated of the G perform, the place an empirical line above the theoretical one signifies clustering (Fig 10.2B). The J perform is a mixture of the earlier two, and values of J(r) < 1 would counsel clustering (Fig 10.2C).

With a purpose to assess the spatial sample at totally different scales, Ripley’s Okay perform was additionally used. This will help detect extra advanced patterns at totally different distances, not solely at nearest-neighbour scale. On this case, the Fig 10.2D suggests a clustering pattern at a number of scales. For our information we noticed that till roughly 3km the empirical traces adopted the theoretical ones, after that, there are indications of clustering. We are able to additionally see that almost all settlements have a nearest neighbour inside a 6km (approximate) distance. This tells us that website distribution was unlikely to be random and that shut spacing / proximity was a perform of a social technique greater than the unplanned emergence of settlements inside one another’s hinterlands. A component of horizontal motion of communities is believable throughout the length of our fairly broad chronological blocks of 100–200 years, although this is able to not clarify the relative uniformity of the clustering throughout this social panorama.

The hole between a northern and southern cluster of websites within the land between the Bega and Timiş rivers seems to be an historical phenomenon. Whether or not that was socially and / or topographically dictated is unclear, however the clustering of tumuli alongside the southern financial institution of the Timiş suggests this line was significant in prehistory (Fig 3). Following the chain of TSG-type websites between the Bega and Zlatica rivers to the east in Romania, the easternmost websites are located within the speedy neighborhood of the megafort of Cornești Iarcuri. The settlements of Carani, Biled and probably Satchinez Râtul Popii are of TSG kind and lie 8, 24 and 19 km respectively to the west of Cornești Iarcuri. Regardless of the distinctiveness of this latter website, its location on the finish of this chain of websites with comparable designs signifies a social relationship.

Local weather change and the brand new home landscapes of the Tisza Web site Group

Nicodemus and O’Shea [77] noticed that MBA tells across the Mureș and Tisza rivers generally focused panorama options that have been raised, and Ljuština [57, 101] argues the identical for Židovar, thereby occupying pure islands inside a marshy and moist hinterland. This created spatial discontinuity by land, emphasising the significance of riverine transport. We would assume–on the premise of settlement distribution alone–that sure areas of the panorama within the MBA have been undesirable because of seasonally or perpetually marshy situations. For instance, this avoidance could have arisen from (perceived) poor suitability for his or her farming conventions or weaker connections to main rivers, which have been vital parts in MBA lifeways and communication networks.

Locational decisions, together with use of panorama options, modified considerably within the LBA as areas with beforehand low-density occupation grew to become very high-density settled landscapes. Many TSG websites integrated water channels working by way of them. In instances the place water channels didn’t go by way of websites, they generally ran instantly adjoining (Table 2). Significantly within the southern cluster, the place a terrace is current with flat areas above and beneath, websites are generally positioned on the base of the slope separating the 2 ranges, for instance at Bavanište, Dobrica, Pančevo, Pančevo 2, Dolovo, Mramorak, and Mramorak 2. When a extra gradual slope is current, some websites have parts on the base and alongside the slope, for instance Kačarevo 2 (Fig 7) and Sakule. At main websites akin to Crepaja and Sakule, in addition to smaller websites, considerably greater floor on sandy terraces lies inside ca. 5km to the east, however these have been evidently rejected as settlement loci, with few exceptions e.g. Bavanište 2. The elevation variance between the bottom and prime of terraces near websites generally exceeds 8 metres top differential. The attribute ditches that encompass websites could have been supposed to assist drainage, though this was unlikely to be their main perform in mild of water channels passing by way of some websites and others ditch circuits being constructed on sloping floor (Fig 11).

The topographic location of most websites is both inside or beside among the lowest factors within the panorama and this panorama is in flip one of many lowest mendacity and flat expanses of the Pannonian Plain, which is the bottom mendacity a part of the Carpathian Basin (S2 File). Distant imagery reveals myriad palaeo-channels alongside pure and synthetic waterways lively at present. Whereas geomorphological investigation into which waterways have been lively within the Bronze Age has not been undertaken, the placement of prehistoric tumuli alongside smaller channels signifies many have been flowing within the Bronze Age. Historic maps and data for the realm exhibit that a lot of the province of Banat was topic to flooding and standing our bodies of water previous to large-scale drainage works within the 19th century AD and subsequent upgrades [130, 131]. The levees on the River Tisza have been constructed to a top of 5 metres to stop flooding and lateral motion of the now culverted water course [132]. Previous to this, over 35–50% of the Serbian province of Vojvodina, overlaying a lot of the southern Pannonian Plain, was underneath water, marshland or common menace of flooding, whereas at present 92% is underneath cultivation [130, 133]. Even so, flooding stays an everyday seasonal menace within the south Pannonian Plain, notably in low mendacity areas together with former marshes, cut-off channels and oxbow lakes of previous river programs. The chance of flooding is, and will need to have been in prehistory, unpredictable with some years being significantly tougher to navigate than others. The event of soils within the Banat area helps excessive groundwater ranges [134]. Retention of floor water because of a excessive water desk after a wet interval was an additional potential danger for the inhabitants of the TSG websites, maybe larger than flooding of main close by rivers. Historic data additionally present a opposite sample whereby a considerable discount in rainfall can have substantial short-term impacts on soil hydration and productiveness as a result of interconnected nature of waterways and their relevance to the water desk throughout a large space [133]. Most TSG websites are positioned on deposits fashioned within the Late Pleistocene, indicating alluvial deposition from flooding was not a significant factor shaping Holocene topography at these areas [135]. Alluvial deposits of Holocene age have been documented close to to the websites alongside present-day river programs.

See Also

With the low-lying topography and relationship to a community of water channels and doable seasonal or perennial open our bodies of water in thoughts, the builders of those websites established a wetland-oriented settlement technique which took benefit of the actual environmental situations this provided. De Marinis [136] and Dalla Longa [137, 138] each observe for the modern Po Valley a option to occupy low-lying areas related to water programs (Terramare websites) or to construct homes on stilts inside areas of standing water (Palfitte websites). This displays what Dalla Longa calls [138] “a transparent intention to arrange settlements alongside foremost river programs or on their banks … websites are positioned close to or inside moist basins, following the “wetland-oriented” settlement technique well-known in literature”. This similarity in settlement technique could also be an additional reflection of systematic cultural, ideological and doubtless financial exchanges linking these two exceptionally giant and flat plains [139141]. Moreover, this swap from the avoidance of low-lying areas within the MBA to embracing them within the LBA could be learn as modifications to worldviews and cosmologies, probably together with the mixing of beforehand liminal areas as inhabited areas. The extremely comparable locational decisions for nearly all TSG websites, nevertheless, additionally reveals a dearth of danger spreading, notably in mild of their obvious co-dependence.

Within the case of the TSG, these settlement methods counsel that communities exploited a finely balanced ecosystem that was enabled by the prevailing weather conditions between 1500 and 1200 BC. Although requiring systematic environmental analysis, paleoclimate markers for elevated rainfall point out that areas that had been marginal marshy lands might have turn out to be extra predictable our bodies of water, thereby turning into a useful resource relatively than a liminal or hazardous area. This speculation might also be supported by the relative stability of hydroclimate markers of the LBA relative to the MBA, which point out situations that might have lowered the dangers related to settling in shut proximity to water programs and wetlands. As a cautionary be aware, it ought to be emphasised that the secure isotope information from the cited speleothem data primarily pertains to wintertime rainfall ranges and we lack proxies particular to summertime rainfall or temperature ranges [21, 142]. If greater water ranges have been sustained yearly this is able to guarantee hydration of soil throughout the comparatively sizzling summer time months, a phenomenon recognized in different research [35]. Future analyses of chironomid head capsules from wetlands, for instance, could present insights into summertime situations within the Center and Late Bronze Age to additional discover this [143145]. We argue that the prevailing local weather within the 16th century BC inspired choices to interact in novel land use regimes. Emergent social methods no-doubt balanced myriad societal components, in order that local weather and surroundings ought to be learn as enablers working at a multi-decadal scale that facilitated, however didn’t decide, adaptive human decisions [30, 146, 147].

There are inadequate environmental information to mannequin the situations within the TSG panorama presently, however the settlement location decisions themselves inform us two issues concerning the environmental situations. First, they have been secure sufficient to permit websites to be positioned at low-lying elevations (relative to water programs) with out substantial danger of flooding, indicating moderately predictable situations. Second, the connection of individuals to their surroundings was totally different to the Center Bronze Age, throughout which period these similar topographic areas have been actively averted.

Within the extremely comparable surroundings of the Po Valley, it has been noticed that the cooler (not chilly) however humid situations of 1500–1200 BC created an environmental area of interest by which specific types of society developed. The practices and ideologies of panorama use have been tailor-made to supporting particular wants of communities inside a selected hydroclimate and panorama hydrology area of interest. Within the Po Valley, local weather situations with predictable winter rainfall have been paired with a relatively excessive water desk within the LBA (Latest Bronze Age) relative to the MBA and Closing Bronze Age [148]. Trying from the start of the TSG phenomenon, pioneering teams will need to have demonstrated an attractiveness to the brand new lifeway on this environmental area of interest that grew to become enticing to others over time, resulting in this unprecedented density of settlements.

There are convincing grounds to argue that local weather change performed a task in how change from MBA to LBA social programs unfolded and once more throughout the time of the decline and abandonment of TSG websites from the 13th to 12th centuries BC. The decline of MBA communities was protracted and socially pushed, however the altering weather conditions have been arguably much less beneficial to their modes of utilizing the panorama. This was not a catastrophic change and certainly it might even exemplify resilience and flexibility, whereby societal scale change was wanted to efficiently regulate to a brand new regular [34, 149]. The MBA system had long-since entered a disaster state by the 16th century BC and so relatively than narrowing choices, local weather change seems to have broadened them offering different pathways to prosperity. These have been readily exploited however appeared to correlate with a elementary reorganisation of settlement and society. LBA settlement areas led to infilling and linking up of areas between the distinct tell-networks (or maybe polities) characterised by means of Maros pottery within the north and northwest and Vatin pottery within the south and east. There was evidently adequate agricultural land positioned round LBA settlements to maintain this very dense community of communities.

A second issue influencing website location seems to have been the will for colocation with pre-existing mortuary landscapes, tumuli particularly (Fig 4).This will likely have enabled LBA communities to distinguish their ideologies from these of MBA entities and create a impartial linchpin to assist integration of a heterogenous inhabitants base. An affiliation between tumuli and watercourses can be evident, for instance within the hinterland of Glogonj, Mramorak, Novo Miloševo 4, Idvor, Melenci 2 and Mokrin. This means a three-point relationship for settlement alternative in lots of instances, requiring watercourses and tumuli. Concentrations of tumuli alongside water programs served a twin goal as navigation factors marking river-land cross-roads and as boundary markers signalling management over rights to disembark boats or to cross between politically differentiated areas.

