Now Reading
Worth of life – Wikipedia

Worth of life – Wikipedia

2024-01-08 02:59:26

Financial worth

The worth of life is an financial value used to quantify the advantage of avoiding a fatality.[1] It is usually known as the price of life, worth of stopping a fatality (VPF), implied price of averting a fatality (ICAF), and worth of a statistical life (VSL). In social and political sciences, it’s the marginal cost of dying prevention in a sure class of circumstances. In lots of research the worth additionally contains the standard of life, the anticipated life time remaining, in addition to the incomes potential of a given particular person particularly for an after-the-fact cost in a wrongful death claim lawsuit.

As such, it’s a statistical time period, the price of decreasing the average variety of deaths by one. It is a vital challenge in a variety of disciplines together with economics, health care, adoption, political economy, insurance, worker safety, environmental impact assessment, globalization,[2] and process safety.[3][4]

The motivation for putting a financial worth on life is to allow coverage and regulatory analysts to allocate the restricted provide of resources, infrastructure, labor, and tax income. Estimates for the worth of a life are used to check the life-saving and risk-reduction advantages of recent insurance policies, laws, and initiatives in opposition to quite a lot of different elements,[2] typically utilizing a cost-benefit analysis.[3]

Estimates for the statistical worth of life are revealed and utilized in follow by numerous authorities businesses. In Western countries and different liberal democracies, estimates for the worth of a statistical life usually vary from US$1 millionUS$10 million; for instance, the USA FEMA estimated the worth of a statistical life at US$7.5 million in 2020.[5]

Remedy in economics and strategies of calculation[edit]

There isn’t a customary idea for the worth of a selected human life in economics. Nonetheless, when taking a look at danger/reward trade-offs that individuals make with regard to their well being, economists typically take into account the worth of a statistical life (VSL). Be aware that the VSL could be very totally different from the worth of an precise life. It’s the worth positioned on modifications within the probability of dying, not the value somebody would pay to keep away from sure dying. That is greatest defined by the use of an instance. From the EPA‘s web site:

Suppose every particular person in a pattern of 100,000 folks have been requested how a lot she or he can be keen to pay for a discount of their particular person danger of dying by 1 in 100,000, or 0.001%, over the subsequent 12 months. Since this discount in danger would imply that we’d count on one fewer dying among the many pattern of 100,000 folks over the subsequent 12 months on common, that is generally described as “one statistical life saved.” Now suppose that the common response to this hypothetical query was $100. Then the overall greenback quantity that the group can be keen to pay to avoid wasting one statistical life in a 12 months can be $100 per particular person × 100,000 folks, or $10 million. That is what is supposed by the “worth of a statistical life.” [6]

This once more emphasizes that VSL is extra of an estimate of willingness to pay for small reductions in mortality dangers reasonably than how a lot a human life is price. Utilizing authorities spending to see how a lot is spent to avoid wasting lives as a way to estimate the common particular person VSL is a well-liked technique of calculation. America authorities doesn’t have an official worth of life threshold, however totally different values are utilized in totally different businesses. It may be that the federal government values lives fairly extremely or that calculation customary are usually not utilized uniformly.[7] Utilizing the EPA for instance, the Company makes use of estimates of how a lot individuals are keen to pay for small reductions of their dangers of dying from antagonistic well being circumstances which may be attributable to environmental air pollution of their cost-benefit analyses.[6]

Economists typically estimate the VSL by trying on the dangers that individuals are voluntarily keen to take and the way a lot they should be paid for taking them.[8] This technique is named revealed preference, the place the actions of the person reveal how a lot they worth one thing. On this context, economists would have a look at how a lot people are keen to pay for one thing that reduces their probability of dying. Equally, compensating differentials, that are the diminished or extra wage funds which are meant to compensate staff for conveniences or downsides of a job, can be utilized for VSL calculations. For instance, a job that’s extra harmful for a employee’s well being would possibly require that the employee be compensated extra. The compensating differentials technique has a number of weaknesses. One challenge is that the strategy assumes that individuals have info, which isn’t at all times accessible. One other challenge is that individuals could have greater or decrease perceptions of danger they’re going through that don’t equate to precise statistical danger. Basically, it’s troublesome for folks to precisely perceive and assess danger. It is usually laborious to regulate for different features of a job or several types of work when utilizing this technique.[7] Total, revealed desire could not signify inhabitants preferences as a complete due to the variations between people.[9]