Relative chronology

The chronology of the pottery we collected throughout website visits confirmed these exhibiting all TSG options have been all LBA 1–2 in date. With only a few exceptions, people who had clustered exercise areas (with no ditches) have been additionally LBA 1–2 in date. It’s unlikely that every one TSG websites have been occupied on the similar time, and there will need to have been a component of horizontal motion of communities constructing websites. Nevertheless, if this occurred inside a brief area of time–even a long time–the decision of neither absolutely the nor relative chronologies is exact sufficient to doc this. The common spacing noticed between ‘exercise areas’ throughout the confines of every website suggests that every one, or most, home areas have been occupied concurrently or inside dwelling reminiscence.

Our courting of websites depends on diagnostic floor finds (Fig 5, Table 2 and S4 File). Belegiš I and II pottery are discovered all through the TSG space. As famous by Szentmiklosi [55] and Falkenstein [94], SDŽB pottery happens within the areas surrounding the TSG within the south, and our survey demonstrates it was consumed fairly generally throughout the southern cluster of websites. Distribution of ceramics of this broad household of encrusted pottery could be mapped now in an space extending from the Danube to south of the Bega river. It’s current, however much less frequent, within the northern cluster of TSG websites and is exceptionally uncommon within the northernmost TSG websites.

Contemplating our survey finds, there’s a larger frequency of websites which have solely Belegiš I / SDŽB pottery together with comparatively fewer or no sherds of Belegiš II within the southern website cluster (Table 2). It’s emphasised that this is usually a bias of the restoration of diagnostic sherds, as solely a handful of diagnostics have been recovered from websites that solely had Belegiš I pottery. Nonetheless, the distinction in assemblages between websites north and south of the Bega seems to be an actual phenomenon. This may be defined in two methods. The primary is that the making of Belegiš II pottery and displacement of Belegiš I occurred progressively throughout the 14th century BC, with the stylistic pattern spreading from the north whereas SDŽB was nonetheless being made within the southern cluster, thereby blurring or offsetting the LBA 1–2 ceramic transition extra there than it does within the northern cluster. The opposite chance is {that a} greater proportion of websites within the south have been deserted earlier than LBA 2.

Pottery signifies that the earliest TSG websites in each clusters have been occupied early in LBA 1 and that there was a rise in exercise, and probably website development, initially of LBA 2. Based mostly on each relative and absolute chronologies, all TSG websites seem to have been deserted within the a long time round 1200 BC. Of those, solely the most important websites at Gradište Iđoš, Sakule and probably Bašaid have indicators of reoccupation in small areas throughout the 11th to 10th centuries BC. The positioning of Jaša Tomić is an exception as this displays TSG options however was (most likely) a brand new basis of 12th to 10th centuries BC based mostly on pottery recovered.

A standard characteristic at TSG websites was reoccupation in both the Sarmatian (closing centuries BC) and / or Medieval intervals (broadly 1100–1400 AD). The Sarmatian and Kumani (11th to 13th centuries AD) teams are identified to have extensively practiced cell pastoralism [150, 151]. Re-use of prehistoric tumuli and development of latest ones on this space is a phenomenon of the 11th-13th centuries AD, probably associated to the documented arrival of non-Christian Kumani teams from the Steppes [50]. Different intervals have been very hardly ever represented at TSG settlements–notably the Neolithic–probably indicating associated ideas of panorama and land use occurred solely at particular factors within the historical past of the area.

Absolute chronology

Defining an absolute chronology for the TSG websites is tough given the variety of websites, their complexity, and their huge dimension. That is compounded by the dearth of scientific excavation. Absolute dates from well-stratified contexts at Gradište Iđoš and the close by cemetery of Budžak Livade present a common framework for the occupation historical past of 1 such group. Ceramics from graves with absolute dates embody vessels of Belegiš I and II and of tumulus tradition kinds, typical to the LBA assemblages of the northern TSG space. This LBA 1 and a pair of chronology is opposite to Daróczi et al.’s [152] latest unsubstantiated re-attribution of tumulus tradition ceramics from this cemetery to the MBA. The cemetery was established by 1600 calBC and it continued in use into the 13th century calBC (Fig 12 and S1 Table). The earliest occupation so far excavated on the settlement is 15th century calBC and there aren’t any dates later than the a long time round 1200 calBC, till a restricted 10th-9th century calBC reoccupation (Fig 13). In his regional survey of absolute dates, Sava defines a 16th century calBC date for the primary websites utilizing Belegiš pottery, with elevated numbers within the 15th century calBC and a speedy drop off of websites within the 13th to 12th centuries calBC [38]. This drop off in website numbers after 1200 BC can be steered in survey and a few excavation information for close by elements of southern Hungary [41, 108, 153]. Absolute courting at different websites within the TSG community, whereas the product of small home windows of excavation, reveal a complementary image. Particulars of pattern kind, context and uncalibrated date are supplied in S1 Table. All essential permits have been obtained for excavation and sampling from the Ministry of Tradition and Info of the Republic of Serbia, complying with related laws for archaeological analysis (Allow numbers: 631-02-154/2021-02, date 08.11.2021.; 631-02-94/2019-02, date 28.10.2019.; 631-02-146/2022-02 date 27.10.2022).

thumbnail

Fig 12. Pottery from dated contexts at Budžak Livade.

Grave 2: 3, 6; Grave 9: 4, 16; Grave 12: 1; Grave 22: 10, 15; Grave 23; 18; Grave 24: 2, 5; Grave 26: 12; Grave 29: 17; Grave 31: 8,9; Grave 32: 14; Grave 33: 13, Grave 36: 7; Grave 37: 11 (Drawn by Dragan Jovanović).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288750.g012

On the settlement of Sakule, take a look at excavations have been focussed on exercise areas. These returned dates overlaying the total length of the usage of Budžak Livade and Gradište Iđoš (Fig 14). The positioning seems to have been first occupied on the MBA to LBA transition and dated contexts cowl most centuries till ca. 1200 calBC. After that, the location seems to have been deserted till the reoccupation of a small space from ca. 1000 to 800 calBC. An identical hiatus is noticed at Cornești Iarcuri [16]. Dates from an exercise space within the TSG website of Stari Tamiš reveal occupation on the flip of the 16th to fifteenth century calBC and the settlement of Bavanište was occupied since a minimum of the 15th century calBC. The inhumation burial from Mali Akač has an unsure particular context, however might be from beside a tumulus in shut proximity to Novo Miloševo 4 settlement and this skeleton is dated to the 14th century calBC.

absolute dates from the broader LBA settled panorama of the south Pannonian Plain, the elevated depth of exercise from ca. 1400 calBC seen in dates from Gradište Iđoš is mirrored within the chronology of different well-dated enclosed websites at Sântana Cetatea Veche, Corneşti Iarcuri, Csanádpalota and Turija Gradište in addition to smaller unenclosed websites in Romania [38, 154]. There seems to be proof for burning / and or infilling of ditches at a number of excavated websites within the earlier 13th century calBC. Exercise continues in any respect different well-dated websites within the 13th century and at some probably into the early 12th century calBC. On the website of Iđoš 2, 14C information present it was occupied into the 12th century calBC [155].

Absolute and relative dates counsel that TSG websites and cemeteries–and certainly many of the decrease Pannonian community–have been deserted en masse round 1200 BC. It’s noteworthy that this was exactly the time of the contraction of settlement on the Titel plateau and reoccupation of the inform at Mošorin-Feudvar. An identical sample, based mostly on surviving strata, might be detected at Židovar, which was resettled. No re-occupation horizon is noticed at tells within the space of the Maros group within the 12th century BC. These modifications point out that data of inform websites was sustained in societies throughout LBA 1–2 however they have been marginalised as loci for settlement till one other main societal shift occurred after 1200 BC by way of which loci for LBA settlements have been rejected.

Dialogue

Trying to the development of social landscapes, relatively than being an unnavigated drift away from one system to a different, the introduction of LBA lifeways have been an lively rejection of MBA regimes. That is evident in 1) materials tradition, 2) mortuary rites, 3) cemetery location, 4) settlement design, 5) settlement inter-relations, 6) the panorama foci of exercise, 7) congregation areas and catchments.

In flip, once we think about macroculture because the long-term accrual of culturally particular habits inside a given place, then the shedding of a lot of this within the LBA of the southeast Pannonian Plain should relate to 1) substantial inward migration bringing new concepts, 2) lively rejection of previous concepts by the identical inhabitants, 3) a crisis-driven adaptation or 4) a mixture of those. Most of the constructing blocks of LBA society have been derived from MBA norms and practices, for instance pottery craft, however how they have been configured and embedded within the panorama gave a considerably totally different form to those communities and their lifeways.

Kienlin [76] lately argued that the EBA-MBA tells signify a “long-term stability of a standard lifestyle relatively than Bronze Age communities basically [being] totally different from every part that had come earlier than.” This emphasises simply how totally different in long-term perspective the LBA settlement community was. Their length of a number of centuries suggests any notion of “experimentation” is implausible and they also signify an alternate means to take advantage of sources of this similar panorama. Kienlin additional defines this long-term heritage as notably native relatively than reflecting Mediterranean influences, as argued for by others [9, 156]. This in flip contrasts with the LBA when it is extremely clear that the decrease Pannonian community hyperlinks into long-distance networks that embody Mediterranean societies. That is seen in novel mortuary practices together with metalwork and ceramics types that hyperlink the area to the Adriatic ambit, notably the Terramare teams of the Po Valley [139, 140, 157, 158]. Carpathian metalwork types turn out to be influential all through Greece alongside Italian ones in a wider stylistic community alongside parts of the Belegiš ceramic custom within the north of Greece [62, 159168]. Although this enhance in frequency is ready in a context of collapsing long-distance networks, they signify the enlargement throughout the 12th century BC disaster of pre-existing hyperlinks. Few lead-isotopic information exist from MBA contexts within the Pannonian Plain, however there seems to be a shift in steel trade networks, whereby specific networks are expanded (southeast Alps) and new ones are created within the LBA–and notably Cypriot copper is attested for the primary time [141, 169171].

The character and design of settlements was additionally totally different, even when a want to monumentalise central locations was retained. Monumentality speaks of a group’s want to aggrandise their place by way of show of vitality and sources invested in creating areas. Within the case of tells, monumentality emerged by way of a succession of generations occupying the identical area, in order that legitimacy and energy emerged from this materialised intergenerational heritage. Websites of the decrease Pannonian community took a really totally different strategy by constructing huge and enclosed settlements in beforehand unoccupied loci, generally integrating tumuli that aligned them with mortuary (greater than lived) ancestral landscapes. Monumentality was not co-constructed with ancestors however by harnessing a big labour pressure to create (short-term) and preserve (long-term) enclosure ditches and ramparts. This enabled the emergence of latest social relations inside a group, together with hierarchies and different standing / exercise categorisations. Talking of Bronze Age Crete, however related right here, Driessen and Letesson doc a trajectory of complexity arising from shifts by way of which “unique coresidential company teams have been progressively changed by proximate company teams that finally have been supplanted by dispersed company teams” [172]. These latter are related to the decrease Pannonian community as energy brokers grew to become extra distributed all through settlement networks.

Acts of constructing forts additionally had capability for relationship constructing between communities as labour grew to become a useful resource required to maintain a settlement, thereby making it a useful resource that might be exchanged or in any other case shared [173175]. Moreover, constructed defensible websites have been hardly ever static bodily or socially–their state of being was political as a result of it associated them to neighbouring and distant communities by way of acts of constructing and upkeep [15]. There are good grounds to think about the dense and interlocking community of TSG websites as creating native to regionally related “powerscapes”. Their creation was a metamorphosis of every native panorama by actively enclosing areas, however collectively these myriad, modern native acts got here collectively to characterise the TSG as a coordinated, regional phenomenon. These websites created venues the place acts of development, the following monument, its panorama setting and actions carried out inside got here collectively to convey the importance of those locations and those that constructed them [176]. Translating that right into a extra refined mannequin of political geographies at this whole-landscape scale shouldn’t be but doable and, as Driessen argues, requires a clearer sense of “at what scale(s) energy was applied and to what extent energy co-varied with scale… progressively, incrementally or erratically?” [177].

The dense spacing of TSG communities went additional than enclosing inside areas as a result of in addition they shared lands between websites, forming a large defensible chain of websites, making a press release at a total-landscape scale. Whereas this was related at an ideological stage, this declare was additionally supported by way of pressure of arms [178]. The significance of getting ready for and enacting violent battle is clear by way of the main improvements in, and large portions of, weaponry that have been developed hand-in-hand with the development of latest defensible central locations all through TSG and wider decrease Pannonian community. Developments included the invention of steel helmets, shields and armour together with new types of sword, spear and battle axes and the introduction of chariots [179182]. As a bundle of settlement and materials tradition developments, this may occasionally replicate the awakening of a “territorial consciousness” by which the enclosed areas and lands mendacity between them grew to become open to possession as territorial entities bounded by geographical options, on this case main rivers [183185].

Trying to inside organisation of settlements, from middle-sized TSG websites of 10’s of hectares as much as Cornești Iarcuri, LBA websites retained substantial open areas inside their boundaries. There was a bodily distinction between areas with intense home exercise and different enclosed areas that have been saved open. Enclosure ditches outlined inside and out of doors areas within the panorama, however in addition they created gateways and divisions inside websites creating social topographies by manipulating motion of individuals into and thru the advanced [128, 186, 187]. Social topographies seek advice from how hierarchies are enacted and interpreted by way of bodily area–controlling entry was conceptual, not enforced, and was grounded in applicable behaviour particularly areas. Spatial divisions could encourage public recognition and self-concept to be fashioned by way of seemingly benign cultural processes (e.g. defensibility), however variations have been bolstered in apply by way of managing venues for social encounters [188]. In bigger websites, areas have been typically hierarchically ordered from outer rings to innermost zones. The varied areas created and entry to them will need to have associated to rights, standing or actions to be carried out; that’s, not all areas have been created to be equal. On this method, standing inequalities got here to be distributed not solely vertically, as in a hierarchy, but in addition laterally all through the social panorama.

Moore and Fernández-Götz favour a multifunctional function to the sorts of open areas inside enclosures that have been an integral characteristic of TSG settlements, ranging in goal from specialist cropping to locations for momentary meeting of individuals or animals [128]. Gaydarska and Chapman [111] favour a devoted congregation function for the most important enclosed websites. Using open areas for gathering needn’t be an unique perform of such websites and so Gaydarska and Chapman’s argument for having recognised locations for congregation is vital. Such multifunctional open areas might serve for gatherings that have been scalable from an intimately native website cluster utilizing smaller enclosures to the regional-scale of representatives of many or all communities within the largest ones.

Survey proof for Bronze Age exercise within the panorama round these websites reminds us that they’re focal factors, not the one loci of exercise. It’s absolutely doable that we’re taking a look at a semi-sedentary society by which mobility alongside this chain of websites by among the inhabitants was a norm, maybe a part of animal herding methods. The proportion of recreation animals (>10%) in LBA faunal assemblages additional hints at this shut articulation between settlements and fewer intensively managed elements of the panorama [22]. Given the flat panorama and its susceptibility to flooding, the flexibility to pay attention herds inside enclosures could have been a type of danger administration with group members having the ability to shift between websites domestically or to bigger ones in occasions of acute hassle. Motivation to focus individuals in numerous enclosures might equally come up from episodes of violent battle.

Cornești Iarcuri stays a website of extraordinary dimension on this panorama, although its hierarchy of areas mirrors that of the smaller centres in its hinterland. The paradox of this website lies within the dearth of proof for occupation inside and the huge labour sources to keep up it–these are wholly incompatible on present proof [111]. There’s a sturdy case to be made that it was a communal centre for a lot of communities dwelling throughout the decrease Pannonian community, together with these of the TSG. Certainly, the identical pottery and metalwork types have been consumed and mortuary practices utilized in and round all of those settlements, indicating extremely comparable modes of social replica. In Gaydarska and Chapman’s mannequin, the TSG settlements would supply a justifiable “congregation catchment” who might maintain a spot on the dimensions of Cornești Iarcuri. On this method energy was manifested by way of, relatively than wielded from, this megasite throughout gatherings. In Graeber and Wengrow’s view, individuals could have adopted “kings whose courts and kingdoms existed for just a few months of the yr, and in any other case dispersed into small communities” [189]. A latest argument for the emergence of Cretan palaces might also relate to Cornești Iarcuri, whereby constructing shared megastructures compensate for emergent energy asymmetries. Driessen and Letesson argue that “their very development was a collaborative effort and an integrating course of however they have been additionally used to stage ceremonial practices … to advocate a symbolic equivalence” between settlement-community clusters that various in dimension, energy, and prosperity [172]. This served to downplay standing variations in precept whereas reinforcing them in apply. Constructions like Cornești Iarcuri introduced energy brokers collectively and supplied a context for controlling this massive settlement community and exterior relations. Given the upland setting of Cornești Iarcuri, it might even have served as a spot of safety, whether or not seasonally or as a disaster response, ought to flooding or violence upset the routines of life in decrease mendacity areas. Seasonal aggregations at this and different websites within the community, utilizing movable shelters, could nicely have been a part of established societal routines and assist in explaining the ephemeral settlement traces at most of the largest websites [189].

This mannequin takes very poor account of different vital websites, akin to Sântana Cetatea Veche or Csanádpalota, however our focus on this paper is on TSG kind websites. They held a more in-depth spatial relationship with Cornești Iarcuri than the above megaforts (Figs 1 and 3), although clearly every of those centres performed vital roles throughout the decrease Pannonian community. We’re solely on the very starting of making an attempt to outline a political geography–outlined because the interface between landscapes and politics–but it’s evident even now that standing and practical differentiation between websites was structured and a part of the self-understanding of those communities from the time they emerged. The biggest websites on this community seem to have been constructed a century or so after the earliest, and so a developmental trajectory must be investigated as extra absolute dates are obtained.

Many or most communities of the decrease Pannonian community have been mutually dependent and intently interwoven with one another and their shared panorama. Coupled with the big inhabitants this represents, the settlement archaeology implies the presence of advanced social establishments and attendant energy buildings to handle interplay, cooperation, competitors and violence [77]. The extra advanced websites will need to have carried out some roles of latest city centres with their specialised areas and options for particular actions from ritual to politics to feasting to defence. Nevertheless, any temptation to name megaforts proto-urban implies a extra “primitive” social order. This undermines our capability to view phenomena just like the decrease Pannonian community as representing alternate trajectories of complexity based mostly round a community of multifunctional or polyfocal centres [128, 190]. Earth and wooden enclosures have been to stay vital as central locations throughout Europe nicely into the primary millennium BC, a length that belies a perpetual state of being caught at a spurious proto-urban stage. This persistence and broad continuity of layouts (e.g. multivallate, open inside areas) could replicate a contra-urban phenomenon that supported a special mannequin of complexity.

TSG collapse

The low-lying location of TSG websites inside a really flat panorama afforded them low variety and uncovered them to extremely comparable dangers, for instance flooding. It was argued above that they emerged inside a selected and comparatively secure climatic area of interest and exploited this panorama in an in depth method by no means practiced earlier than then. The connection shouldn’t be instantly causal; we argue that change in land use was opportunistic relatively than pressured and in the end supported relatively than drove modifications in settlement organisation. Obvious climatic shifts ca. 3.6/3.5 and three.2 kya point out that the LBA was bookended by hotter and drier situations [191193]. These shifts weren’t excessive and nothing signifies they induced catastrophic social change. Taking a decadal perspective, nevertheless, it’s believable that the growing aridification recorded within the 13th to 11th centuries BC incrementally compounded social stressors, turning into a pressure multiplier for different causes of social battle. The exceptionally dense and co-dependent settlement regime of the TSG could itself have laid the inspiration for competitors and battle to come up if sources grew to become scarcer, even marginally so. The finely balanced TSG panorama is an efficient candidate for the basic overshoot collapse mannequin the place growing productiveness and inhabitants co-occur in a moist cycle solely to be undermined by decreased productiveness and capability to maintain a inhabitants in a dry cycle [34, 194]. Cautious of the steadiness between documenting correlation and causation, it’s salient that each settlements and cemeteries have been deserted en masse within the 13th to early 12th century BC within the decrease Pannonian community (Figs 12 and 13). Social change occurred, and it was devastating for these communities. We could discover hints of the responses to this disaster within the materials report. The deposition of hoards of damaged bronze objects is usually thought-about to have been a response to threats to people (e.g. violent battle) or complete communities (e.g. environmental modifications) or as votive choices (e.g. propitiating divine forces) throughout time and area in European prehistory [195198]. A large enhance in hoarding within the south Pannonian Plain is documented exactly from the 13th century to 12th centuries BC [199203].

Settlement location decisions left the social system of the TSG in an inherently fragile state arising from a dependency on specific hydrological situations [29, 31, 34, 147]. This isn’t to say individuals weren’t adaptable, however relatively deviation from a given system as a way to be adaptable undermined the organisational logic of the system. The extent of change to tip such a superb steadiness and push TSG communities past their stability threshold seems to have been comparatively small [204]. One speculation could be {that a} want to hunt out sources past the cramped hinterlands of the TSG community led to a doubling down on cell pastoralism as a lifeway. Entire communities might have taken benefit of mobility to maximise their productive potential in a altering bodily panorama. This is able to have led to gradual disaggregation between lifeways and political programs, probably over a long time, however constituting a tumultuous transitional interval, what Raffield has lately termed a “shatter zone” in social trajectories [205]. The items remained, however their order was damaged.

Conclusion

The 16th century BC was a time of social upheaval within the Pannonian Plain, with the decline of long-established centres of energy, climaxing with the abandonment of settlements and most cemeteries. Ancestral claims to locations of the dwelling and the useless to authentic energy in earlier generations have been minimize off completely. In some areas this was accompanied by depopulation and the simplification of settlement networks. Within the south Pannonian Plain, nevertheless, huge new monumental settlements have been established alongside many smaller websites with comparable options. These emerged along with each appropriated mortuary monuments and the creation of latest cemeteries and mortuary rites.

We have now mentioned the invention of a community of over 100 densely spaced settlements, many with giant, monumental enclosures. Their society was evidently culturally permeable and so they embraced materials and mortuary heritage from disparate traditions. TSG settlements emerged in a specific climatic area of interest that enabled them to efficiently occupy very low-lying elements of the panorama that related them intimately with waterways and wetlands, selling a wetland-oriented lifeway. Rising temperatures and elevated aridity within the 13th to 12th centuries BC seem to have severely impacted on these area of interest human-landscape relations that sustained TSG communities and their relationships with each other. In a society the place solar worship was paramount and even unique, we must also take account of the impression of extreme shifts in climate patterns on beliefs, each in divine forces and the flexibility of social leaders to propitiate them [9, 81, 206].