One technique that can be utilized to calculate VSL is summing the overall present discounted value of lifetime earnings. There are a few issues utilizing this technique. One potential supply of variability is that totally different discount rates can be utilized on this calculation, leading to dissimilar VSL estimates. One other potential challenge when utilizing wages to worth life is that the calculation doesn’t take into consideration the worth of time that’s not spent working, akin to trip or leisure.[10] Consequently, VSL estimates could also be inaccurate as a result of time spent on leisure could possibly be valued at the next fee than a person’s wage.[7]

One other technique used to estimate VSL is contingent valuation. Contingent valuation asks people to worth an possibility both that they haven’t chosen or are unable to presently select.[7] Economists would possibly estimate the VSL by merely asking folks (e.g. via questionnaires) how a lot they might be keen to pay for a discount within the probability of dying, maybe by buying security enhancements.[11] A lot of these research are known as stated preference research. Nonetheless, contingent valuation has some flaws. The primary drawback is named the isolation of points, the place individuals could give totally different values when requested to worth one thing alone versus when they’re requested to worth a number of issues. The order of how these points are offered to folks issues as nicely.[7] One other potential challenge is the “embedding effect” recognized by Diamond and Hausman 1994.[12] All of those strategies would possibly end in a VSL that’s overstated or understated.

When calculating worth of statistical life, you will need to low cost and alter it for inflation and actual revenue progress over time. An instance of a components wanted to regulate the VSL of a selected 12 months is given by the next:

the place

VSLO = Unique Base Yr, VSLT = Up to date Base Yr, PT = Worth Index in Yr t, IT = Actual Incomes in Yr t, ε = Earnings Elasticity of VSL.

Comparisons to different strategies[edit]

The worth of statistical life (VSL) estimates are sometimes used within the transport sector[13] and in course of security (the place it could be coupled with the ALARP idea).[4] In health economics and within the pharmaceutical sector, nonetheless, the worth of a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is used extra typically than the VSL. Each of those measures are utilized in cost-benefit analyses as a technique of assigning a financial worth of bettering or worsening one’s life circumstances. Whereas QALY measures the standard of life starting from 0–1, VSL monetizes the values utilizing willingness-to-pay.[14]

Researchers have first tried to monetize QALY within the Nineteen Seventies, with numerous research being achieved to standardize values between and inside nations. Nonetheless, as with the QALY, VSL estimates have additionally had a historical past of vastly differing ranges of estimates inside nations, however a standardization amongst nations. One of many greatest actions to take action was the EuroVaQ undertaking which used a pattern of 40,000 people to develop the WTP of a number of European nations.[15]

Coverage purposes[edit]

Worth of life estimates are steadily used to estimate the advantages added as a result of a brand new coverage or act handed by the federal government. One instance is the 6-year retroactive research on the advantages and prices of the 1970 Clear Air Act[clarification needed] within the interval from 1970 to 1990. This research was commissioned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Air and Radiation and Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, however was carried out by an impartial board of public well being specialists, economists, and scientists headed by Dr. Richard Schmalensee of MIT.[16]

On conducting the benefit-cost evaluation, the workforce measured every greenback worth of an environmental profit by estimating a what number of {dollars} an individual is keen to pay as a way to lower or remove a present risk to their well being, in any other case often known as their “willingness-to-pay” (WTP). The WTP of the U.S. inhabitants was estimated and summed for separate classes together with mortality, continual bronchitis, hypertension, IQ modifications, and strokes. Thus, the person WTPs have been added to get the worth of a statistical life (VSL) for every class thought of within the valuation of the act’s advantages.[17] Every valuation in determine 1 was the product of a number of research which compiled each solicited WTP info from people and estimated WTP estimates from danger compensation demanded within the present labor market and was averaged to discover a singular VSL. Such information from the labor market was taken from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.[18]

For instance, the valuation estimates used for mortality have been divided by the everyday life expectancy of every survey pattern as a way to get a greenback estimate per life-year misplaced or saved which was discounted with a 5 % low cost fee.[19]