There was a coherency to the event of the decrease Pannonian community that signifies communities have been contributors in a social phenomenon with a regional political order. They have been motivated to construct huge, enclosed websites with totally different spatial zones inside. Lands locked between this chain have been an integral a part of the community, with enclosures serving as focal factors punctuating a extensively exploited panorama. Websites served totally different roles, starting from standing to perform based mostly, and a few could have been designed to help common inhabitants dispersal and aggregation, probably as seasonal phenomena linked to semi-sedentary lifeways. Developing enclosures was a part of a trajectory that started round 1600 BC, elevated in depth by 1500 BC, noticed a consolidation section round 1400 BC, started to say no after 1300 BC and got here to an finish level by ca. 1200 BC.

The TSG websites as a phenomenon are exceptional because of their visibility permitting them to be remotely recognized after which for his or her extent to be outlined and points of their inside organisation evaluated utilizing distant sensing and fundamental survey information. This community of over 100 websites, spectacular as it’s in its personal proper, was taking part in a cultural panorama that gave rise to the development of the most important monuments of the whole European Bronze Age. Extra placing nonetheless is the creation of the TSG constructed surroundings that operated at a close to total-landscape stage by way of the chain of co-dependent monumental settlements. The legacy of those huge, monumental, defensible central websites of earth and wooden with comparatively low-density occupation could also be recognised within the hillforts of the European Iron Age.

Supporting info

S2 File.

1) Report of flight monitor for taking aerial images documented utilizing GPS for synchronising images and areas; 2) In depth, low-lying drainage community and localised flooding in aerial perspective in March 2020 with archaeological website of Baranda within the margin of the left foreground and the trendy city of Baranda in left nearer background; 3) Aerial view of Kačarevo; 4) Aerial view of Bavanište 2; 5) Aerial view of Mramorak; 6) Aerial view of Pančevo 2—Stari Tamiš; 7) Aerial view of Jabuka; 8) Aerial view of Bavanište; 9) Aerial view of Crepaja, 10) Aerial view of Debeljača; 11) Aerial view of Sakule. Central enclosure is centre area, small “citadel” enclosure is in left background. Footprints from pedestrian survey grid seen inside enclosures; 12) Aerial view of Sefkerin; 13) Aerial view of Opovo; 14) Aerial view of Dobrica; 15) Aerial view of From Debeljača to Crepaja view; 16) Nikolinci Sentinel-2 picture FCC 8-3-2; 17) Lokve Sentinel-2 picture FCC 8-4-3; 18) Aerial view of MBA inform at Židovar. 19) A) Indirect aerial {photograph} of Kacarevo; B) Georeferenced and rectified model of the aerial {photograph} set on the modern land divisions; C) Interpretation and map of all options seen on the aerial {photograph} of Kacarevo. Fig S2.1 Map by Marta Estanqueiro. Knowledge by Darja Grosman. Basemap hillshade derived from ALOS DSM AW3D30 reprinted from https://www.eorcJaxaJp/ALOS/en/dataset/aw3d30/aw3d30_e.htm underneath a CC BY license, with permission from JAXA -Japan Aerospace Exploration Company, unique copyright 2023. Graphs plotted utilizing R 4.2.0. Images S2.2–15 and 18 by Barry Molloy and Darja Grosman. Sentinel 2 photos S2.16 and S2.17 outlined by Marta Estanqueiro. Fig S2.19 images and drawings by Darja Grosman.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288750.s002

(PDF)

S4 File. Illustration of ceramic finds from the websites of Gradište Iđoš, Novo Miloševo 3, Novo Miloševo 4, Matejski Brod, Novi Bečej, Novi Bečej 2, Bašaid 3, Kumane 2, Melenci 4, Srpski Itebej, Novi Itebej, Melenci 7, Jankov Most 2, Klek, Žitište, Zrenjanin 4, Klek 2, Sečanj, Zrenjanin, Boka, Jarkovac, Dobrica, Uzdin, Uzdin 2, Sakule 2, Lokve, Idvor, Baranda, Sakule, Crepaja, Sefkeri, Sefkerin 2, Kačarevo, Glogonj 2, Jabuka, Glogonj, Kačarevo, Pančevo, Mramorak, Mramorak 2, Bavanište, Bavanište 2, Bavanište 3 and Jaša Tomić.

All drawings by Dragan Jovanović.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288750.s004

(KML)

References

  1. 1.
    Risch R, Meller H. Change and Continuity in Europe and the Mediterranean round 1600 bc. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 2015;81: 239–264.
  2. 2.
    Earle T, Ling J, Uhnér C, Stos-Gale Z, Melheim L. The Political Economic system and Metallic Commerce in Bronze Age Europe: Understanding Regional Variability in Phrases of Comparative Benefits and Articulations. Eur J Archaeol. 2015;18: 633–657.
  3. 3.
    Molloy BPC, Mödlinger M. The Organisation and Apply of Metallic Smithing in Later Bronze Age Europe. J World Prehist. 2020;33: 169–232.
  4. 4.
    Orfanou V, Amicone S, Sava V, O’Neill B, Brown LEF, Bruyere C, et al. Forging a New World Order? Interdisciplinary Views on the Administration of Metalworking and Ideological Change within the Late Bronze Age Carpathian Basin. Journal of Archaeological Technique and Principle. 2022.
  5. 5.
    Gimbutas M. Bronze age cultures in central and japanese Europe,. The Hague: Mouton; 1965.
  6. 6.
    Sherratt A. What would a Bronze Age world system seem like? Relations between temperate Europe and the Mediterranean in later prehistory. Journal of European Archaeology. 1993;1: 1–57.
  7. 7.
    Harding A. European societies within the bronze age. Cambridge, UK; New York, USA: Cambridge College Press; 2000.
  8. 8.
    Vandkilde H. Bronzization: The Bronze Age as Pre-Fashionable Globalization. Praehistorische Zeitschrift. 2016;91: 103–123.
  9. 9.
    Kristiansen Okay, Larsson TB. The Rise of Bronze Age Society: Travels, Transmissions and Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2005.
  10. 10.
    Iacono F, Borgna E, Cattani M, Cavazzuti C, Dawson H, Galanakis Y, et al. Establishing the Center Sea: The Late Bronze Age of Mediterranean Europe (1700–900 BC). J Archaeol Res. 2021 [cited 24 Mar 2022].
  11. 11.
    Earle T, Kristiansen Okay. Introduction: Principle and Apply within the Late Prehistory of Europe. In: Earle T, Kristiansen Okay, editors. Organising Bronze Age Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2010. pp. 1–33.
  12. 12.
    Fischl Okay, Kiss V, Kulcsár G, Szeverényi V. Transformations within the Carpathian Basin round 1600 B. C. In: Meller H, Bertemes F, Bork H, Risch R, editors. 1600—kultureller Umbruch im Schatten des Thera-Ausbruchs? = 1600—cultural change within the shadow of the Thera-eruption? François Bertemes, Hans-Rudolf Bork und Roberto Risch. Halle: Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte; 2013. pp. 355–371.
  13. 13.
    Kristiansen Okay. THE RISE OF BRONZE AGE PERIPHERIES AND THE EXPANSION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE 1950–1100 BC. In: Kristiansen Okay, Lindqvist T, Myrdal J, editors. TRADE AND CIVILISATION ECONOMIC NETWORKS AND CULTURAL TIES, FROM PREHISTORY TO THE EARLY MODERN ERA. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2018. pp. 87–112.
  14. 14.
    Sherratt S. The Aegean and the broader world: some ideas on a world programs perspective. In: Parkinson WA, Galaty ML, editors. Archaic State Interplay: The Jap Mediterranean within the Bronze Age. Santa Fe: SAR Press; 2010. pp. 81–197.
  15. 15.
    Harding A. Corneşti-Iarcuri and the rise of mega-forts in Bronze Age Europe. In: Heeb BS, Szentmiklosi A, Krause R, Wemhoff M, editors. Fortifications: Rise and Fall of Defended Websites within the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age of South-East Europe. Berlin: Berliner Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte; 2017. pp. 9–140.
  16. 16.
    Lehmpuhl R, Heeb BS, Szentmiklosi A, Stobbe A, Krause R. The Genesis of the Fortification of Corneşti-larcuri close to the Mureş Decrease Course (Romanian Banat)–A Section Mannequin on the Chronology of the Settlement and Fortification Constructions. In: Hansen S, Krause R, editors. Bronze Age Fortresses in Europe. Bonn: Habelt Verlag; 2019. pp. 253–278.
  17. 17.
    Szentmiklosi A, Heeb BS, Heeb J, Harding A, Krause R, Becker H. Corneşti-Iarcuri—a Bronze Age city within the Romanian Banat? Antiquity. 2011;85: 819–838.
  18. 18.
    Gumnior M, Herbig C, Krause R, Urdea P, Ardelean AC, Bălărie A, et al. Palaeoecological proof from buried topsoils and colluvial layers on the Bronze Age fortification Corneşti-Iarcuri, SW Romania: outcomes from palynological, sedimentological, chronostratigraphical and plant macrofossil analyses. Veget Hist Archaeobot. 2020;29: 173–188.
  19. 19.
    Sava V, Gogâltan F. Earlier than the Rise of the Late Bronze Age Mega Websites/Forts within the Decrease Mureș Basin (twentieth–fifteenth centuries BC. Ziridava Studia Archaeologica. 2022;36: 85–163.
  20. 20.
    O’Shea JM. A River Runs By It: Panorama and the Evolution of Bronze Age Networks within the Carpathian Basin. Journal of World Prehistory. 2011;24: 161–174.
  21. 21.
    Demény A, Kern Z, Czuppon G, Németh A, Schöll-Barna G, Siklósy Z, et al. Center Bronze Age humidity and temperature variations, and societal modifications in East-Central Europe. Quaternary Worldwide. 2019;504: 80–95.
  22. 22.
    Molloy B. Was There a 3.2 ka Disaster in Europe? A Essential Comparability of Climatic, Environmental, and Archaeological Proof for Radical Change throughout the Bronze Age–Iron Age Transition. J Archaeol Res. 2022 [cited 25 Aug 2022].
  23. 23.
    Drăguşin V, Staubwasser M, Hoffmann DL, Ersek V, Onac BP, Veres D. Constraining Holocene hydrological modifications within the Carpathian–Balkan area utilizing speleothem δ18O and pollen-based temperature reconstructions. Local weather of the Previous. 2014;10: 1363–1380.
  24. 24.
    Magyari EK, Demény A, Buczkó Okay, Kern Z, Vennemann T, Fórizs I, et al. A 13,600-year diatom oxygen isotope report from the South Carpathians (Romania): Reflection of winter situations and doable hyperlinks with North Atlantic circulation modifications. Quaternary Worldwide. 2013;293: 136–149.
  25. 25.
    Haliuc A, Veres D, Brauer A, Hubay Okay, Hutchinson SM, Begy R, et al. Palaeohydrological modifications throughout the mid and late Holocene within the Carpathian space, central-eastern Europe. International and Planetary Change. 2017;152: 99–114.
  26. 26.
    Perșoiu A, Onac BP, Wynn JG, Blaauw M, Ionita M, Hansson M. Holocene winter local weather variability in Central and Jap Europe. Scientific Stories. 2017;7: 1196. pmid:28446780
  27. 27.
    Kern Z, Demény A, Perşoiu A, Hatvani IG. Speleothem Data from the Jap A part of Europe and Turkey—Dialogue on Steady Oxygen and Carbon Isotopes. Quaternary. 2019;2: 31.
  28. 28.
    French C. The Palaeo-Environments of Bronze Age Europe. In: Earle T, Kristiansen Okay, editors. Organising Bronze Age Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2010. pp. 34–57.
  29. 29.
    Weiberg E, Finné M. Resilience and persistence of historical societies within the face of local weather change: a case examine from Late Bronze Age Peloponnese. World Archaeology. 2018;50: 584–602.
  30. 30.
    Arponen VPJ, Dörfler W, Feeser I, Grimm S, Groß D, Hinz M, et al. Environmental determinism and archaeology. Understanding and evaluating determinism in analysis design. Archaeological Dialogues. 2019;26: 1–9.
  31. 31.
    Yoffee N. The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Phrases. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Analysis, College of Cambridge; 2019.
  32. 32.
    Manning SW, Lorentzen B, Welton L, Batiuk S, Harrison TP. Past megadrought and collapse within the Northern Levant: The chronology of Inform Tayinat and two historic inflection episodes, round 4.2ka BP, and following 3.2ka BP. PLOS ONE. 2020;15: e0240799. pmid:33119717
  33. 33.
    Butzer KW. Collapse, surroundings, and society. Proceedings of the Nationwide Academy of Sciences. 2012;109: 3632–3639. pmid:22371579
  34. 34.
    Cumming GS, Peterson GD. Unifying Analysis on Social–Ecological Resilience and Collapse. Traits in Ecology & Evolution. 2017;32: 695–713. pmid:28734593
  35. 35.
    Degroot D, Anchukaitis Okay, Bauch M, Burnham J, Carnegy F, Cui J, et al. In the direction of a rigorous understanding of societal responses to local weather change. Nature. 2021;591: 539–550. pmid:33762769
  36. 36.
    Middleton G. Understanding collapse: historical historical past and fashionable myths. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2017.
  37. 37.
    O’Shea JM. Villagers of the maros: a portrait of an early bronze age society. New York: Springer; 2013.
  38. 38.
    Sava V. The Late Bronze Age Pottery in South-Jap Carpathian Basin. Slovenská Archeológia. 2020;LXVIII: 253–296.
  39. 39.
    Gogâltan F. Center Bronze in Banat. Opinions Regarding the Cornesti-Crvenka Group (English abstract). In: Drasovean F, editor. Festschrift fur Florin Medelet. Timisoara: Mirton; 2004. pp. 131–134.
  40. 40.
    Gogâltan F. The Center Bronze Age within the Banat. Previous Controversies on the Vatina Tradition. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Historia. 2022;67: 3–64.
  41. 41.
    Duffy PR, Parditka GM, Giblin JI, Paja L. The issue with tells: classes discovered from absolute courting of Bronze Age mortuary ceramics in Hungary. Antiquity. 2019;93: 63–79.
  42. 42.
    Bóna I. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 1958;9: 211–243.
  43. 43.
    Mozsolics A. Archäologische Beiträge zur Geschichte der Grossen Wanderung. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 1957;8: 119–156.
  44. 44.
    Vicze M. Koszider: break or continuity? In: Vicze M, Poroszlai I, Sümegi P, editors. Koszider: Hoard, Section, Interval? Spherical desk convention on the Koszider drawback. Százhalombatta: Matrica Museum; 2013. pp. 15–30.
  45. 45.
    Mozsolics A. Bronzefunde des Karpatenbeckens: Depotfundhorizonte von Hajdúsámson u. Kosziderpadlás. Budapest: Akadémiai kiadó; 1967.
  46. 46.
    Ilon G. Die Entstehung und Zeitstellung der Hügelgräberkultur (≈1650/1600–1350/1300 BC) in Westtransdanubien. Der Versuch einer Stufengliederung mittels Typochronologie und Radiokarbondaten. Trans Lacum Pelsonem: Prähistorische Forschungen in Südwestungarn (5500–500 v Chr)–Prehistoric Analysis in South-Western Hungary (5500–500 BC). Rahden: Verlag Marie Leidorf; 2019. pp. 253–328.
  47. 47.
    Kapuran A. Velebit: a tumulus tradition necropolis within the Southern Carpathian Basin (Vojvodina, Serbia). Oxford: British Archaeological Stories; 2019.
  48. 48.
    O’Shea JM, Parditka G, Nicodemus A, Kristiansen Okay, Sjögren Okay-G, Paja L, et al. Social formation and collapse within the Tisza-Maros area: courting the Maros Group and its Late Bronze Age successors. Antiquity. 2019;93: 604–623.
  49. 49.
    Vicze M, Oroszlai I, Sümegi P, editors. Koszider: Hoard, Section, Interval? Spherical desk convention on the Koszider drawback. Százhalombatta: Matrica Museum; 2013.
  50. 50.
    Molloy BPC, Jovanović D, Bruyère C, Marić M, Bulatović J, Mertl P, et al. A New Bronze Age Mega-fort in Southeastern Europe: Latest Archaeological Investigations at Gradište Iđoš and their Regional Significance. Journal of Subject Archaeology. 2020;45: 293–314.
  51. 51.
    Todorović J. Praistorijska Karaburma 2: Nekropola Bronzanog Doba. Belgrade: Muzej Grada Beograda; 1977.
  52. 52.
    Girić M. Budžak-Livade, Iđoš –nekropola srednjeg i poznog bronzanog doba. Arheološki pregled. 1965;7: 39–45.
  53. 53.
    Girić M. Budžak-Livade, Iđoš –nekropola srednjeg i poznog bronzanog doba. Arheološki pregled. 1968;10: 28–29.
  54. 54.
    Kiss V. Center Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in western Hungary. Budapest: Varia Archaeologica Hungarica; 2012.
  55. 55.
    Szentmiklosi A. The Relations Of The Cruceni-Belegiš Tradition With The Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare Tradition. Analele Banatului. 2006;XIV: 229–270.
  56. 56.
    Tasić N. Historic improvement of Bronze Age cultures in Vojvodina. Starinar. 2004;LIII–LIV: 23–34.
  57. 57.