Utilizing these estimates, the paper concluded that the advantages, starting from $5.6 to $49.4 trillion in 1990 {dollars}, of implementing the Clear Air Act from 1970 to 1990 outweighed the financial prices of $523 billion in 1990 {dollars}.[20]

Figuring out the worth of life is useful when performing a cost-benefit evaluation, particularly in regard to public coverage. With a purpose to resolve whether or not or not a coverage is price enterprise, you will need to precisely measure prices and advantages. Public packages that cope with issues like security (i.e. highways, illness management, housing) require correct valuations as a way to finances spending.[21]

Since sources are finite, trade-offs are inevitable, even relating to potential life-or-death choices. The task of a worth to particular person life is one attainable strategy to trying to make rational decisions about these trade-offs.

When deciding on the suitable degree of well being care spending, a typical technique is to equate the marginal price of the well being care to the marginal advantages acquired.[22] With a purpose to get hold of a marginal profit quantity, some estimation of the greenback worth of life is required. One notable instance was discovered by Stanford professor Stefanos Zenios, whose workforce calculated the cost-effectiveness of kidney dialysis. His workforce discovered that the VSL implied by then present dialysis follow averages about US$129,000 per quality-adjusted life 12 months (QALY).[23] This calculation has essential implications for well being care as Zenios defined:

“That signifies that if Medicare paid an extra $129,000 to deal with a bunch of sufferers, on common, group members would get yet another quality-adjusted life 12 months.”[24]

In risk management actions akin to within the areas of workplace safety, and insurance coverage, it’s typically helpful to place a exact financial worth on a given life. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration beneath the Department of Labor units penalties and laws for corporations to adjust to security requirements to forestall office accidents and deaths.[25] It may be argued that these excessive penalties are meant to behave as a deterrent in order that corporations have an incentive to keep away from them. As such, the value of the fines must be roughly equal to the worth of a human life. Though some research of the effectiveness of fines as a deterrent have discovered combined outcomes.[26]

In transportation modes it is extremely essential to contemplate the external cost that’s paid by the society however isn’t calculated, for making it extra sustainable. The exterior price, though consisting of impacts on climate, crops and public health amongst others, is essentially decided by impacts on mortality rate.

Estimates of the worth of life[edit]

Equal parameters are utilized in many nations, with important variation within the worth assigned.[2]

Worldwide VSL with information values[disputed ]

Australia[edit]

In Australia, the worth of a statistical life has been set at:

  • AU$5.1 million (2021)[1]
  • AU$222,000 per 12 months (2021)

India[edit]

Utilizing a hedonic wage strategy, the VSL in India amongst blue-collar male staff in manufacturing industries of Ahmedabad, Gujarat has been estimated to be 44.69 million INR ($0.64 million) in 2018.[27]

New Zealand[edit]

In New Zealand, the worth of a statistical life has been set at:

  • NZ$2 million (1991) by NZTA[28]
  • NZ$3.85 million (2013) by The Treasury[29]
  • NZ$4.14 million (2016) by NZTA[28]
  • NZ$4.53 million (June 2019) by Ministry of Transport [30]

Singapore[edit]

The worth of statistical life (VSL) in Singapore was estimated in 2007 through a contingent valuation survey that elicits willingness-to-pay (WTP) for mortality danger reductions, which interviewed 801 Singaporeans and Singapore Everlasting Residents aged 40 and above, entailing a worth of statistical life of roughly S$850,000 to S$2.05 million (in 2007 S$, which is roughly 1.36 S$ in 2022). Imply WTP was additionally proven to have an inverse relationship with age, and is about 20% decrease for individuals aged 70 and older. Per current literature, the research additionally finds that imply WTP isn’t affected by bodily well being; however is affected by psychological well being. As well as, imply WTP isn’t affected by covariates akin to gender, race, and private revenue, however is affected by covariates akin to family revenue, age, occupation and degree of schooling.[31]

For site visitors accidents, the WTP-based VSL was estimated in 2008 at S$1.87 million (in 2008 S$, which is roughly 1.27 S$ in 2022). This was additionally in contrast in opposition to WTP-based VSL estimates in different nations, together with 4.63 million for the US, 3.11 million for Sweden, 2.41 million for the UK, 2.38 million for New Zealand and 1.76 million for the EU (in 2008 S$).[32]