    Љуштина М. Изазови средњег бронзаног доба: ватинска култура и балкански суседи. Београд: Универзитет у Београду – Филозофски факултет; 2022. Out there: http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3760
  58. 58.
    Garašanin M. The Bronze Age within the Central Balkan Space. 2nd ed. In: Boardman J, Edwards IES, Hammond NGL, Sollberger E, editors. The Cambridge historical historical past: Quantity III Half 1: The Prehistory of the Balkans; and the Center East and the Aegean world, tenth to eighth centuries BC. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2006. pp. 163–186.
  59. 59.
    Bukvić L. Kanelovana keramika Gava kompleksa u Banatu. Novi Unhappy: SANU; 2000.
  60. 60.
    Coxon S. Variability within the Chaîne Opératoire: The Case of Belegiš cremation vessels. In: Jørgensen L, Sofaer J, Sørensen M, editors. Creativity bronze age understanding innovation pottery textile and metalwork manufacturing. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2018. pp. 107–114. Out there: https://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/archaeology/archaeology-europe-and-near-and-middle-east/creativity-bronze-age-understanding-innovation-pottery-textile-and-metalwork-production
  61. 61.
    Vranić S, Tasić N. Belegiš: Stojića Gumno—nekropola spaljenih pokojnika. Beograd: Muzej grada Beograda; 2002.
  62. 62.
    Bulatović A, Molloy B, Filipović V. The Balkan-Aegean migrations revisited: Modifications in materials tradition and settlement patterns within the Late Bronze Age Central Balkans within the mild of latest information. Starinar. 2021;71: 61–105.
  63. 63.
    Griffiths S, Carlin N, Edwards B, Overton N, Johnston P, Thomas J. Occasions, narrative and information: Why new chronologies or ethically Bayesian approaches ought to change how we write archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2023; 14696053231153500.
  64. 64.
    Roberts BW, Vander Linden M. Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Materials Tradition, Variability, and Transmission. In: Roberts BW, Vander Linden M, editors. Investigating archaeological cultures materials tradition, variability, and transmission. New York: Springer; 2011. pp. 1–22. Out there: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=763501
  65. 65.
    Dores Cruz M. “Pots are pots, not individuals:” materials tradition and ethnic id within the Banda Space (Ghana), nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Azania: Archaeological Analysis in Africa. 2011;46: 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/0067270X.2011.629525
  66. 66.
    Gogâltan F, Găvan A, Lie M, Fazecaș G, Cordoș C, Kienlin T. Exploring the Bronze Age Tells and Inform-like Settlements from the Jap Carpathian Basin. Outcomes of a Analysis Challenge. In: Blanco-González A, Kienlin T, editors. Present Approaches to Tells within the Prehistoric Previous World. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2020. pp. 73–96.
  67. 67.
    Gogâltan F, Cordoş C, Ignat A, editors. Bronze Age inform, tell-like and mound-like settlements on the japanese frontier of the Carpathian Basin: historical past of analysis. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Mega; 2014.
  68. 68.
    Gogâltan F. Fortified Bronze Age inform settlements within the Carpathian Basin: a common overview. In: Czebreszuk J, Kadrow S, Müller J, editors. Defensive buildings from Central Europe to the Aegean within the third and 2nd millennia BC. Poznań and Bonn: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie and Habelt; 2008. pp. 39–56.
  69. 69.
    Artursson M. Settlement Construction and Organisation. In: Earle T, Kristiansen Okay, editors. Organising Bronze Age Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2010. pp. 87–122.
  70. 70.
    Falkenstein F, Hänsel B, Medovic P. Feudvar close to Mošorin (Serbia)–Excavations and Analysis in a Micro-region on the Confluence of the Danube and Tisza: a recapitulation after thirty years. F. Falkenstein (Hrsg.), Feudvar Ausgrabungen und Forschungen in einer Mikroregion am Zusammenfluss von Donau und Theiß III. 1 (Würzburg 2016) S. 5–36. In: Kroll H, Reed Okay, editors. Die Archäobotanik: Feudvar Ausgrabungen und Forschungen in einer Mikroregion am Zusammenfluss von Donau und Theiß III. Würzburg: Würzburg College Press; 2016. pp. 5–36.
  71. 71.
    Kienlin T, Fischl Okay, Marta L. Exploring Divergent Trajectories in Bronze Age Landscapes: Inform Settlement within the Hungarian Borsod Plain and the Romanian Ier Valley. Ziridava Studia Archaeologica. 2017; 93–129.
  72. 72.
    Szeverenyi V, Kulcsar G. Center Bronze Age Settlement and Society in Central Hungary. In: Jaeger M, Czebreszuk J, editors. Enclosed House–Open Society Contact and Alternate within the Context of Bronze Age Fortified Settlements in Central Europe. Poznań & Bonn; 2012. pp. 287–351.
  73. 73.
    Staniuk R. EARLY AND MIDDLE BRONZE AGE CHRONOLOGY OF THE CARPATHIAN BASIN REVISITED: QUESTIONS ANSWERED OR PERSISTENT CHALLENGES? Radiocarbon. 2021;63: 1525–1546.
  74. 74.
    Stig Sørensen ML, Rebay-Salisbury Okay. Landscapes of the Physique: Burials of the Center Bronze Age in Hungary. European Journal of Archaeology. 2008;11: 49–74.
  75. 75.
    Dani J, Fischl Okay, Kiss V, Kulcsar G, Szeverényi V. Dividing area, dividing society: fortified settlements within the Carpathian Basin (c. 2300–1500 BC). In: Meller H, Friedrich S, Küßner M, Stäuble H, Risch R, editors. Siedlungsarchäologie des Endneolithikums und der frühen Bronzezezeit–Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Settlement Archaeology. Halle: Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle; 2019. pp. 851–868. Out there: https://www.academia.edu/43123228/Dividing_space_dividing_society_fortified_settlements_in_the_Carpathian_Basin_c_2300_1500_BC_
  76. 76.
    Kienlin T. Social Life on Bronze Age Tells. Define of a Apply-oriented Method. In: Blanco-González A, Kienlin T, editors. Present Approaches to Tells within the Prehistoric Previous World. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2020. pp. 173–188.
  77. 77.
    O’Shea J, Nicodemus A. “… the closest run factor…” The Genesis and Collapse of a Bronze Age Polity within the Maros Valley of Southeastern Europe. In: Gyucha A, editor. Comparative Approaches to Inhabitants Aggregation and Early Urbanization. New York: SUNY Collection; 2019. pp. 61–80.
  78. 78.
    Dzięgielewski Okay, Przybyła MS, Gawlik A. Reconsidering Migration in Bronze and Early Iron Age Europe: Bridging a Hole in European Mobility? In: Dzięgielewski Okay, Przybyła MS, Gawlik A, editors. Migration in Bronze and Early Iron Age Europe. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka; 2010. pp. 9–36.
  79. 79.
    Earle T, Kreiter A, Klehm C, Ferguson JR, Vicze M. Bronze Age ceramic economic system: the Benta Valley, Hungary = Economie des céramiques pendant l’Âge du Bronze: la vallée de Benta, Hongrie = Bronzezeitliche Keramik-Ökonomie: das Benta-Tal in Ungarn. European journal of archaeology. 2011;14: 419–440.
  80. 80.
    Gogâltan F, Cordoș C, Ignat A. Bronze Age inform, tell-like and mound-like settlements on the Jap frontier of the Carpathian Basin: historical past of analysis. 2014.
  81. 81.
    Johnson S. Why did historical civilizations fail? London: Routledge; 2017.
  82. 82.
    Storey R, Storey GR. Rome and the Traditional Maya: Evaluating the Sluggish Collapse of Civilizations. London; New York: Routledge; 2017
  83. 83.
    Dömötör L. Római korbeli edények a pécskai Nagy-sáncban. Archaeologiai Értesítő. 1901;21: 327–335.
  84. 84.
    Roska. Ásatás a pécska-szemlaki határban levő Nagy Sáczon. Dolgozatok az Erdélyi Múzeum érem- és régiségtárából. 1912;3: 1–73.
  85. 85.
    Găvan A, Gogâltan F. “Zentrum un Peripherie?” Der bronzezeitliche Inform von Pecica “Șanțul Mare” (Kreis Arad, Rumänien). In: Nessel B, Heske I, Brandherm D, editors. Ressourcen und Rohstoffe in der Bronzezeit Nutzug–Distribution–Kontrolle. Wünsdorf: Brandenburgisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologisches Landesmuseum; 2014. pp. 28–40.
  86. 86.
    Mirković-Marić N, Marić M, Jovanović D. Заштитна археолошка ископавања на локалитету 92, Иђош, општина Кикинда. Glasnik: Srpskog Arheološkog Društva. In Press.
  87. 87.
    Sava V, Ignat A. The Starting Of The Late Bronze Age In The Decrease Mureş Basin. An Overview. In: Gogâltan F, Cordoș C, editors. Prehistoric settlements: social, financial and cultural points Seven research within the Carpathian space. Cluj-Napoca: Editura MEGA; 2016. pp. 181–200.
  88. 88.
    Gogâltan F, Sava V. Înainte de apariția mega-forturilor bronzului târziu de la Mureșul de Jos (2000/1900-1600/1500 BC) Earlier than the Emergence of the Late Bronze Mega-Forts within the Decrease Mureș Basin (2000/1900-1600/1500 BC). Crisia. 2019;XLIX: 65–94.
  89. 89.
    Sava V, Gogâltan F, Krause R. First Steps within the Courting of the Bronze Age Mega-Fort in Sântana-Cetatea Veche (Southwestern Romania). In: Krause R, Hansen S, editors. Bronze Age Fortresses in Europe Proceedings of the Second Worldwide LOEWE Convention, 9–13 October 2017 in Alba Julia. Frankfurt: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH; 2019. pp. 161–177.
  90. 90.
    Gogâltan F, Sava V, Krause R. Sântana-Cetatea Veche. A Late Bronze Age Mega-fort within the Decrease Mureș Basin in Southwestern Romania. In: Hansen S, Krause R, editors. Materialisierung von Konflikten Beiträge der Dritten Internationalen LOEWE-Konferenz vom 24 bis 27 September 2018 in Fulda / Materialisation of Conflicts Proceedings of the Third Worldwide LOEWE Convention, 24–27 September 2018 in Fulda. Bonn: Habelt Verlag; 2019. pp. 191–222.
  91. 91.
    Szeverenyi V, Priskin A, Czukor P, Torma A, Toth A. Subsistence, Settlement and Society within the Late Bronze Age of Southeast Hungary: A Case Research of the Fortified Settlement at Csanádpalota–Földvár. In: Kneisel J, Dal Corso M, Kirleis W, Scholz D, Taylor N, Tiedtke V, editors. The Third Meals Revolution? Setting the Bronze Age Desk: Widespread Traits in Financial and Subsistence Methods in Bronze Age Europeby Jutta Kneisel (Editor), Marta Dal Corso (Editor), Wiebke Kirleis (Editor), Heiko Scholz. Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolph Habelt; 2015. pp. 97–118.
  92. 92.
    Sava V, Hurezan G, Marginean F. Șagu Sit A1_1. A Late Bronze Age settlement on the decrease Mureș. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Mega; 2011.
  93. 93.
    Hänsel B, Medović P. Vorbericht über die jugoslawisch-deutschen Ausgrabungen in der Siedlung von Feudvar bei Mosorin (Gem. Titel, Vojvodina) von 1986–1990. Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommssion. 1991;72: 45–204.
  94. 94.
    Falkenstein F. Feudvar: Ausgrabungen und Forschungen in einer Mikroregion am Zusammenfluß von Donau und Theiß: Die Siedlungsgeschichte des Titeler Plateaus. Kiel: Oetker/Voges; 1998. Out there: https://is.muni.cz/publication/671835/en/Feudvar-Ausgrabungen-und-Forschungen-in-einer-Mikroregion-am-Zusammenfluss-von-Donau-und-Theiss/Falkenstein-Hansel-Medovic
  95. 95.
    Falkenstein F. Die Siedlungsgeschichte des Titeler Plateaus. Kiel: Oetker/Voges; 1998.
  96. 96.
    Ljuština M. Dunărea conectează: așezările din epoca de mijloc a bronzului de la Omoljica-Zlatica și Pančevo-Najeva Ciglana vs. vecinii lor de la Vinča-Belo Brdo, nordul Serbiei / The Danube Connects: Center Bronze Age Settlements at Omoljica-Zlatica and Pančevo-Najeva Ciglana vs. their Neighbours from Vinča-Belo Brdo, North Serbia. Istros. 2015;21: 57–106.
  97. 97.
    Radojčić N. Zlatica u Omoljici i Najeva Ciglana u Vojlovici kod Pančeva: Keramički nalazi bronzanog doba. Belgrade: Narodni Muzej; 2013.
  98. 98.
    Gogâltan F. Foeni “Cimitirul Ortodox”, Timiş County. In: Gogâltan F, Cordoș C, Ignat A, editors. Bronze Age inform, tell-like and mound-like setlements on the japanese frontier of the Carpathian Basin Historical past of analysis. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Mega; 2014. pp. 98–103.
  99. 99.
    Gogâltan F. Foeni “Gomila Lupului I”, Timiş County. In: Gogâltan F, Cordoș C, Ignat A, editors. Bronze Age inform, tell-like and mound-like setlements on the japanese frontier of the Carpathian Basin Historical past of analysis. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Mega; 2014. pp. 104–110.
  100. 100.
    Gogâltan F. Butin, Timiş County. In: Gogâltan F, Cordoș C, Ignat A, editors. Bronze Age inform, tell-like and mound-like setlements on the japanese frontier of the Carpathian Basin Historical past of analysis. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Mega; 2014. pp. 39–40.
  101. 101.
    Ljuština M. The Starting of the Late Bronze Age in Southern Banat and the Finish of hte Vatin Tradition: Case Research of Židovar. In: Ložnjak Dizdar D, Dizdar M, editors. The Starting of the Late Bronze Age Between the Jap Alps and the Danube. Zagreb: Institut za arheologiju; 2014. pp. 273–284.
  102. 102.
    Jovanović D, Jevtić M. Ostava Srebrnih Predmeta Sa Židovara. Vršac: Gradski muzej Vršac.; 2006.
  103. 103.
    Harding A. Die Schwerter Im Ehemaligen Jugoslawien. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH; 1995.
  104. 104.
    Milleker B. A Vattinai Östelep. Történelmi És Régészeti Értesitö. 1905;XXI: 1–75.
  105. 105.
    Vasić R. Die nadeln im Zentralbakan (Vojvodina, Serbien, Kosovo und Makedonien). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag; 2003.
  106. 106.
    Agapiou A, Hegyi A, Gogâltan F, Stavilă A, Sava V, Sarris A, et al. Exploring the most important identified Bronze Age earthworks in Europe by way of medium decision multispectral satellite tv for pc photos. Worldwide Journal of Utilized Earth Statement and Geoinformation. 2023;118: 103239.
  107. 107.
    Heeb BS, Szentmiklosi A, Bălărie A, Lehmpuhl R, Krause R. Corneşti-Iarcuri– 10 years of analysis (2007–2016). Some vital preliminary outcomes. In: Heeb BS, Szentmiklosi A, Krause R, Wemhoff M, editors. Fortifications: Rise and Fall of Defended Websites within the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age of South-East Europe. Berlin: Berliner Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte; 2017. pp. 217–228.
  108. 108.
    Szeverényi V, Czukor P, Priskin A, Szalontai C. Latest work on Late Bronze Age fortified settlements in south-east Hungary. In: Heeb BS, Szentmiklosi A, Krause R, Wemhoff M, editors. Fortifications: Rise and Fall of Defended Websites within the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age of South-East Europe. Berlin: Berliner Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte; 2017. pp. 135–148.
  109. 109.
    Krause R, Szentmiklosi A, Heeb BS. Cornești-Iarcuri. Die Ausgrabungen 2013 und 2014 in der befestigten Großsiedlung der späten Bronzezeit. Eurasia Antiqua. 2019;22: 133–84.
  110. 110.
    Gogâltan F, Borș C. Peace and Battle within the Bronze Age on the Jap Frontier of the Carpathian Basin: The Evolution and Manifestation of Social Stratification. In: Gyucha A, Parkinson WA, editors. First Kings of Europe: From Farmers to Rulers in Prehistoric Southeastern Europe. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press; 2022. pp. 108–123.
  111. 111.
    Gaydarska B, Chapman J. Megasites in Prehistoric Europe: The place Strangers and Kinsfolk Met. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2022. Out there: https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/megasites-in-prehistoric-europe/600B1772058C91B336342897D47E5FF5
  112. 112.
    Jarosz P, Koledin J, Włodarczak P. Danubian Route of the Yamnaya Tradition: The Barrows of Vojvodina. Budapest: Archaeolingua Alapitvany; 2022.
  113. 113.
    Dmitrović Okay, Molloy BPC. A contribution to the Early Bronze Age chronology of the area of the West Morava River, Serbia. In: Sirbu V, Schuster C, Hortopan Graves D, editors. Cenotaphs and Votive Deposits of Weapons in Europe—Bronze and Iron Ages. Targu Jiu: Editura Maiastra; 2022. pp. 49–64.
  114. 114.
    Bulatović A, Gori M, Linden MV. RADIOCARBON DATING THE 3RD MILLENNIUM BC IN THE CENTRAL BALKANS: A RE-EXAMINATION OF THE EARLY BRONZE AGE SEQUENCE. Radiocarbon. 2020;62: 1163–1191.
  115. 115.
    Filipović V. Nova istraživanja nekropola razvijenog bronzanog doba u severozapadnoj Srbiji, hronološka i terminološka pitanja. Glasnik: Srpskog Arheološkog Društva. 2013;29: 51–83.
  116. 116.
    Diaconescu D, Bunoiu V, Hegyi A, Pinca R, Rusu A, Quatert R, et al. Raport De Cercetare Arheologică Privindobiectivul De La Susani, Com. Traian Vuia, Jud.Timiș. Punct: Grămurada De La Jupani. Patrimonium Banaticum. 2018;VIII: 25–36.
  117. 117.
    Gogâltan F. Neuere siedlungsarchäologische Forschungen im östlichen Karpatenbecken (2800–1500 v. Chr.). In: Meller H, Friedrich S, Küßner M, Stäuble H, Risch R, editors. Siedlungsarchäologie des Endneolithikums und der frühen Bronzezezeit–Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Settlement Archaeology. Halle: Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle; 2019. pp. 869–894. Out there: https://www.academia.edu/43123228/Dividing_space_dividing_society_fortified_settlements_in_the_Carpathian_Basin_c_2300_1500_BC_
  118. 118.
    Ćuković MB. Dva Nova Nalazista Belegiske Kulture u Okolini Panceva. Glasnik Muzeja Banata. 2013;15: 6–26.
  119. 119.
    Dorogostaisky L, Ardalean A. Rezultatele Cercetărilor de Teren (2014) A Patru Mari Așezări Fortificate de la Sfârșitul Epocii Bronzului din Câmpia de Vest: Biled–Șandra, Cenei, Sânnicolau Mare Și Pecica. Arheovest. 2014;II: 323–347.
  120. 120.
    Dorogostaisky L, Hegyi A. Noi Ipoteze De Lucru Pentru Cercetarea Epocii Bronzului În Banat (II). Un Posibil Advanced De Fortificații Și Așezări În Arealul Localităților Variaș –Satchinez (Jud. Timiș). Arheovest. 2017;V: 1–29.
  121. 121.
    Girić M. Nalazishta Starijeg Gvozdenog Doba u Cevernom Banatu. In: Tasić N, editor. Kulture gvozdenog doba Jugoslovenskog Podunavlja. Belgrade: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Balkanološki institut; 1994. pp. 21–30.
  122. 122.
    Estanqueiro M, Šalamon A, Lewis H, Molloy B, Jovanović D. Sentinel-2 imagery analyses for archaeological website detection: an software to Late Bronze Age settlements in Serbian Banat, southern Carpathian Basin. Journal of Archaeological Science: Stories. In press.
  123. 123.
    Hristov M. Late Bronze Age Settlement Shut To Banatski Dvor. Materials for the examine of the Cultural Monuments of Vojvodina. 2017;XXX: 7–31.
  124. 124.
    Трифуновић C, editor. Археолошка топографија Баната, Општина Нови Кнежевац. Novi Unhappy: Музеј Војводине; 2012.
  125. 125.
    Трифуновић C. Археолошка Топографија Баната, Општина Чока. Novi Unhappy: Музеј Војводине; 2016.
  126. 126.
    Ђорђевић J, Ђорђевић B. Археолошка топографија подручја Града Панчева 1. Pancevo: Narodni Muzej; 2020.
  127. 127.
    Трифуновић C. Археолошка топографија подручја града Кикинде. Novi Unhappy: Музеј Војводине; 2020.
  128. 128.
    Moore T, Fernández-Götz M. Bringing the Nation to City: ‘Rurban’ Landscapes in Iron Age Europe. Journal of City Archaeology. 2022;5: 101–125.
  129. 129.
    Fernández-Götz M. Coming Collectively within the Iron Age: Inhabitants Aggregation and City Dynamics in Temperate Europe. In: Gyucha A, editor. Comparative Approaches to Inhabitants Aggregation and Early Urbanization. New York: SUNY Collection; 2019. pp. 81–104.
  130. 130.
    Dragović S, Maksimović L, Radojević V, Cicmil M, Pantelić S. Istorijski Razvoj Uređenja Vodnog Režima Zemljišta Primenom Odvodnjavanja I Navodnjavanja U Vojvodini. Vodoprivreda. 2005;37: 287–298.
  131. 131.
    Драгослав П, Минучер М, Владимир С. Мелиорационе мере одводњавања као фактор географске трансформације предела у алувијалним равнима Дунава и Тисе у Бачкој. Зборник радова – Географски факултет Универзитета у Београду. 2012;60. Out there: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/30596
  132. 132.
    Popov D, Marković SB, Štrbac D. Generations of meanders in Serbian a part of Tisa valley. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijic”, SASA. 2008; 29–42.
  133. 133.
    Milošev Ž, Savić R. Značaj Pojave Ekstremnih Voda Dunava Na Području Vojvodine. Godina. 2009;33: 147–154.
  134. 134.
    Belić M, Nešić Lj, Ćirić V, Vasin J, Milošev D, Šeremešić S. Traits and Classification of Gleyic Soils of Banat. Journal of area and vegetable crop analysis. 2011;48: 375–382.
  135. 135.
    Dimitrijević M, Karamata S, Sikošek B, Veselinović D. Tumač za checklist Pančevo L33-125, Osnovna geološka karta 1:100.000. Belgrade: Savezni geološki zavod; 1975.
  136. 136.
    De Marinis G. Continuity and discontinuity in Northern Italy from the Latest to the Closing Bronze Age: A view from North-western Italy. In: Cardarelli A, Cazella A, Frangipane M, Peroni R, editors. Atti del convegno internazionale “Le ragioni del cambiamento/Causes for change” Roma, 15–17 Giugno 2006. Roma: Quasar; 2009. pp. 535–545.
  137. 137.
    Dalla Longa E. Settlement dynamics and territorial group within the center and low Veneto plain south of the traditional Adige river within the Bronze Age. Preihstoria Alpina. 2019;49: 95–121.
  138. 138.
    Dalla Longa E, Dal Corso M, Vicenzutto D, Nicosia C, Cupitò M. The Bronze Age settlement of Fondo Paviani (Italy) in its territory. Hydrography, settlement distribution, surroundings and in-site evaluation. Journal of Archaeological Science: Stories. 2019;28: 102018.
  139. 139.
    Cavazzuti C, Enviornment A, Cardarelli A, Fritzl M, Gavranović M, Hajdu T, et al. The First ‘Urnfields’ within the Plains of the Danube and the Po. J World Prehist. 2022;35: 45–86.
  140. 140.
    Molloy BPC, Bruyere C, Jovanović D. Rethinking Materials Tradition Markers for Mobility and Migration within the Globalising European Later Bronze Age: A Comparative View from the Po Valley and Pannonian Plain. In: Fernandez-Gotz M, Nimura C, Stockhammer PW, Cartright R, editors. Rethinking Migrations in Late Prehistoric Eurasia. Oxford: Oxford College Press; 2023. pp. 142–169.
  141. 141.
    Gavranović M, Mehofer M, Kapuran A, Koledin J, Mitrović J, Papazovska A, et al. Emergence of monopoly–Copper trade networks throughout the Late Bronze Age within the western and central Balkans. PLOS ONE. 2022;17: e0263823. pmid:35275905
  142. 142.
    Fairchild IJ, Baker A. Speleothem Science: From Course of to Previous Environments. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
  143. 143.
    Velle G, Brooks SJ, Birks HJB, Willassen E. Chironomids as a instrument for inferring Holocene local weather: an evaluation based mostly on six websites in southern Scandinavia. Quaternary Science Opinions. 2005;24: 1429–1462.
  144. 144.
    Campbell D, Humphries P, McCasker N, Nielsen D. Subfossil chironomid head capsules reveal assemblage variations in everlasting and momentary wetlands of south-eastern Australia. Hydrobiologia. 2018;809: 91–110.
  145. 145.
    Tóth M, Magyari EK, Buczkó Okay, Braun M, Panagiotopoulos Okay, Heiri O. Chironomid-inferred Holocene temperature modifications within the South Carpathians (Romania). The Holocene. 2015;25: 569–582.
  146. 146.
    Burke A, Peros MC, Wren CD, Pausata FSR, Riel-Salvatore J, Moine O, et al. The archaeology of local weather change: The case for cultural variety. PNAS. 2021;118. pmid:34301875
  147. 147.
    Rivera-Collazo I. Atmosphere, local weather and folks: Exploring human responses to local weather change. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2022;68: 101460.
  148. 148.
    Magny M, Galop D, Bellintani P, Desmet M, Didier J, Haas JN, et al. Late-Holocene climatic variability south of the Alps as recorded by lake-level fluctuations at Lake Ledro, Trentino, Italy: The Holocene. 2009 [cited 14 Oct 2020].
  149. 149.