The VSL obtained by different strategies could differ considerably. As an example, if the VSL is estimated from the World Financial institution VSL adjusted to country-specific gross home product, which displays a human capital strategy, then the VSL in Singapore can be calculated to be US$8.96 million in 2014 (S$11.3 million in 2014, in 2014 S$, which is roughly 1.09 S$ in 2022).[33]

Sweden[edit]

In Sweden, the worth of a statistical life has been estimated from 9 to 98 million SEK (€0.9 – 10.6 million).[34]

  • 34.6 million SEK (€3.7 million) imply of research in Sweden from 1995 and on
  • 23 million SEK (€2.5 million) median of research in Sweden from 1995 and on
  • 22 million SEK (€2.4 million) advisable by official authorities

Turkey[edit]

Research by Hacettepe University estimated the VSL at about half one million purchasing power parity adjusted 2012 US {dollars},[35] the worth of a more healthy and longer life (VHLL) for Turkey at about 42,000 lira (about $27,600 in PPP-adjusted 2012 USD), and the worth of a life 12 months (VOLY) as about 10,300 TL (about $6,800 in PPP-adjusted 2012 USD), all as of 2012.[36]

As of 2016 the estimated produced financial worth for a life time for Turkey was US$59,000 which was 5.4 occasions GDP per capita.[37]

Russia[edit]

In keeping with totally different estimates life worth in Russia varies from $40,000 as much as $2 million. On the outcomes of opinion ballot life worth (as the price of monetary compensation for the dying) to start with of 2015 was about $71,500.[38]

United States[edit]

The next estimates have been utilized to the worth of life. The estimates are both for one 12 months of extra life or for the statistical worth of a single life.

  • $50,000 per 12 months of high quality life (the “dialysis customary”,[39] which had been a de facto worldwide customary most personal and government-run medical health insurance plans worldwide use to find out whether or not to cowl a brand new medical process)[40]
  • $129,000 per 12 months of high quality life (an replace to the “dialysis customary”)[41][40]
  • $7.5 million (Federal Emergency Administration Company, Jul. 2020)[5]
  • $9.1 million (Environmental Safety Company, 2010)[42]
  • $9.2 million (Division of Transportation, 2014)[43]
  • $9.6 million (Division of Transportation, Aug. 2016)[44]
  • $12.5 million (Division of Transportation, 2022)[45]

The income elasticity of the worth of statistical life has been estimated at 0.5 to 0.6.[46] Creating markets have smaller statistical worth of life.[46] The statistical worth of life additionally decreases with age.[46]

Traditionally, youngsters have been valued little monetarily, however modifications in cultural norms have resulted in a considerable improve as evinced by developments in injury compensation from wrongful dying lawsuits.[47]

Criticisms[edit]

The worth of a statistical life has come beneath criticism from a spread of sources each in economics and philosophy.[48][49][50][51][52] These criticisms vary from issues with the particular methodology used, to worth a statistical life to the very prospect of valuing life and utilizing it in price profit analyses.

Issues with aggregation[edit]

Some economists have argued that the worth of a statistical life ought to be “disaggregated” to raised seize the variations in mortality danger discount preferences.[49][48] Cass Sunstein and others have argued that the worth of a statistical life ought to differ by sort of dangers, as individuals are extra involved about some dangers than others, and by people, as some individuals are extra danger in search of than others.[53][49] That is proposed to make sure the accuracy of the measurement, as utilizing a mean could pressure some folks to pay greater than they’re keen to for danger discount, and stop insurance policies from being enacted for people who find themselves keen to pay greater than common for mortality danger discount.[54]

Issues with valuing life[edit]

Some philosophers and policymakers have issues in regards to the underlying concept of valuing a statistical life in any respect. Whereas a few of these issues signify a misunderstanding of what’s meant by the worth of a statistical life, many specific issues with the undertaking of valuing lives.[49][50] Elizabeth Anderson and different philosophers have argued that the strategies for measuring the worth of a statistical life are insufficiently correct as they depend on wage research which are carried out in non-competitive labor markets the place staff have inadequate details about their working circumstances to precisely decide the chance of dying from taking a specific job.[55][51] Additional these philosophers contend that some items (together with mortality danger, in addition to environmental items) are merely incommensurate, it’s unimaginable to check them, and due to this fact unimaginable to monetize them and put them on a single scale, making the very follow of valuing a statistical life problematic.[56][51][57]