    Bradtmöller M, Grimm S, Riel-Salvatore J. Resilience idea in archaeological apply–An annotated assessment. Quaternary Worldwide. 2017;446: 3–16.
  150. 150.
    Узелац А. Кумани у средњовековној Србији. Гласник: Историјски архив Ваљево. 2009;43: 5–17.
  151. 151.
    Mielczarek M, Brzezinski R. The Sarmatians 600 BC-AD 450: No. 373. 1st version. Oxford: Osprey Publishing; 2002.
  152. 152.
    Daróczi T-T, Bălărie A, Olsen J, Birclin M. Banatian DeathMetals: Radiocarbon Courting of Cremation Burials of the Setting Bronze Age and Dawning Iron Age. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 2023; 1–21.
  153. 153.
    Száraz C. Late Bronze Age Websites in Zala County (Southwestern Hungary). In: Kulcsár G, Szabó GV, editors. State of the Hungarian Bronze Age Analysis: Proceedings of the Convention Held Between seventeenth and 18th of December 2014. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Analysis Centre for the Humanities, Institute of Archaeology; 2017. pp. 51–84.
  154. 154.
    Gogâltan F, Stavilă A. The Late Bronze Age Settlement from Giroc (Timiș County). The 1992–1993 archaeological excavations. Ziridava Studia Archaeologica. 2021; 189–242.
  155. 155.
    Mirković-Marić N, Jovanović D. Protecting Archaeological Excavations At Web site 92, Iđos, Kikinda Municipality. Gazette of the Society of Conservators. 2022;46.
  156. 156.
    Vandkilde H. Breakthrough of the Nordic Bronze Age: Transcultural Warriorhood and a Carpathian Crossroad within the Sixteenth Century BC. European Journal of Archaeology. 2014;17: 602–633.
  157. 157.
    Cardarelli A, Cavazzuti C, Fritzi M, Gavranovic M, Hajdu T, Kiss V, et al. The connections between the plains of the Po and the Danube throughout the Bronze Age seen by way of the unfold of the ‘urnfield mannequin.’ Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche. 2020;LXX: 231–243.
  158. 158.
    Iacono F. The Archaeology of Late Bronze Age Interplay and Mobility on the Gates of Europe: Individuals, Issues and Networks across the Southern Adriatic Sea. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2019.
  159. 159.
    Molloy BPC. Nought could endure however Mutability: Intercultural encounters and materials transformations within the thirteenth to eleventh century BC Southeast Europe. In: Molloy BPC, editor. Of Odysseys and Oddities: Scales and modes of interplay within the prehistoric Aegean. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2016. pp. 343–384.
  160. 160.
    Ruppenstein F. Migration Occasions in Greece on the finish of the second millennium BC and their doable Balkanic background. In: Maran J, Băjenaru R, Ailincăi S-C, Popescu A-D, Hansen S, editors. Objects, Concepts and Vacationers: Contacts Between the Balkans, the Aegean and Western Anatolia In the course of the Bronze and Early Iron Age: Quantity to the Reminiscence of Alexandru Vulpe: Proceedings of the Convention in Tulcea, 10–13 November, 2017. Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH; 2020. pp. 107–122.
  161. 161.
    Jung R, Mehofer M. Mycenaean Greece and Bronze Age Italy: Cooperation, commerce or struggle? Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt. 2013;43: 175–192.
  162. 162.
    Mödlinger M. Defending the Physique in Battle and Fight: Metallic Physique Armour in Bronze Age Europe. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften; 2018. Out there: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30648
  163. 163.
    Mödlinger M. From Greek boar tusk helmets to the primary European steel helmets: New approaches on improvement and date. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 2013;32: TBC.
  164. 164.
    Mödlinger M. Bronze Age Bell Helmets: New Elements on Typology, Chronology and Manufacture. Praehistorische Zeitschrift. 2013;88: 155–179.
  165. 165.
    Mödlinger M. European Bronze Age Cuirasses: points of chronology, typology, manufacture and utilization. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseum Mainz. 2013.
  166. 166.
    Molloy BPC. European Bronze Age Symbols in Prehistoric Greece? Reconsidering Bronze Shields and Spears from Delphi in Their Wider Context. Hesperia. 2018;87: 279–309.
  167. 167.
    Harding A. The Mycenaeans and Europe. London: Tutorial Press; 1984.
  168. 168.
    Bouzek J. Late Bronze Age Greece and the Balkans: A Evaluate of the Current Image. The Annual of the British Faculty at Athens. 1994;89: 217–234.
  169. 169.
    Molloy B. A warrior’s journey? Some latest taxonomic, hint aspect and lead isotope analyses of Mediterranean Later Bronze Age metalwork within the Central and West Balkans. Papers in honour of Rastko Vasić eightieth Birthday. Belgrade: Institute of Archaeology; 2019. pp. 143–154.
  170. 170.
    Primas M, Pernicka E. Der Depot fund von Oberwilflingen. Neue Ergebnissezur Zirkulation von Metallbarren. Germania. 1998;76: 35–65.
  171. 171.
    Trampuž-Orel N. Spectrometric Analysis of the Late Bronze Age Hoard Finds. In: Teržan B, editor. Hoards and Particular person Metallic Finds from the Eneolithic and Bronze Ages in Slovenia. Ljubljana: Narodni Musej; 1996. pp. 165–243.
  172. 172.
    Driessen J, Letesson Q. The Gathering: Collectivity and the Improvement of Bronze Age Cretan Society. J Archaeol Res. 2023 [cited 28 Mar 2023].
  173. 173.
    Davis O. Danebury and the Heuneburg: Creating Communities in Early Iron Age Europe. European Journal of Archaeology. 2019;22: 67–90.
  174. 174.
    Sharples N. Social Relations in Later Prehistory: Wessex within the First Millennium BC. Oxford: Oxford College Press; 2010.
  175. 175.
    Sharples N. Constructing Communities and Creating Identities within the 1st Millennium BC. In: Haselgrove C, Pope R, editors. The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the Close to Continent. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2007. pp. 174–184.
  176. 176.
    Moore T Alternate options to Urbanism? Reconsidering Oppida and the City Query in Late Iron Age Europe. Journal of World Prehistory. 2017;30: 281–300.
  177. 177.
    Driessen J. Political Geographies of Bronze Age Crete Straitjackets, Uncertainties and Some Questions. In: van Weingarten G-J, Driessen J, editors. Political Geographies of the Bronze Age Aegean. Leuven: Peeters; 2022. pp. 3–14.
  178. 178.
    Tarbay JB, Mitrović J. Weapons and Warriors within the Late Bronze Age of the Northern and Central Balkans. In: Gyucha A, Parkinson WA, editors. First Kings of Europe: From Farmers to Rulers in Prehistoric Southeastern Europe. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press; 2022. pp. 124–145.
  179. 179.
    Molloy BPC, Horn C. Weapons and Warfare in Bronze Age Europe. In: Fibiger L, Fagan GG, Hudson M, editors. The Cambridge World Historical past of Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 2020.
  180. 180.
    Molloy BPC. Searching warriors: The transformation of weapons, fight practices and society in Bronze Age Eire. European Journal of Archaeology. 2017.
  181. 181.
    Harding A. Warriors and weapons in Bronze Age Europe. Budapest: Archaeolingua Alapítvány; 2007.
  182. 182.
    Drews R. Militarism and the Indo-Europeanizing of Europe. Kindle. Milton: Taylor and Francis; 2017. Out there: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=4857871
  183. 183.
    Harding A. Enclosing and Excluding in Bronze Age Europe. In: Harding A, Sievers S, Venclová N, editors. Enclosing the Previous Inside and Exterior in Prehistory. Sheffield: J.R. Collis; 2006. pp. 97–115.
  184. 184.
    Ginn V, Plunkett G. Filling the gaps: A chronology of Bronze Age settlement in Eire. Journal of Irish Archaeology. 2020;XXIX: 41–61.
  185. 185.
    Earle T. Bronze Age Economics: The First Political Economies. London: Taylor and Francis; 2002.
  186. 186.
    Müller J. Social Topographies and the Improvement of Early Bronze Age Societies in Central Europe. In: Meller H, Bertemes F, Bork H, Risch R, editors. 1600 –Cultural Change within the Shadow of the Thera-Eruption? Halle: Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle; 2013. pp. 527–538.
  187. 187.
    Molloy BPC, Bruyere C, Jovanović D. Social topographies of later Bronze Age megaforts of the southeast Carpathian Basin: The case of Serbian Banat. In: Krause R, Hansen S, editors. Prehistoric Battle Analysis: Materialisation of Conflicts. Berlin; Forthcoming.
  188. 188.
    Richer Z. Towards a Social Topography: Standing as a Spatial Apply. Sociological Principle. 2015;33: 347–368.
  189. 189.
    Graeber D, Wengrow D. The Daybreak of All the things: A New Historical past of Humanity. First Version. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2021.
  190. 190.
    Harding A. The query of proto-urban websites in Later Prehistoric Europe. Origini. 2018;XLII: 317–338.
  191. 191.
    Cline EH. 1177 B.C.: The 12 months Civilization Collapsed: Revised and Up to date. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton College Press; 2021.
  192. 192.
    Kaniewski D, Marriner N, Cheddadi R, Fischer PM, Otto T, Luce F, et al. Local weather Change and Social Unrest: A 6,000-12 months Chronicle From the Jap Mediterranean. Geophysical Analysis Letters. 2020;47: e2020GL087496.
  193. 193.
    Knapp B, Manning S. Disaster in Context: The Finish of the Late Bronze Age within the Jap Mediterranean. American Journal of Archaeology. 2016;120: 99–149.
  194. 194.
    Tainter J. The collapse of advanced societies. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press; 1988.
  195. 195.
    Fontijn DR. Economies of Destruction: How the Systematic Destruction of Valuables Created Worth in Bronze Age Europe, C. 2300–500 BC. Routledge; 2019.
  196. 196.
    Bradley R. Hoards and the deposition of metalwork. In: Harding A, Fokkens H, editors. The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age. Oxford: Oxford College Press; 2013. pp. 121–139.
  197. 197.
    Fontijn D. All the things in its proper place? On selectve deposition, panorama and the development of idenity in later prehistory. In: Jones A, editor. Prehistoric Europe. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. pp. 86–106.
  198. 198.
    Hansen S. Votive Choices between the Carpathian Basin and the Aegean in Hoards and Sanctuaries. In: Maran J, Băjenaru R, Ailincăi S-C, Popescu A-D, Hansen S, editors. Objects, Concepts and Vacationers: Contacts Between the Balkans, the Aegean and Western Anatolia In the course of the Bronze and Early Iron Age: Quantity to the Reminiscence of Alexandru Vulpe: Proceedings of the Convention in Tulcea, 10–13 November, 2017. Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH; 2020. pp. 165–185.
  199. 199.
    Todorović J. Katalog praistorijskich metalnich predmeta. Beograd; 1971.
  200. 200.
    Jovanović D. Ostave Vršačkog Gorja: Markovac-Grunjac. Vršac: Vršac Muzej; 2010.
  201. 201.
    Vinski-Gasparini Okay. Kultura polja sa žarama u sjevernoj Hrvatskoj. Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet; 1973.
  202. 202.
    Becker Okay. The courting of Irish Late Bronze Age Dowris section metalwork—a pilot examine. Journal of Irish Archaeology. 2012; 7–15.
  203. 203.
    Hansen S. Studien zu den Metalldeponierungen während der älteren Urnenfelderzeit zwischen Rhônetal und Karpatenbecken 1. 1. Bonn: Habelt; 1994.
  204. 204.
    Haldon J, Chase AF, Eastwood W, Medina-Elizalde M, Izdebski A, Ludlow F, et al. Demystifying Collapse: Local weather, surroundings, and social company in pre-modern societies. Millennium. 2020;17: 1–33.
  205. 205.
    Raffield B. Damaged Worlds: In the direction of an Archaeology of the Shatter Zone. J Archaeol Technique Principle. 2021;28: 871–910.
  206. 206.
    Kaul F. Bronze Age tripartite cosmologies. 2005;80: 135–148.

Source Link

What's Your Reaction?
Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0
View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

2022 Blinking Robots.
WordPress by Doejo

Scroll To Top