Economists have responded to the extra superficial issues by advocating renaming or rebranding the worth of a statistical life as a “micromort” or the quantity somebody can be keen to pay to cut back a one in a single million danger of dying, although philosophers contend that this doesn’t resolve the underlying points.[50][49]

See additionally[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b “Best Practice Regulation Guidance Note: Value of statistical life” (PDF). Division of the Prime Minister and Cupboard, Australian Authorities. August 2021.
  2. ^ a b c Miller, Ted R. (2000). “Variations between International locations in Values of Statistical Life”. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 34: 169–188. ISSN 0022-5258.
  3. ^ a b Franks, Andrew; Whitehead, Richard; Crossthwaite, Phil; Small, Louise (2002). Software of QRA in Operational Security Points. Analysis Report 025. Sudbury: HSE Books. ISBN 0-7176-2570-2.
  4. ^ a b Rausand, Marvin (2011). Danger Evaluation: Principle, Strategies, and Purposes. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-63764-7.
  5. ^ a b “FEMA Benefit‐Cost Analysis (BCA) Toolkit 6.0 Release Notes” (PDF). 2020-07-31. Retrieved 2021-10-29.
  6. ^ a b “Mortality Risk Valuation”. EPA. 2014-04-21. Retrieved 2017-04-25.
  7. ^ a b c d e Gruber, Jonathan. Public Finance and Public Coverage (5 ed.). Value Writer. pp. 226–233.
  8. ^ Mankiw, Gregory (2012). Rules of Economics. Cengage Studying. ISBN 978-0-538-45305-9.
  9. ^ Rohlfs, Chris (2015). “New Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life Using Air Bag Regulations as a Quasi-experiment”. American Financial Journal: Financial Coverage. 7 (1): 331–59. doi:10.1257/pol.20110309. hdl:10419/67207.
  10. ^ Keeler, Emmett (2001). “The worth of remaining lifetime is near estimated values of life”. Journal of Well being Economics. 20 (1): 141–143. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00070-9. PMID 11148869.
  11. ^ Murphy, JJ (2005). “A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation”. Environmental and Useful resource Economics: 152.
  12. ^ Diamond, Peter (1994). “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?”. Journal of Financial Views. 8 (4): 45–64. doi:10.1257/jep.8.4.45.
  13. ^ Milne, Jonathan (2006-10-22). “The Hidden Price Put on Your Life”. The Times. Archived from the unique on 2022-08-20. Retrieved 2023-07-17.
  14. ^ Viscussi, W. Kip (2005). “The Value of Life” (PDF). Harvard John M. Olin Dialogue Paper Collection (517).
  15. ^ “European Value of a Quality Adjusted Life Year”. Newcastle College.
  16. ^ U.S. Environmental Safety Company (October 1997). “The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990- Retrospective Study”. Environmental Economics Analysis Stock: I-3.
  17. ^ U.S. Environmental Safety Company (October 1997). “The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990- Retrospective Study”. Environmental Economics Analysis Stock: 44.
  18. ^ “Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI)- Current and Revised Data”. Bureau of Labor Statistics. United States Division of Labor.
  19. ^ Viscusi, W. Kip (1995). Fatal Tradeoffs. New York: Oxford College Press. ISBN 978-0195102932.
  20. ^ U.S. Environmental Safety Company (October 1997). “The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990- Retrospective Study”. Environmental Economics Analysis Stock: 8.
  21. ^ Rice, Dorothy (1967). “The Economic Value of Human Life”. American Journal of Public Well being. 57 (11): 1954–1966. doi:10.2105/AJPH.57.11.1954. PMC 1227852. PMID 6069745.
  22. ^ Corridor, Robert (2007). “The Value of Life and the Rise of Health Spending” (PDF). Quarterly Journal of Economics. 122: 39–72. doi:10.1162/qjec.122.1.39. S2CID 1542501.
  23. ^ Zenios, Stefanos (2009). “An Empiric Estimate of the Value of Life: Updating the Renal Dialysis Cost-Effectiveness Standard”. Worth in Well being. 12 (1): 80–87. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00401.x. PMID 19911442.
  24. ^ Kingsbury, Kathleen (2008-05-20). “The Value of a Human Life: $129,000”. TIME. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
  25. ^ “OSHA”. OSHA. Division of Labor. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
  26. ^ Kennedy, Christopher (1985). “Prison Sentences for Firms: Various Fining Mechanisms”. California Regulation Overview. 73 (2). doi:10.15779/Z385X6G.
  27. ^ Majumder, Agamoni; Madheswaran, S. (2018). Value of Statistical Life in India: A Hedonic Wage Approach (PDF). Institute for Social and Financial Change. ISBN 978-81-7791-263-0.
  28. ^ a b “Social cost of road crashes and injuries 2016 update” (PDF). NZTA. March 2017.
  29. ^ “Guide to Social Cost Benefit Analysis”. The Treasury. 27 July 2015.
  30. ^ “Social cost of road crashes and injuries 2019 update”.
  31. ^ Hoon, Shi; Lim, Khee Meng (2008). “The value of statistical life in Singapore”.
  32. ^ https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=d7f4873a2591704af85b558b8fd4eb1d1b12bd83[bare URL]
  33. ^ Egerstrom, N.; Rojas-Rueda, D.; Martuzzi, M.; Jalaludin, B.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.; So, R.; Lim, Y. H.; Loft, S.; Andersen, Z. J.; Cole-Hunter, T. (2022). “Health and economic benefits of meeting WHO air quality guidelines, Western Pacific Region”. Bulletin of the World Well being Group. 101 (2): 130–139. doi:10.2471/BLT.22.288938. PMC 9874370. PMID 36733628.
  34. ^ Hultkrantz, Lars (20 September 2012). “The worth of a statistical life in Sweden: A assessment of the empirical literature”. Well being Coverage. 108 (2–3): 302–310. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.09.007. PMID 23084655.
  35. ^ Ara, Shihomi; Tekeşin, Cem (4 July 2014). “Measuring the Value of Mortality Risk Reductions in Turkey”. Worldwide Journal of Environmental Analysis and Public Well being. 11 (7): 6890–6922. doi:10.3390/ijerph110706890. PMC 4113852. PMID 25000150.
  36. ^ Tekeşin, Cem; Ara, Shihomi (29 September 2017). “The Monetary Valuation of Lifetime Health Improvement and Life Expectancy Gains in Turkey”. Worldwide Journal of Environmental Analysis and Public Well being. 14 (10): 1151. doi:10.3390/ijerph14101151. PMC 5664652. PMID 28961227.
  37. ^ Tuna, E.; Yenilmez, F. B.; Kockaya, G. (2016-11-01). “Estimation Of Value Of Life With A Model Approach Depending On Net Present Value For Turkey”. Worth in Well being. 19 (7): A477. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.756. ISSN 1098-3015.
  38. ^ “Стоимость человеческой жизни в России в 2015 году составила 4,5 млн. рублей” (PDF). Heart for Strategic Researches RGS.
  39. ^ Hirth, Richard A. (2000). “Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life 12 months: in the hunt for a regular”. Medical Resolution Making. 20 (3): 332–342. doi:10.1177/0272989X0002000310. PMID 10929856. S2CID 25646395.
  40. ^ a b Kingsbury, Kathleen (20 Might 2008). “The Value of a Human Life: $129,000”. time.com. Archived from the original on Might 27, 2008.
  41. ^ Lee, Chris P. (2009). “An Empiric Estimate of the Value of Life: Updating the Renal Dialysis Cost-Effectiveness Standard”. Worth in Well being. 12 (1): 80–87. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00401.x. PMID 19911442.
  42. ^ Appelbaum, Binyamin (Feb 16, 2011). “As U.S. Agencies Put More Value on a Life, Businesses Fret”. The New York Occasions.
  43. ^ “Guidance on Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life” (PDF). US Division of Transportation. 13 June 2014.
  44. ^ “DoT 2016” (PDF). 2016-08-08. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
  45. ^ “Departmental Guidance on Valuation of a Statistical Life in Economic Analysis”. U.S. Division of Transportation. 23 March 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2023.
  46. ^ a b c Viscusi, W. Kip; Aldy, Joseph E. (2003). “The Worth of a Statistical Life: A Crucial Overview of Market Estimates All through the World”. Journal of Danger and Uncertainty. 27 (1): 5–76. doi:10.1023/A:1025598106257. S2CID 189928888.
  47. ^ Mayyasi, Alex (30 June 2016). “How Children Went from Worthless to Priceless”. Priceonomics. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  48. ^ a b Sunstein, Cass (2004-11-01). “Valuing Life: A Plea for Disaggregation”. Duke Regulation Journal. 54 (2): 385–445. ISSN 0012-7086. PMID 15940845.
  49. ^ a b c d e Cameron, Trudy Ann (2010-07-01). “Euthanizing the Value of a Statistical Life”. Overview of Environmental Economics and Coverage. 4 (2): 161–178. doi:10.1093/reep/req010. ISSN 1750-6816.
  50. ^ a b c Carneades (2022). Are All Lives Equal? Why Cost Benefit Analysis Values Rich Lives More and How Philosophy Can Fix it. Carneades.org. ISBN 979-8986128610.
  51. ^ a b c Anderson, Elizabeth (1993). Value in ethics and economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard College Press. ISBN 0-674-93189-0. OCLC 27430064.
  52. ^ John, Stephen David; Curran, Emma J. (2021-03-19). “Costa, cancer and coronavirus: contractualism as a guide to the ethics of lockdown”. Journal of Medical Ethics. 48 (9): 643–650. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-107103. ISSN 0306-6800. PMC 7985975. PMID 33741680.
  53. ^ Sunstein, Cass (2004-11-01). “Valuing Life: A Plea for Disaggregation”. Duke Regulation Journal. 54 (2): 385–445. ISSN 0012-7086. PMID 15940845. First, VSL ought to differ throughout dangers. For instance, individuals are keen to pay excessive quantities to keep away from most cancers dangers, and therefore there may be cause to assume that individuals’s VSL is greater for most cancers deaths than for sudden, unanticipated deaths. Most cancers dangers are concerned within the work of many regulatory businesses, and other people appear to be notably involved about such dangers, in a method that ought to produce a excessive VSL- virtually unquestionably greater than the values that businesses now use. Extra typically, deaths that produce uncommon worry, or which are accompanied by excessive ranges of ache and struggling, ought to be anticipated to provide the next VSL. Human beings face numerous mortality dangers, and it could be actually weird to take care of that individuals worth avoiding every of these dangers identically. Second, VSL ought to differ throughout people, just because totally different individuals are keen to pay totally different quantities to keep away from dangers. People who find themselves danger averse might be keen to pay extra, and can due to this fact present the next VSL, than people who find themselves risk-seeking. Those that are wealthy will present the next VSL than those that are poor. People who find themselves thirty would possibly nicely present the next VSL than people who find themselves sixty. It follows that totally different demographic teams will present range of their VSLs as nicely.
  54. ^ Carneades (2022). Are All Lives Equal? Why Cost Benefit Analysis Values Rich Lives More and How Philosophy Can Fix it. Carneades.org. ISBN 979-8986128610. we must always worth dangers by demographic teams in order that if a specific group is extra impacted by a danger than one other, we will use a extra correct worth of a statistical life for that group. It will guarantee that the federal government neither imposes undue prices or fails to remove dangers that people can be keen to pay to remove.
  55. ^ Ackerman, Frank (2004). Priceless : on knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. Lisa Heinzerling. New York. ISBN 1-56584-850-0. OCLC 52819812.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location lacking writer (link)
  56. ^ Sagoff, Mark (2004). Price, principle, and the environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge College Press. ISBN 0-511-23172-5. OCLC 76951369.
  57. ^ Carneades (25 June 2022). Are All Lives Equal? Why Cost Benefit Analysis Values Rich Lives More and How Philosophy Can Fix it. Carneades.org. ISBN 979-8986128610. If there are some items that can not be in contrast, then the undertaking of trying to monetize the entire advantages and prices for comparability is flawed from the beginning. Should you settle for this place, you might have a method out of the unique problematic conclusion. If we can’t examine the worth of a life and different advantages, then the issue of disparately valued lives comes from attempting to transform a life into one thing with which it can’t be in contrast: cash.

Additional studying[edit]

Exterior hyperlinks[edit]


Source Link

What's Your Reaction?
Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0
View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

2022 Blinking Robots.
WordPress by Doejo

Scroll To Top